-
Content Count
796 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
186 ExcellentAbout Westford
-
Rank
Optimistic
Recent Profile Visitors
3841 profile views
-
ALL CHEATERS BULLETINS (APB)
Westford replied to JOSELA's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
I wouldn't be too harsh with @Dead_Game 's sentiments. He has a point. If we were to walk down memory lane for a bit, Little Orbit acquired APB (Gamersfirst) back in May of 2018. 7 Years. Yeah, I let that sink in a bit before I reflected on some of the direct, and even indirect messaging in those 7 years. Hmm, 2 unban waves. The clear message from Matt Scott that "We will not ban cheaters" opened up the flood gates, metaphorically speaking, and a definite "gut punch" for those players that just wanted "Fair Gameplay". I get it... battling cheaters can be viewed as "no win situation" , constant and never ending for the Game Co. Not sure I agree with LO's decision for the 2 unban waves and the messaging concerning cheaters. And here we are... 7 years later, having the same discussion as we did in 2010, 2014, 2016..... Was curious how many Legit Players "threw in the towel", and went to the "DARK side", just to get some "Fair Gameplay". I mean, they won't be banned, so that's a plus. I don't play many missions as much as I used to, but I do like the driving the cars. Was chasing this one Foxy speedhacker the other night, in my car. Couldn't catch her. And she certainly wasn't hiding it. Looking forward to the June update, for this year, 2025. -
I may be wrong with the name, it was so long ago. But yeah, I also heard that this individual had claimed that their account was hacked by someone in russia, and that that person was also in tight with a few GM's. At that time, it was all about "who you know" when it came to APB justice. Fortunately times have changed, when umm, unban waves are a thing, and cheaters can play with more or less impunity. I am still somewhat optimistic that in the near future, fair gameplay will be a priority, Even if that means LO releasing their Premium Tier Aimbot/Wall hack for unrestricted use in game. Then, everyone will be playing on a level playing field. I can't wait.
-
Haha, I remember when G1 would regularly release a new Weapon on ARMAS marketplace that would dominate and was OP as hell. Everyone flocked to the Marketplace to grab this OP weapon. Many complained on the forums.... for months. And then.... after maybe 4-6 months, after many were sold, they would nerf that weapon into oblivion. Haha, I thought to myself.. what a SCAM.. Rinse & Repeat. Lol They made some good coin back then,
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Well this certainly explains a lot. I guess my radical idea to allow everyone to use 3rd party tools wasn't too far off. -
I am on the East Coast of US ,, and have faithfully been connecting to "West Coast" servers, ever since the reprisal of APB after the extended outage in February. Typically the latency is around 80ms, which is doable. Tonight, 180-210 ,,,, Something is not working... Please investigate. Update: Ran a Speed Test, wanted to spot check my internet.. 660 Mbps (down) 22 (up)
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
Little Orbit would not be the first. "Activision Is Suing the Creators of a Call of Duty Hack It Says Is So 'Toxic' It's Causing Fans to Quit Playing the PC Version of Black Ops 6 Altogether" Activision is suing the people behind a well-known Call of Duty hack it alleged is so "toxic" it's causing fans to stop playing the PC version of Black Ops 6 altogether. The lawsuit, filed in the Central District of California and viewed by IGN, takes action against Lergware and GameHook, two Call of Duty hacks that Activision has been trying to shut down for some time. Both hacks include a set of selftitled "toxic" functions, including features that let users "kick" other players from Activision’s multiplayer servers (sometimes referred to as a "rage" cheat), or even crash multiplayer servers entirely. GameHook also lets players cheat by using "aimbots," which cause weapons to automatically hit opponents, and "ESP Bots," which identify opponent positions and allow players to see through walls or other obstacles. -
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
-
Why Matt Scott support cheaters?
Westford replied to PonuryZniwiarz's topic in Social District (General Discussion)
I think Matt has made it clear that he has no desire to ban people that were identified as cheating. His concern that he voiced in the most recent AMA, was that he cannot be 1000% sure that they were cheating. This does explain, I think to some degree, why the two "unban waves" that occurred in the last several years. They are planning on introducing there own "home-brew" antcheat program, and for those player that use 3rd party tools to cheat would suffer "sanctions" and the loss of features. (not sure what features they would lose, time will tell) I had another idea that LO might consider, although extremely radical and totally "out-of-the-box" thinking" Since playing on a "level playing field" is almost impossible to achieve when players are using 3rd party tools, why not just allow "ALL" 3rd party tools for all players ? Macros with Triggerbots, no-recoil, consistent fire rate, or for those players that don't mind paying a monthly subscription for some of those elite tools, like Aimbot, Smooth Aim, ESP and whatnot, everyone then would all be on a level playing field. Granted, it would remove the "competitive gameplay" from the game, but at least we would all be playing on a level playing field. I mean, we're really not afforded a competitive game play experience as it is now. Kind of like "May the best aimbot win" kind of approach. Ok, ok, so maybe some of the long time cheaters might not like this approach much, cause, the loss of a distinctive advantage and all. But at least the legit players of today, can enjoy playing on a level playing field. Hell, LO could ditch their in house developed anticheat, and release a Premium Only version of their Aimbots and ESP. I think this would be a WIN WIN for both the players and LO. Thoughts ? -
I guess what threw me of was the pop-up asking if I wished to proceed with the Yes/No buttons. Thanks for clarifying.
-
I did, four times. "Do you wish to switch Districts for an instant Match.. YES/NO ......" I wish you could alleviate the suspense and just tell me what I missed. What did I miss ?
-
Two Waterfront Districts on NA , albeit west coast servers. But finally a full, or partially full two WF Districts so I can finally level up with the ever elusive, Lynette Casey. Ahh, my shining light. The end of the road as it were. Two WF Districts; Tot Pop /E /C D!: 72 /35 /37 D2: 54 /23 /31 I was in D1. pressed "K" ... cause I had my game face on. Big Window popped up... Do you wish to switch Districts for an instant Match.. YES/NO ...... I chose NO... And then I was "whisked" away to another District,,, So like NO, means maybe .. ? Asking for a friend. EDIT: My friend noticed... the second time.. Windows POP UP. NO System MSG: You will automatically be transferred to another District.