Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Yesterday
  2. DavidHemi

    Account Hacked

    @Azukii @MattScott ^ ^ ^
  3. I can agree. I'm in Philadelphia and have really relied on the low latency for dominance. Slowly and surely this game is dissolving.. but on to your point about the servers they do use. Is there anyway we can see the specs of what their using? I would love to know what era of tech they're working with.
  4. That’s what I think too. Hopefully we find out something soon.
  5. They have been saying for years they want to expand the game but continue to ignore the problems that are killing the game. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. But right now if there is only going to be one NA server it needs to be in the best location for all of NA, not just for the US west coast.
  6. If LO was going to have only two servers they would put one in Europe and one in South America. The Americans and their polite Canadian counterparts are the minority now. edit: LO plans to have more than two or even 3 regions
  7. We generally announce maintenance windows that are longer than what our estimate for the actual downtime will be in case something comes up during the maintenance that needs to be fixed which will require extra time. While 8-12 hours of maintenance are definitely on the extreme end during most weeks the game will be back up and running after 3-5 hours.
  8. You completely ignore the conversation. But thats cool you do you
  9. West is also NA, there you have your district.
  10. When G1 let in the BRs years ago and lifted the ban on them many US players quit. Yea there are a good number of BR players playing. But they are in SA not NA. This is a server for North America and they are the focus. LO would have a SA server if they wanted to focus on that region. Yes higher latency does alot for balanced gameplay, especially in a game where the server latency is abnormally high to begin with due to very low end servers and a highly unoptimized game. If LO is only going to have one server location it should be centeralized so that latency is best for all NA players on average.
  11. 80% of the Na server is made up of Brazilians, now with western servers our ping is around 180-220. Before with the east servers our ping was around 120.
  12. wheter you like it or not, there are probably more brs/south american players than US people playing East servers. I will never understand why US players complain about 25-30 higher latency...
  13. Hello, Downloading the latest VCRedist directly from Microsoft should fix your problem: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/windows/latest-supported-vc-redist?view=msvc-170 - Azukii
  14. That will always be a thing as ppl are on each coast. Again for other countries there isnt much I can say, this is NA servers for NA living people. That should be the focus and the server location should be somewhere that will be the best overall for everyone. US central is the best place for both US, Canada and Mexico residing peeps as it will provide the best latency for all.
  15. Hello, I have moved this topic to the Social District (General Discussion) section of our forums. For any assistance, please contact our Customer Support on https://gamersfirst.com/support - Azukii
  16. Azukii

    Can't open support site.

    Hello there, The link to our Customer Support has changed: https://gamersfirst.com/support - Azukii
  17. Cause most ppl are over on the east coast? So having to connect to the west coast will increase latency? Cause the APB servers are garbage to begin with? Its all problems on the LO side of things. They removed the better servers (historically east servers performed better) and expect latency to be the same. I made a thread about this but if there only keeping one server bank it should be in the central US so latency is the same for each coast
  18. I swear its gotten a lot worse, back in the heyday I don't remember many instances of missions overlapping, now I see it multiple times in one mission, sometimes even 3 missions in one place. I wonder if it has to do with the removal of missions, smaller pool seems like it would mean less variation in suitable locations.
  19. Yes, It would help with pop, it would be hard on the Australian and other pacific nations that play west, but not as bad as it is for them to play east. which is always popped first, I dont know where they got their statistics from. I always seen east being used over west, even prior to the unbanning and new contacts. What I think is that they had to pay for that east server, and im thinking it was too much for their budget. However with that said, I think there are very few players from the western states, like 2or3 from California a couple from Canada, in comparison to the rest of players living in N.A. Having one central server would help us all. Instead of East/West. Then everyone has to come to populate one server, not go east for a week, and then west for two days, and stop the East/West Rivalry.
  20. Hello, I have moved this topic to the Social District (General Discussion) section of our forums. Please contact our Customer Support on https://gamersfirst.com/support for further details. - Azukii
  21. Azukii

    Steam Account

    Hello, I have moved this topic to the PC Bugs & Tech Issues section of our forums. Regarding your issue, please contact our customer support on https://gamersfirst.com/support for assistance. - Azukii
  22. Maybe 45, when it was 50, people were running into each other, having to climb over each other to get to a mission. Even at 40 we still have missions overlapping, as in two missions in same area, where ya gotta share a corner with some other team, n he shoot some n then i take the same wall corner n do some shooting n step back for the other team to use the corner.
  23. I was not talking about hackers mack. Central would benefit those in the US, which is the point of having US servers. Not trying to dis other countries but you can only focus on the region your setting up the servers for and if this is a US server for NA then if its bad for Brazil its a too bad so sad for them. I personally never had such a ping difference between Fin and WF so that might be a you problem.
  24. 50 v 50 would be the bare minimum If they want a pool big enough for variety 75 v 75 would be the number
  25. Even 45v45 would be an improvement. It's fairly screwed up right now, I had a group in a full 40v40 district wait over half an hour between matches
  26. Well for one LO owes Western Legits for having to play east. East was always better for the hackers and so is WF. And they let them all in. If it was a hackless game, I would agree on a texas or central server. But most the pop are from other nations. and most hack, due to lack of concern by LO. Making legits fight solid hackers from other nations is preposterous, So LO Owes me now. Adding levels so i gotta remax what i already earned and every mission is all hackers. LO might save some money moving to texas, the taxes in california are like russia. I get 1ms in west fin, but 28 in west WF, so i think they have the 'Office server for west fin in Orange County, just south of Los Angeles, and the WF server must be farther away. Game has no future, its all hax, no staff, no staff actions as far as sard and bans ect. From what I hear this is common with all the video games, their all hacked out. LO would do good to just close its doors and sell out, this game is for seasoned hackers, continuing to operate the game only serves criminals a platform to conduct their sociopathic interests.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...