vsb

wE alREadY hAVe inGaMe sTAts

it was advertised in the blog and in a pinned post here in the social subforum

you're really hitting peak levels of whining at this point, if the guy wants to spend his JT on something he likes what's it to you?

well they do ban people for griefing and dethreating so he's not *entirely* wrong i doubt "farming new players" will ever be a bannable offense unless there are drastic changes made to the game in order to mitigate such behavior as much as possible first

but ur the biggest joke on the apb forums, how can this be? got em edit: oh yeah on topic, apb 2.1 load times are drastically improved both from desktop launch and from district to district as for "code verification" i assume you mean 2fa, which was originally supposed to stop trade locks from happening (they can be triggered from upgrading pc hardware, to logging in from a different ip, to even some windows updates) but that never actually happened - i personally dont use it because i dont find the increased annoyance worth the extra security on a f2p game account, but its up to you

apbdb says 75m, but i havent used either sbsr since i bought them at release so you could be right

no reason they can't both be the same gun but visually different like the raptor guns, there's really no reason for the coroner to exist as the only stat difference is 25m less range iirc

could always make the SBSRs anubis reskins, that way they are at least an average gun maybe even keep the hard damage

its actually more effective to either complete or abandon the mission in order to get thrown back in the matchmaking pool as a solo player, rather than whatever random team the system has already decided is hard to matchmake for

this is what happens in probably 95% of all my fights where the opp uses med spray, whether they have kevlar or not if you want to run med spray for that 5% chance of not blowing your load on an embarrassing fart ragdoll and a 45s cooldown, well apb is all about choice

i disagree that the ntec "drastically outperformed" the far or even the atac at any point post-hb2 nerf i do think the ntec was slightly stronger than both, but being the best of a weapon category when there are viable competitors isnt a reason for a nerf imo as supporting evidence both the far and the atac have now been nerfed (the far specifically as a result of the ntec changes) following the removal of the ARs' central balancing pillar

the sound of an opgl firing

why cant you just bump the dozen other threads youve already made about this same thing?

the last one buffed it, and this patch nerfed it slightly

neat

i was more thinking for 3 point hold final stages but things would be fine if the neutral points mechanic was removed

i guess it seems reasonable all the final stage point maximums will probably need changing, along with lots of fine tuning to make sure missions aren't too short if one side gets an early lead and not too long if both sides are going back and forth

i honestly have no idea what you mean then, you want missions to only be decided based on obj points and not mission timer? it doesnt seem like it would solve anything other than people spamming F on item hold missions, but even that wouldnt really change depending on what each team's point values are

not sure i want overtime to be anything beyond last ditch extra time i would like 3 point hold overtime changed so that the leading team has to fully capture 2 points to win instead of the current capture 1 and neutralize 1

because the FAR was nerfed too

yeah when you come out of the gate saying entire mechanics like running and carplay are unintended it helps to actually say what you mean

thats just you massacring the english language then, because when something is unintended it means that thing is unintended, not something else so when you say its no wonder people misunderstand you because that quote means running was not supposed to be possible at all, not that running was unbalanced no one goes around saying "the pmg was unintended"

spook day is uncancelled

if it wasnt intended at all then it would be removed, you're just going in circles at this point carplay is a good example of exactly the same kind of balance - lower tank vehicle hp and a downside added to HBF to make the mechanic both more risky and less rewarding, without completely removing vehicles as a source of cover

all that would mean is that running was intended and it just wasnt intended to be too effective, hence the balancing instead of outright removal after all just because a gun gets nerfed doesnt mean the devs want it removed from the game