CookiePuss

Well at least the voting community seems to be rational. Thats something I guess.

The old Code of Conduct forbade macros. The new one does not mention them.

If the car spawners are too far too reach, they are of no benefit. If you decided not to destroy the car spawner prior to attacking a point thats on you. You arent forced to use it, I havent used one in over a year Im pretty sure. You dont have to buy the spawner, you are given it at level 3 with either Suji or Sabbat. As well as for completing the "mission" section of the tutorial, which can be done in your first mission.

You also unlock the stand alone mod with a tier 1 contact I believe. All cars can be blown up soo.... just blow it up and resupply, or simply damage it enough and resupply, or just stand by it for 10 seconds while they respawn elsewhere. But regardless, how can it be unfair if everyone gets it?

Yeah maybe just a message like "a player has been banned" in /d chat. Or wait... BE bans in waves? You know what, nevermind.

If only bullets damaged cars. If only there was some sort of "mod" that allowed you to, I dont know, "ressuply". If only all players were given access to the mobile spawn mod early in the game so you could set up your own spawn points. Oh well you are right, its probably broken.

I think we found our DDoSer !

just add bots just add bots just add bots

Yeah, sounds mean, but this^ Mobile Spawners are awarded very early in the game, so if you arent running one, its because you chose not to.

Content on broken servers.... brilliant.

Pfft... tease.

lol, for real?

Bro, Im goof af.

Im not sure theyve made a final decision on this. Certainly the asian market is massive and giving up on it probably isnt very attractive.

ayyy lmao!

If they handle transfers like they have in the past (Hoplon and Innova migrations), they will move your characters and all items over.

Bro, this is like your 3rd or 4th farewell post in the last year. Kind of losing its impact at this point.

Here is all we know (I think) This is from the Q&A: Q: In the distant future will character server transfers be possible? A: Let’s give some context, character server transfers are problematic. They are problematic from a technology standpoint, what happens that I’ve seen when you transfer a character from server to server, is because the characters are so heavily customised there’s loads of opportunity for things to go wonky. For the character to literally come over looking different or some of the customization or some of the symbols be missing. It is a very very nuanced process so it’s not something we typically can just open up. Not yet. We’re going to work on that system. I’m a big believer in allowing as many people in the community to play together.I think that right now the community is very fragmented and certainly with respect to Han, that is a low population world server. We are absolutely looking at trying to help them, if only for the moment. I think Gamersfirst needs to take the bullet on mishandeling where those servers went and slowly killing that population. In the near future, now it’s not going to be the next thirty days, but hopefully in the near future we’re going to give all of the Han players the ability to migrate to Jericho and play with other players. The russian server is a bit of a challenge because there’s some unique things those players have so we have to balance that but I would love to see in the future an open sort of character transfer system, that maybe you can’t use it all the time or it has limits around it. But I would love to see players be able to congregate and have a great experience. It cannot be any fun playing on Han right now, where you’re playing the same 25, 26 people over and over and over.

Yeah, here it Matt from the Q&A: Q: Shaders and certain configs, will they be allowed back into APB? A: I feel like that this would be a super slippery slope, to say we’re gunna allow custom shaders or changes to the game. Now having said that, I do think we need to make these options available in the game, we need to put them in. We need to allow players to change the colour of the crosshair for low accessibility, and low processing reasons (Editorial: He meant low processing power.). That’s something that we should be putting in. While we appreciate the community doing the leg work, we feel it should come from our side, because it’ll not only look better, it’ll come from us, it’ll work properly and won’t be flagged by our anti-cheat. It’s a slippery slope to say “sure, you can mess with the components of the game”.

Actuually this is all we have to go off of at the moment... (the new Code of Conduct)

Servers transfers are not available at this time.

Yeah, and AFAIK no one has ever been banned for this. And I can name at least half a dozen streamers who stream with crosshair overlays.

I mean, without stable servers no other changes will matter, right?

Whether or not BE bans for a thing is separate from whether or not the thing is bannable. But as has been mentioned, there are many ways crosshairs can be used that are not detectable. Perhaps once the team gets settled in now that they are back from E3, we can get some clarification on this subject.

iirc G1 said that the price for name change was set to deter people from changing names as G1 did not want to encourage the changing of names maybe if LO feels differently about name changes then the price will change too