Jump to content

TheJellyGoo

Members
  • Content Count

    3584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

303 Excellent

About TheJellyGoo

  • Rank
    'I think, therefore I am'

Recent Profile Visitors

1222 profile views
  1. You're pretty daffy aren't you? I never talked about LO and what they are doing now. It was all about the way up until now. It's like running in circles. Yes, at this point LO is doing the best they can with the hot steaming pile that they inherited from G1.
  2. Keep dodging and silently dropping all your other statements that have been rebutted.
  3. My take on gold lock, because apparently memories are a flimsy thing. It has been stated on multiple occasions that this wouldn't even break the lore. There is friction between the factions all the time. Would be simple to explain some mission interferences. Also in which world does this not help at all? It literally doubles the pool... it's in the word itself. Sure one world phasing would still be the ultimate solution however that doesn't mean we need unnecessary limitations. What do you think those formulas consist of? What has your suggestion to do with the mentioned balance changes? 1 sentence that addresses the point... 5 of completely useless chatter that just water down your whole post making it harder and harder to to get a grip on it. You just throw in so much bullshoot that it becomes impossible to pin you down on the facts because you pollute the whole post with obsolete information that sidetracks the whole point. And if you seriously put those two things (gun/car/mod balance and complete change of vehicular functionality) on the same level then you're really as lost as previous posts indicated. Thinking the EU will make way for a completely new map (or even multiple "maps") in the future is borderline delusional. You're so out of touch with what will happen. Yes, the current code is a mess. No one ever denied that. It's a hurdle not an impossible to climb wall. This whole thread was never a discussion about the now or the from now on. It's about the past and what would have been an alternative way besides years of drought in hopes of a magical EU. It was theorized that it would have been a healthier solution to work with the mess from then till now to have a properly supported game that could have been in a much better state than currently. And no, G1 did not do that. They didn't provide continuous development. They announced the EU and started milking without doing anything. It's not about extending it's life, fixing APB now... now it's to late. Now there is literally only the hope of a magical EU and looking back at what you think it will bring - oh boy will it be not. That is why "ENGINE UPDATE IS THE WORST THA HAPPENED TO APB", because it prevented what could have been. And let's be honest everything would have been better then the current APB. For LO I hope they pull a miracle, I would grant them success for the effort but again they will not succeed with so many delusional people around.
  4. Then what did you intend to say, because that is what it means so far.
  5. I am pretty confused. Did you just devalue your own argument? What languages do you speak? You tell him his base is wrong because he has no insight into programming while saying that this is true for the majority of you/us e.g. including you? That would mean you would be just as unqualified to judge the situation? So how come you can tell but not he?
  6. No one denies that actually having the EU would obviously be better than not. However it's missing the whole point of why it will ultimately have more negative impact. It's just not feesable. To grand of a task. Games are created with a certain span of life in mind. You want to fill that time with content to get your worth out of it. You cannot run on fumes for years. Hoping to make it all back in the end when it is statistically the least profitable stage. This is not LOs fault. I've said before they are doing an admirable job. Just the demon they inherited.
  7. What do you mean? Spaces were clearly listed already
  8. Looks like a few guns are missing, also no need to add reskins. Just pollutes the list. Otherwise nice little tool of course.
  9. Maybe LO could have made their lives a lil'bit easier if it was called an alpha or pre-alpha run? I mean it was kinda foreseeable that a not negligible amount of people would be disappointed in their expectations even with Matt saying to hold ones expectations. Sadly that's just not how it works out ever. People read beta test and run with it... there is no reasoning. Gotta spoonfeed every little thing or it will be misused. It was clearly communicated that it might be to soon. It was a gesture in good faith for the community that had been waiting on progress for years.
  10. Interesting first impression skimming over it. Have to take some time later to crunch some numbers and be thorough to define the changes but Pog to cogs starting to move.
  11. That's how it is sold in theory. In reality it's not viable to have a game run on zero progression for half a decade because you can't revitalize a corpse. There was a clear miscalculation, at least I hope so, in the scale of the task which will ultimately lead to more loss than gain. Would have been far more viable to have an active 5 year plan with regular updates. Could have still decided on the way whether or not an expansion was an option.
  12. My money is on: "Didn't like the answer given thus no answer was given"
  13. I think you're on to something here. My theory is that it's something in relation to 5G. Maybe you can figure more out about that.
×
×
  • Create New...