Jump to content

CookiePuss

SPCT
  • Content Count

    12910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CookiePuss

  1. Im fine with whatever is best for the game. That being said, Im having a hard time understanding how giving less reason to buy premium will bring in more money.
  2. I hope you kept your tin foil hat my friend. Also, try and keep up.
  3. I got one of the Raptor guns unlocked from the event last chistmas. If only I didnt own so many condors.
  4. Im sure you have, but just in case better change your password.
  5. I once asked Reverse to go easy on me. ... he then killed me with a blowtorch. Plz nerf
  6. Im so anal about my setup, I dont know if this statement makes me envy you or hate you!
  7. Jeez... thats twice now. You mean bruh. Plus, everyone knows Im an ARMAS "p2w" player.
  8. I honestly dont think Ive ever heard anyone call APB "hardcore".
  9. Thats a hard no from me. Games cost money, and that money has to come from somewhere. You either charge to play, charge for customization, or you charge for better equipment. Personally Id rather have limited customization and be able to play for free, while not being gimped in combat. But thats just me.
  10. Well said. Well said indeed. This actually made me feel better. Thanks!
  11. I dont understand what you are saying Katchwi.
  12. If the threat / matchmaking systems were flawless this would be true. But since they arent, it isnt.
  13. Awww... but Im nais gai! But I think I get what you mean, both threat determination and matchmaking leave much to be desired. I wish LO luck in improving them.
  14. I dont think I understand what you are trying to say.
  15. I feel you man, it sucks to not have fun while playing. Hopefully once BE is running full bore, you will see a lot less cheating. Kudos to you for deciding to stick to silver districts, I remember all too well how difficult the transition from bronze to silver can be. I wish I had more advice to give you, but at least until BE is ready, all you can really do is turn of chat, and focus on you. Best of luck my guy.
  16. There is nothing wrong with having fluctuating threat. There is something wrong with INTENTIONALLY lowering your threat. If you go back and forth bewteen silver and bronze districts naturally, thats totally fine. If you in any way purposefully do poorly in matches in order to lose threat you can and should be punished. Its really not that complicated.
  17. I think the GMs being chosen will largely fill this role. But I gotta say, I like the idea of the tutorial being able to tell new players which GMs are online, and how to contact them. Would be a nice way to kind of make up for what I believe is a seriously weak tutorial.
  18. Correct me if Im wrong, but it seems like this system would be even easier to exploit than the current one. At least now people have to put in SOME work in order to continually stomp noobs, but this system would basically allow them to do it permanently and without consequence.
×
×
  • Create New...