Permanent ban according to whom?

[nndrei]

The permanent ban for players who interfere with a mission is an incredibly stupid idea.

 

Let's talk about the following example:

 

 

Player 1 plays against Player 2 in a car detonation mission.

There is 1 minute left for the mission to end. Player 1 manages to kill Player 2 and starts to put the bomb in the car.

 

A random player who likes to drive his Vegas 4x4 unintentionally crashes into the mission car. And interrupts the process of planting the bomb of Player 1.

Causing him to lose the mission.

 

Player 1 was recording his game and reports the random player who hit the car. With video evidence.

 

 

Another case, new players even some veterans don't know how to distinguish normal parked cars from mission cars.

There needs to be a way to be able to distinguish mission cars.

 

 

Wouldn't it be more logical to make the mission cars not have hitboxes for players outside the mission?

 

Instead of looking for the easy solution and permanently banning players who don't even know what they are doing?

[CookiePuss]

No one gets banned for a simple misunderstanding. If you get banned for griefing,  you did it multiple times and after multiple warnings... anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. 

[Todesklinge]

Or your Teamleader runs in to your car, to force a team kill by you, to remove you from mission...

 

A unfair system to remove members out of the team!

[MonkaS]

6 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

No one gets banned for a simple misunderstanding. If you get banned for griefing,  you did it multiple times and after multiple warnings... anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. 

this. same thing with dethreating literally takes what I would call way to many instances of it to receive any punishment and the first one is never permanent only in the case of cheating will it be a permanent first time offence. (ignore the 3 day ban for cheating message after trying to log in that is LO lying to you it always turns into a permanent ban there is no 'investigation') 

Edited September 11, 2021 by MonkaS

[xHenryman90x]

11 hours ago, Roxane said:

Wouldn't it be more logical to make the mission cars not have hitboxes for players outside the mission?

This and many other features such as trading system and district queue.

[FakeBungo]

griefing is part of APB, anybody opposed to griefing is playing the wrong game. in particular, apb is a game based on anarchy and civil unrest with criminals and vigilantes fighting eachother. if measures are to be made against griefing, then make missions harder to be griefed instead of crying on the forums or discord.

[Cuve]

On 9/11/2021 at 4:49 AM, CookiePuss said:

No one gets banned for a simple misunderstanding. If you get banned for griefing,  you did it multiple times and after multiple warnings... anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. 

Since when does LO give any warnings for anything.

[ShaiShai]

On 9/10/2021 at 10:49 PM, CookiePuss said:

No one gets banned for a simple misunderstanding. If you get banned for griefing,  you did it multiple times and after multiple warnings... anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. 

this, i don't think they ban for a accident, but if your caught doing it to the same person over and over, then yea, you deserve the ban and its no longer a accident

[JunoSuzuki]

Let's never make them remove OOM collision and just behave.

[BlatMan]

1 minute ago, JunoSuzuki said:

Let's never make them remove OOM collision and just behave.

 

Lets remove it, then we watch as players vehicles get stuck in each other when the mission ends.

[FakeBungo]

5 hours ago, JunoSuzuki said:

Let's never make them remove OOM collision and just behave.

LO also needs to remove guns from the game, its too toxic and griefing me while im trying to roleplay as a civilian.

[BlatMan]

6 hours ago, FakeBungo said:

LO also needs to remove guns from the game, its too toxic and griefing me while im trying to roleplay as a civilian.

Stop pressing K. They can't shoot you if they're not opposition.

[MeatyNomNoms]

On 9/19/2021 at 3:23 PM, BlatMan said:

 

Lets remove it, then we watch as players vehicles get stuck in each other when the mission ends.

If sitting on top of a vehicle spawn tells me anything, it will just lead to some sweet launches.

[KyoukiDotExe]

On 9/11/2021 at 2:11 PM, FakeBungo said:

griefing is part of APB, anybody opposed to griefing is playing the wrong game. in particular, apb is a game based on anarchy and civil unrest with criminals and vigilantes fighting eachother. if measures are to be made against griefing, then make missions harder to be griefed instead of crying on the forums or discord.

intentional griefing is not part of the game, that is no fun for anyone who gets 'targeted griefing' people stopping them from playing the game normally.

 

Driving around and hitting another player can always happen, that is part of it.

[nndrei]

On 21/9/2021 at 13:43, KyoukiDotExe said:

El duelo intencional no es parte del juego, eso no es divertido para cualquiera que tenga a personas con `` aflicciones específicas '' que les impidan jugar el juego normalmente.

 

Conducir y golpear a otro jugador siempre puede suceder, eso es parte de ello.

It's fine for me.

 

The problem is when that player that you have crashed, reports you, with a simple photo or video, also asks his 4 friends to report you too and you end up banned.

[vsb]

6 hours ago, Roxane said:

It's fine for me.

 

The problem is when that player that you have crashed, reports you, with a simple photo or video, also asks his 4 friends to report you too and you end up banned.

super doubtful anyone gets banned solely based off reports, especially not just from 5

 

 

Edited September 25, 2021 by glaciers
typo

[EVInezca]

1 hour ago, glaciers said:

super doubtful anyone gets banned solely based off reports, especially not just from 5

 

 

if you disturb others a ban is justified.  By 1 report. But not for a simple crashed or blocked a car spawn. 

 

 To become only a little forced break for a real grief is fine.

[MrM0dZ]

On 9/10/2021 at 8:09 PM, Roxane said:

The permanent ban for players who interfere with a mission is an incredibly stupid idea.

 

Let's talk about the following example:

 

 

Player 1 plays against Player 2 in a car detonation mission.

There is 1 minute left for the mission to end. Player 1 manages to kill Player 2 and starts to put the bomb in the car.

 

A random player who likes to drive his Vegas 4x4 unintentionally crashes into the mission car. And interrupts the process of planting the bomb of Player 1.

Causing him to lose the mission.

 

Player 1 was recording his game and reports the random player who hit the car. With video evidence.

 

 

Another case, new players even some veterans don't know how to distinguish normal parked cars from mission cars.

There needs to be a way to be able to distinguish mission cars.

 

 

Wouldn't it be more logical to make the mission cars not have hitboxes for players outside the mission?

 

Instead of looking for the easy solution and permanently banning players who don't even know what they are doing?

welcome to APB, shit happens i guess

[FakeBungo]

LO spends alot of time banning griefers but doesn't care at all about blatant hackers. very strange.

[DreAmGirL]

Ban in APB xd? really?

[EVInezca]

On 9/26/2021 at 9:38 AM, FakeBungo said:

LO spends alot of time banning griefers but doesn't care at all about blatant hackers. very strange.

Yes that so strange but true