Jump to content

CookiePuss

SPCT
  • Content Count

    12899
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CookiePuss

  1. I just want a box I can tick to turn all themes off.
  2. Unfortunately there are no easy solutions. Many of the players you are facing have thousands of hours in game. Often players are playing in premade groups and using comms. If you can find a group to play with, and use comms yourself that will help some. But beyond that, try to worry less about winning or losing, and think more about your individual actions. Every death should be look at in terms of "what did I do wrong?" and "what could I have done differently?". But more than anything just hang in there, both threat assignment and your gameplay will get better.
  3. I guess. Maybe try reposting in your native tongue?
  4. I hope you dont mind, but I corrected that statement for you.
  5. It was only mentioned in the Q&A in regards to dethreating: Q: What will you be doing to tackle dethreating, and if so how? And will there be changes to the threat system? A: This is definitely one of those systems that fall under the “Critical Mechanics” segment earlier. The threat system has to be altered at a minimum, or if necessary, scrapped and started over. There’s just a fundamental flaw at tracking your progress over such a short timeframe. To be able to bring your threat down quickly should not happen, and should take much much longer. We see this as an exploit in some ways, if it is an exploit it should be dealt with. If there’s an exploit then it should be on us to fix it. Shame on us for leaving the exploit in for so long, that it has a name and people can look it up. Thats all we really know for now.
  6. Is that you bvbba? And I gotta say, its hard to believe you dont care. As for the rest, I honestly couldnt understand what you are trying to say.
  7. Threat is on the list of things to be reworked. So thats good news.
  8. Just want to pop in and say that dethreaters can now be reported according to the new CoC. Obviously video or screengrabs of relevant info will help.
  9. Well yeah. Dont we want them looking after GMs whether employee or volunteer? Or dont you want GMs at all? Honestly just get you a free spinning scrollwheel and grab an OSCAR. You'll be at scrollwheel 15 in no time.
  10. Apart from the problems, there were no problems. I agree.
  11. really though, why do you want multiple forum accounts?
  12. Neither of those things were policies under G1, and are not policies under LO.
  13. Doesnt look like spelling is your strong suit tbh. Looks like you are stuck with us then. See you around!
  14. I mean, you could be talking on reddit if you wanted. Could make as many accounts as you want too. Hell, I think we just solved your problem.
  15. Steam charts look like after a steady decline since 2015, there was a spike in late 2016 when the merge happened. And thats with both Citadel and Han continuing to die
  16. You dont think GMs should be able to play the game?
  17. I think we are being trolled. Or at least I hope so.
  18. The current Code of Conduct (not called a ToS) makes no mention of multiple in game accounts. Perhaps Salvick, you should read it sometime. https://forums.gamersfirst.com/topic/99-code-of-conduct/?tab=comments#comment-803
×
×
  • Create New...