All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Ardita replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Don't worry, the new anti cheat system will hunt down all the cheaters very soon!!!! The new anti cheat: -
Ah Hai! :3 I remember your profile now by the picture as well ^_^
-
half the people in this thread have specifically said the .45 is too strong in cqc guess which gun has the exact same performance in cqc as the .45 i give it a week before the complainers realize they’re still getting outplayed by the same players except with a fr0g instead, and the nerf campaign begins again
- Yesterday
-
Oh my apoligies, hold on. I'll get a list of every single secondary so I can list them all for you under the label of that these weapons are not really a problem. Bar maybe the Joker-RFP then, and if you're so sure about the Nano I'll put it in the list of "These are okay secondaries" along with the rest.
-
Salubri changed their profile photo
-
Never said anyone would complain about Mountie, PDW or N-FA as neither of these weapons are being used in any meaningful number and are not worth talking about. FBW is probably the most balanced secondary currently if anything they should be balancing other secondaries around it. And complaining about current Nano is just lol. But the moment good players start maining frog post .45 nerf is the moment complaints on forums will start by people getting killed in 5 shots under 0.8 sec. like they are now from .45.
-
My guy, no one is gonna complain about a dang Mountie or PDW or N-FA. Not about FBW, not about Showstopper. People are already saying the FR0G would be a fair thing to go up against... I COULD however see people complain about the Joker-RFP or the OCA-Nano if they really went looking for something to complain on but c'mon man. We ain't petty. But .45 crosses a clear line.
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
OnEGod replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
I do have solution. Sue all cheat sites and get monneeeeyyy -
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
OnEGod replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Okayyyyyy, your out of box idea seems fair after years of pain from cheaters destroying APB... But, I wouldn't do that. Someone told in last ama that this game should have kill cam that would be awesome feature and maybe one button save to your computer so you can show that to future ticket handlers? Their own anti cheat sounds horrible but at least they try to do something for the game and that's what I like to hear and see UPDATES! -
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
I think Matt has made it clear that he has no desire to ban people that were identified as cheating. His concern that he voiced in the most recent AMA, was that he cannot be 1000% sure that they were cheating. This does explain, I think to some degree, why the two "unban waves" that occurred in the last several years. They are planning on introducing there own "home-brew" antcheat program, and for those player that use 3rd party tools to cheat would suffer "sanctions" and the loss of features. (not sure what features they would lose, time will tell) I had another idea that LO might consider, although extremely radical and totally "out-of-the-box" thinking" Since playing on a "level playing field" is almost impossible to achieve when players are using 3rd party tools, why not just allow "ALL" 3rd party tools for all players ? Macros with Triggerbots, no-recoil, consistent fire rate, or for those players that don't mind paying a monthly subscription for some of those elite tools, like Aimbot, Smooth Aim, ESP and whatnot, everyone then would all be on a level playing field. Granted, it would remove the "competitive gameplay" from the game, but at least we would all be playing on a level playing field. I mean, we're really not afforded a competitive game play experience as it is now. Kind of like "May the best aimbot win" kind of approach. Ok, ok, so maybe some of the long time cheaters might not like this approach much, cause, the loss of a distinctive advantage and all. But at least the legit players of today, can enjoy playing on a level playing field. Hell, LO could ditch their in house developed anticheat, and release a Premium Only version of their Aimbots and ESP. I think this would be a WIN WIN for both the players and LO. Thoughts ? -
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Weaboos replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
We had players? -
Btw, that was me who just whispered in your ear in the game
-
You got beated
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Ardita replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
That must have been very long time ago -
namieaydin98 joined the community
-
ALL CHEATERS BULLETINS (APB)
Ardita replied to JOSELA's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
I don't know for how long the playerbase will wait till proper anticheat works I won't say that I totally gave up hoping that some day it will change, but I believe something soon needs to happen at this point to anticheat so the playerbase who'll recieve maintenance info's won't be lower than 50 players Yet I told myself long time ago, move on, and yet I am still here ^_^ -
05/07 MAINTENANCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Ardita replied to MageLO's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Thanks both of you -
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
CookiePuss replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
We had more than 4,000 players? -
smithwarners joined the community
-
OnEGod started following Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
OnEGod replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Hello, I saw that LO was going to bring new anti cheat system to APB and thought to myself why not give it a try. I had 7/10 matches against one or many cheaters in same team and it was awful ... I'm old school player and I've loved this game soooo much! First they should have ticket system running and take very seriously every ticket that people send! We are the ones who will support this game to the end IF LO support us! LEGIT PLAYERS! Second thing that LO should do is that when someone gets banned they get banned from game and also get hardware ban. I thought they already did that, but maybe cheaters can bypass that? These two are main things why people quit not because there is nothing to do or some BS! I spend my time designing stuff because I don't want to battle against cheaters. One thing I like is that if you cannot find matches in your district, game asks you if you want to move districts to find one! Good one LO i just hope matchmaking should work bit faster. When you press k it should take Max 1min to start! Just my thoughts thanks - Last week
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
DedGaem replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
He's definitely catered to the cheaters since the beginning... and the end result was thousands of players quit playing.. pretty horrible business decision.. since the cheating community... can't be larger than aprox 200,,, and easily 4,000 quit playing because... why play a competitive shooter when you're getting trashed by macroers, aimbots, ESP, no recoil, etc. The only incentive and reward is for cheating. -
ALL CHEATERS BULLETINS (APB)
DedGaem replied to JOSELA's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
It's pretty clear Little Orbit as a game publisher HATES their legit playerbase.. and leaves players to fend for themselves against the most insane level of unregulated cheating (with no anticheat for months) in gaming history.