neophobia

does this dude ever look at the results of his polls

if they do this, give it a reasonable limit, like max 3 accs into one. i wouldn't mind a fee that atleast reflects the amount of additional character slots etc - but i guess more would definitely be reasonable

a straight downgrade to the normal nfas is p2w? no. (yes yes, bigger mag, not like you need that in any normal fight though)

fixed along with zombiemotorcycle-tankhelicopter-pethorse-houserace district (tm)

it's basically the even lamer version of qs + panic button there u go macchina calabria kits>any car buff

? i have ~65 acc wide perm weapons (excluding legendaries) i would pay more for an acc wide kit than a char one i own several char kits too just saying, right now i have to create cars on one char only, otherwise i could do so on each of them - if i had the kits that doesnt take any money away from them, i have no real incentive to rebuy them anyway on the others - since i could just send them over. i could just be a bit more lazy then. and/or use the kits for the cars i already bought accwide.

people still buy the character ones why would you force them to pay more tbf, having the option to get everything accwide would be nice - right now it's only weapons, skins and some packs. the packs give cars and kits too tho.

rip still good one well but you never know.

lmao the downvotes you got worth it i guess (well, i hope it IS a joke xd)

I think this is a joke obviously voted yes

quite some people were positive about it - but not in the old state so arguments/discussion about how to change it are quite good (sorry lixil, can't remove the tag from the quote for some reason)

inb4 another

Can't wait for my aw3418dw to arrive on tuesday to do this aaaaaaaa isn't this possible with the advanced launcher anyway? or are there more changes needed? this should be fine right? don't mind the other checkboxes, i have no idea why this stuff was enabled, just changed it.

it is, if you think this is And for the other bit: Of course you can - usually - but I already wrote an elaborate explanation why this is ambigous - and why you are wrong in this case. (If you go by the question of the poll (which you put the answers in for), not the title one.) And although you put some bias in the title, from the poll I couldn't possibly judge since you voted for all of them.

Kinda hypocritical to harass people because they were banned :^) It's not like all of them were for a good reason. While I wasn't subject to any bias etc I saw it happen. I'm not talking about any particular case though. Hint: You could just write "Buff" or "Nerf" if you already are able to put in such a variety of options. And no, you didn't. If you have an OR - a logical disjunction - yes/true means either or both. No way to find out which of the two options was actually chosen. No means neither. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction There is no definite way to interprete this, even if it came down to common sense/colloquial stuff. You threw questions with alternative readings together and expect us to answer with polar ones. Enjoy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/disjunction/#DisjLang https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1638&amp=&context=pwpl You did not put any obvious bias in there either - which would determine what you meant (to some degree) https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-syntax-of-yes-and-no-9780198701859 No definition of what yes/no means here either.

You could though. Why not? The human reaction time + muscle memory should be capable of getting results very close to it - and it's not like you get it with the mousewheel every time anyway unless you really spam it (because it doesn't even go THAT fast), and then you'd mess up everything else. Right? It's not as viable as you claim. Well, to be fair, I've never tried after I've done it when I was new to the game - thus I have no idea how much it actually helps. Just thinking about rate the mousewheel clicks + the weapon can be shot makes me believe you need to spin it very fast to get matching cycles - and that you can get the same result not much more effort when just clicking. I feel you are being way too nitpicky and stubborn about this. It just makes it a bit more easier in some cases. But this is like complaining that people with red switches need less actuation force than blacks and thus can click faster. It's more of a matter of personal preference to me. If you played with a trigger, instead of a button, you could just spam it more too. If you have mousebuttons with better rebound, you could spam it more too - etc pp.

I went to kindergarten, primary school, "grammar school" and am at university right now. (grammer school + uni are not really posh/expensive over here.) I'm working as a tutor at that uni for 10h/week and at Dell for 20h/week parallely to be able to afford my... living? That's my life till now. Not very exciting. I am glad about the latter bit to be quite honest cause... well, feels like enough trouble to me right now. I wonder if I could handle more tension etc. Well, I'll be done with my bachelor thesis on tuesday so I'll see what future I'll have from then on. I can't say that I really wanna see though. (21)

Ah, Anarchy was just in once and for a short time, like 3? 4? years ago. Was around the NSSW release I think since you could get a 10? day trial there - I think Edit: Actually 5 years ago. https://apbreloaded.gamersfirst.com/2013/05/anarchy-in-streets.html And I was right about the NSSW! And the 10 days! Damn. Late 5 year Anarchy anniversary? Anyone? No?

As pointed out by others - no, that was not the thing. It was the implementation, no scoreboard, doesnt occupy a weaponslot, you don't swap the weapon but just gain it additionally I agree, it would be good that premium weapons would be shared this way - because people could see that they aren't any better than f2p. Also, sales of premium things are what keep the game going. All in all the concept was quite fun and cool. Keep it as a no resupply weapon though. It also promotes playstyles like in CS:GO like with the CZ-Auto (minus the economy bit (which is the biggest factor but w/e)), bring a weapon that isn't too great in general but kills a person quickly in some scenarios - and just be able to use it from there. This can be both positive and negative: While this sounds good and all, it just promotes to rush people instead of having proper tactics - and then you instantly have the advantage. No previous positioning etc required. Of course it mostly punishs bad positiong and tactics then. I like the "give them some of their own medicine" bit but ye. It isn't all too great. It isn't even wasted time anyway, since you just took the sniper down who was a pain. It's invested time. Idk. I would like to see a come back - but probably not in (regular) mission districts - keep it in FC e.g. Weekly rotating mission districts with modifiers? That would be cool - to me. But splitting the playerbase... uh. Polishing it also sounds like a lot of effort. The scoreboards are not too great as-is so I doubt this would come without issues.

But maybe also his teammates - that would be bad Sorry

weird. it works now. i had exactly those settings as i screenshot (tried 3 times, had the tab still open too) now it works. for the record: this is what i had

Ah actually I just meant the background of the site lmao (the one with double b) If this improved smth, I am glad tho xd Ye, clickable link-portion seems impossible - unless you split the image into two parts, which is very possible. (but the clickable one would only be available as full heigth or width rectangles) anyway, I tried to use the site but it doesn't let me generate anything. I put all the text in and selected an image...

this. what in the world. this is like playing music in social but worse. atleast OP doesn't want to annoy teammates though, i guess that's good?

First of all: you can use "background: fixed center; background-size: cover;" for the background (in CSS/style) so it doesn't stretch that weirdly on the website (if the original one isn't, i didn't check) (minor thing) second thing: you can just use the editor here to turn an image into a link. simply click on the image and then the link button. ("tutorial" in spoiler - it works the same way in the signature editor (that one works with bbcode...)) no idea how to automate that. bbcode doesn't seem to work (it simply disappears without changing anything) and you already tried HTML.

They are subpar, albeit quite fun, but ye - just to begin with: the TTK is just not very competetive.