-
Content Count
2260 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by UubeNubeh DaWog
-
It actually physically hurts my soul to hear you click 3x more than you need to. To start with you would probably be far better if you clicked once per shot.
-
What Happens If Battle Eye Is Not Enough?
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to VanilleKeks's topic in General Discussion Archive
There isn't much to discuss when it comes to the efficiency of anti cheat software in gaming. They're only as good as the cheats they detect, and the ones they dont, go "unnoticed" regardless of what actually happens in the game. Answering your main point: "What if BE is not enough?". Relying on one anti cheat alone is never enough, anti cheat software in general can never keep up with the rate cheats get created or changed, they only die down because cheat makers get bored of the game and no one is interested in even playing the game. You could pick any popular game across all the anti cheats and there will be cheats for it based on its popularity, if there was any game truly that difficult to cheat in it would have become the industry standard a long time ago. Stacking anti cheats is usually the next option, having more hoops to jump through/ different ways to detect cheats can make it more difficult but is still not a closed hole. Theoretically a behavior based anti cheat would be the highest efficiency anti cheat possible, but we're still in the infancy stages of having those sorts of anti cheats developed. We already have our own "behavioral" anti cheats in our mind when we see a player snapping between three targets. Something like that which is automated is definitely possible, when we'll see it in place is another discussion altogether. Having personnel actively monitor districts is only a short term solution. At some point people will just tone down the cheats to the point where a staff member who barely plays the game will be able to understand what is happening and action will stop. It doesn't hurt to try and help curb the cheating population but its not something that should be given a lot of valuable resources for an extended period of time. Given the nature of the anti cheat industry right now, really the thing to do when an anti cheat is not enough is to "wait for a breakthrough" or "wait for a better one". -
Mid day right now. I may aswell sleep tho cant play apb
-
I'd agree if i was only looking at the /fps counter. 33ms solid even though we're being ddosed. What top tier servers.
-
Cheaters more and more. (YES AGAIN)
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to eazy-vinny's topic in General Discussion Archive
Actually there is a reason why there are no HP/Spread/Fire rate hacks, because they're server sided. If the whole game was server side it would mean you would have to get into the actual servers before you can even do anything remotely like cheating. If the game was like that though the user experience would be the worst thing in the world, worse than some early access games. Usually rule of thumb is that getting around server sided features is 1000 times worse than its worth. Which is why you never saw any real "fairfight bypass". Even when a cheat maker could make cheats in APB before they would have no idea if they were under the radar because everything was calculated on the server. Unlike client side anti cheats which once you've bypassed the anti cheat to get in the game and you're not banned within the hour you're more than likely clear till the next update (if you know what youre doing). -
What do you mean? The servers are at a constant 33ms the whole time. There is nothing wrong.
-
Anthen x Individualism clips vid
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to anthen's topic in Breakwater Galleria (Creations/Fan Art)
The whole point of making a video and advertising it to everyone is for other people to watch. They arent playing so they wont be getting distracted, the better the game looks the more people will be interested watching your video. -
And it would all end if people could take a loss. Thats the crazy part.
-
The newest loot boxes. Weapon Accessories.
-
Mentioning cheaters is now censored.
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to -KC-'s topic in General Discussion Archive
Definitely straight up ignoring everything. Except this whole image says nothing about when you break the rules. It doesnt matter who/what/when/where/why or how a platform is hosted a private business has the right to enforce censorship. There is a time and place for "freedom of speech" but doing it in someones kitchen even when told "no" is still against the rules no matter how badly you want people to listen to you. Regardless of what rights we have, people still have the right to refuse yours given the right circumstances. Whether you think its right or not. Abiding by rules is not being anti freedom. "The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees Freedom of Speech. This guarantee generally safeguards the right of individuals to express themselves without governmental restraint. Nevertheless, the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment is not absolute. It has never been interpreted to guarantee all forms of speech without any restraint whatsoever. Instead, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that state and federal governments may place reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of individual expression. Time, place, and manner (TPM) restrictions accommodate public convenience and promote order by regulating traffic flow, preserving property interests, conserving the environment, and protecting the administration of justice." https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Time%2C+Place%2C+and+Manner+Restrictions -
Mentioning cheaters is now censored.
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to -KC-'s topic in General Discussion Archive
Someone doesn't know what is actually in the first amendment and that it does not extend to private places. https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/about/faq/do-individuals-have-first-amendment-rights-on-others-private-property/ These forums are a private property owned by Gamersfirst. Their rules come first. -
Threat system based on time.
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to Defibrillator's topic in General Discussion Archive
Mostly because no one outside of internal game staff know the variables. Like knowing what can get an anti cheat to ban you. The only way to reach top tier threat in a system based on time would be to be a social afk'r. -
You could find more actual information on the wikipedia page. The first comment showed that the OP had no idea what they were talking about in the first place. First mistake was assuming BE works the same on every game its used on.
-
Yes max rank on OTW PLOX Uube Buube
-
Why is player movement still client-side?
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to Hexerin's topic in General Discussion Archive
You know how cars currently work? Protip: theyre server sided. Do you really want server sided player movement? Really? -
[Clothing design tips & tutorials] - Clothing Space
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to UubeNubeh DaWog's topic in Tutorials
I was using this since 2015 xD. I dont think i even met you then lol -
This is for those who have messy ingame wardrobes and need a simple fix. Obviously not the only way things can be done but this is my version. Music for the video is delayed for the time being but will be in the video Soon™.
-
[Clothing design tips & tutorials] - Skin
UubeNubeh DaWog replied to UubeNubeh DaWog's topic in Tutorials
Thats true. I always try and make my symbols/clothing as easy as possible to apply which normally involves making a large symbol instead of piecing it together on the clothing itself. Another thing is that symbols made in the editor will keep their quality better than piecing them together on the clothing itself. Thank you all. Glad this was usefull, however you decide to work it -
No game currently or since a long time ago solely uses reports as a real system to judge players. Only games or servers that have no anti cheat support. Game companies know how easily reports can be misused which is why they get anti cheats in the first place. Bruh. This forum is not a public forum neither was it a public forum when G1 was in control. This is a private forum. Rules are created and applied for a reason.
-
I spent at least 7 hours in baylan A. I didnt use that many of the changed guns. Cobra: Felt a lot better and was closer to before the last changes with being able to tap fire longer ranges but Baylan A Cobra could be used in CQC a lot easier. Even without mods. Misery: The extra damage did make it a little better, it would still need mods to be viable against other guns with mods. Didnt have any problem going toe to toe with other unmodded weapons. JG: Some of the pre modded ones seemed to be the same as live versions? Showstopper: It felt like players were given another 6 shots to their shot guns. Promoted corner popping gameplay way too much for its damage output up close. Marksman mode on shotguns seemed to be worse than the current live versions, dunno if that was intended but being able to easily hipfire 15m+ kills and then marksman mode doing basically nothing it felt a bit weird to say the least. Overall: Shotguns felt like the new HVR. If you didnt have a shotgun you were going to be outgunned easily in short to short-mid ranges. My last thoughts would be that shotguns are not that bad currently and dont need this change. The main reason for this is that the only issue shotguns have now is hit reg (but so does everything else). Even while being in Baylan A with rarely an 90% full district i was still experiencing hit reg problems across all guns that i used at some point or another. These changes basically felt like they circumvented the issues with the servers to make getting kills with shotguns easier than they need to be.