-
Content Count
14213 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by vsb
-
laughs in armored engine
-
this is the least shitty matchmaking i’ve seen in a thread complaining about matchmaking lol
-
How long does it take for support to reply me?
vsb replied to EneSeto's topic in General Discussion Archive
delete buttons exist for a reason -
considering it takes more effort for any player with a functioning brain to game the threat system than it does to maintain gold threat, your “no effort” excuse kind of falls through you know what the actual low effort way to avoid “social politics”? just don’t talk in /d
-
i think its too high orbit should add a function where you actually lose jt after a mission and then change the random reward to be from -5jt to 5jt
-
yeah it would be nice if there was pop 24/7 but there's not idk what use repeatedly posting lobby screenshots is, do you think orbit is somehow unaware of the current population?
-
What is the official statement on these two:
vsb replied to ch4ncer's topic in General Discussion Archive
i stand corrected, xneat has never been bannable by a functional anticheat -
it started off toxic op wants to think he's disliked because he's the bronze jesus spitting cold hard facts at the evil gold devil, but in reality its just because his posts are a mess to read and he has no concept of logical discussion
-
What is the official statement on these two:
vsb replied to ch4ncer's topic in General Discussion Archive
xneat has never been bannable afaik, although there have been several (idiotic) large forum debates about how its somehow unfair macros are a use at your own risk kind of thing programs like ahk or autoit can be detected by anticheat software (and they can also do far more cheaty things than a macro) so i'd steer clear its super doubtful that the anticheat will "detect" mouse software since that would put significant portions of the community at risk of ban just for owning the wrong gaming peripheral, but its technically still possible -
What is the official statement on these two:
vsb replied to ch4ncer's topic in General Discussion Archive
when has xneat ever been an issue? it doesnt affect apb gameplay, in fact it doesnt interact with apb at all - also afaik xneat doesnt work with win10, and i believe im correct in saying a majority of players use win10 macros have always been bannable iirc, but there's a difference something being bannable and actually being able to detect it -
pick the trapsetter subclass they said its totally viable they said
-
the population isnt comprised entirely of max rank golds, don't be ridiculous even if you were right, what would be the reason to play the objectively worse map? im still waiting on an answer for why you demand golds populate every district, but its fine for silvers and bronzes to only play financial
-
i don't even know where you're coming from at this point if you're complaining that gold players (r255 characters don't care about contacts btw, they just go wherever the population is) are filling silver waterfront, then demanding they leave is just going to end up with an silver waterfront district - why don't you ask the bronze district players why they always populate financial districts?
-
waterfront is almost universally the least popular map, the only reason it gets filled every so often is because eventually enough of the remaining pop needs to progress contacts there once that group of people decides to move districts the rest of the pop will follow because there's just not enough players on na to have 2 full (and therefore optimal) silver districts iirc there was a silver financial yesterday
-
yeah the strifes insane burst damage is offset by its ttk and allowing it to negate your target's ability to sprint directly offsets that long ttk, despite the strifes continued nonmetaness i really dont think it needs any buffs
-
im aware of what he's asking and it would involve either lowering the amount of stamina damage required before sprinting is disabled or giving the strife insanely high stamina damage, neither of which are a good idea
-
the current system doesnt allow you to dethreat, farm low tier players all mission, and then let them win to remain at the lowest possible threat level as long as you want just because other systems can be exploited doesnt mean we should ignore how easy it is to actually perform those exploits
-
idk if i like this idea, seeing as preventing players from sprinting already pretty much guarantees a stun seeing as you’re just lowering the bar for winning fights, i think this is off the table if there’s any plans to buff ltl or rebalance lethal weapons around an ltl mod
-
sounds heavily exploitable
-
the nssw did receive a buff in the past tho, it wasn’t always such a laser - iirc it had more horizontal recoil
-
but you can drive off after being emp’d too, unless you were going like 2mph in which case a conc would still be better i’d also argue that forcing opp to deal with a vehicle that’s about to explode next to them is more useful than just stopping them from getting in
-
we’ve had concs for years, why do we suddenly need a version that doesn’t actually do any damage i maintain that orbit should have just rebalanced vehicles instead of adding a crappy gimmick item to “counter” carplay edit: also what kind of sound do emp grenades make?