vsb

large empty open world maps are pretty played out imo, id much rather have a smaller city section thats very intricate (interiors, rooftops, ledges, etc)

yeah i’m not adverse to new titles i like idea for a certain number of trades reward tho

i wouldn’t know

rather than that the trading system should probably be added to the ingame tutorial, as bad as it is

i mean, there would be different gameplay merely because of the map being different as for weapon choice, i'd be fine with a repeat of financial meta since its pretty well balanced for all weapon types

this is still in the game iirc seems like a good place for a friendly reminder that my favorite song is still mislabeled in the music player back when g1 did the community artist program and removed some of the old tracks because of licensing issues, SGX - Have No Tyrant was renamed to SGX - Peripatetic but it kept the same audio

i remember thinking the og thread was pretty cool while we dont have enough contacts or content (or population, as least on jericho) for a new district, i cant say that a map change wouldnt be crazy refreshing after all these years with financial and waterfront

cool, no need for me then

+rep for breaking tos i guess oh and +rep to all the “trusted” middlemen who scammed people anyway lol

i’m also hearing that if player 1 alters the trade (i.e. quickly removes an item) after player 2 accepts, player 1 can still accept the trade and it will go through seeing as this system was held back specifically so that various scamming exploits could be fixed, why is it that the trade doesn’t default to “unaccepted” if any items are removed or added? then again i’m hearing this secondhand so who knows if it’s correct edit: spazzed

might have worked 3 years ago

theres never been actual objectives in chaos/anarchy districts, even though probably half the forum community has suggested it at one time or another

no fun allowed

seems pretty open and shut, was there a need for a thread?

do you have any specific suggestions? this is kind of broad and vague

doubles

id think this would be largely useless in apb since we dont have one shot kill guns or headshots sure you could probably use it to get an initial hvr shot off - which is undoubtedly an ok advantage - but imo apb is far too mobile (compared to csgo's pixel angles) for this to be worthwhile

i probably wouldnt buy them, but i guess it would be cool edit: also my condolences dude

the whole point is that it’s not supposed to be gambling

iirc they lowered the lcr rof so that the ir3 change wouldn’t affect it so much if that hasn’t happened yet then i’m just spazzing out rn

finalized ir3 will be 15% additional range + 3m i’m not saying it’s perfectly balanced - 1.27s ttk is pushing slightly into sniper rifle times and imo the gun itself just isn’t accurate enough to reliably make use of an extra 14m range - but i’d day it’s far from useless

i don’t think you actually read through the thread

a .7s increase in ttk for like 14m extra range doesn’t seem like that bad of a trade off to me

not having open slots because it made certain guns (csg and scout iirc) “too good” was a g1 excuse, now that we have different devs who are doing different balancing maybe we can finally get open slots