BlatMan

Don't panic none of them ban for it. I'm not sure if it applies to APB. Rust and PUBG are the two games I've seen the block added to. It's Bloody branded mice with the hardware/firmware programmable macros, as well as some other A4tech mice that share the same hardware. Bloody did release a firmware update to address the issue. You can't use the macros without the software running on your PC. If you have the old firmware or have their software running the games won't launch. These mice are mostly sold in China where there's a much larger cheating problem, and Bloody's main selling point is the hardware macro feature that spoofs mouse movement to control recoil. Still, my G500s has the same built in feature, just not blatantly advertised, just like many other gaming mice. It doesn't make sense to block them. At some point you're hurting the legit user more than helping. Banning hardware is crossing that line.

The players complaining give up those harder games.

Now it's all of the US. EU is still somewhat stable, probably due to using a different entry point into APB's network. I also see a lot of players teleporting/warping/desync since last patch, which my main group of friends also see, so it's not on my end.

They will some day. They already block some gaming mice brands for hardware macros, despite the fact that all gaming mice brands have these features.

Game and server performance. These shouldn't be separate options. Both have the same effect to the end user.

With all this hate towards BE I'm thinking EAC was easier to bypass.

You mean LO looks at /report once in a blue moon?

Did you install any new games recently, specifically ones that use Xigncode3, like PUBG, Valorant or Black Desert Online? They install an invasive anticheat that runs as a driver, and causes performance problems in other games. You can try disabling the service and removing the xhunter1.sys file from C:\Windows It could also be anything else, like a fan in your PC stopped working and your system is overheating.

Keep making copies for them to buy. Milk em of all their cash. If you jacking the price up does not sell, then them jacking it up won't sell either. Besides, I doubt you're getting over $100K/h like you can get ram raiding.

While I'm for making semi-auto weapons full-auto to negate the need for macros, it won't fix the real problem which is OP needing to git gud.

Too late, the Swarm has a recoil pattern.

The vehicle variety is good for now. Most high end vehicles lack decent looking kits, and the low end vehicles don't have any. What I really want are kits that make subtle changes. Like a small lip on the stock bumper. 2" high spoiler with a single thin wing. Small chrome exhaust tip that doesn't look like it came out of an industrial HVAC system. I'd like to see more makeshift vehicle additions. Like a bull bar made from a piece of highway barrier, or a window replaced with sheet metal. Maybe a partial roll bar that's just a u bent pipe, not a full out professional racing roll cage. I'd also like to see some performance mods, using the same color codes we currently have. Something minor like say a turbo kit (orange) that gives you +1.5 top speed. Could add a limit to prevent top speed vehicles from going faster. It would make the low tier cars more viable.

It sounds like that's exactly what people want. Their weapon often misses past 50M, but they keep expecting it to hit. Are they insane? If they think a weapon needs an accuracy buff, then suggest an accuracy buff. Suggesting remove rng doesn't help LO. They need to know specifics. To me, RNG is something you have no control over and cannot work around. You can move closer or switch weapons. I do agree that some weapons could use an accuracy buff. The ACT44 is falls into that same area of not being consistent at it's max damage range.

1. Weapons are skill based. It's your choice if you rely on randomness outside a weapon's intended range. Players who do often lose and blame it on rng, when it was their fault for expecting their shots to hit at max bloom. 2. LO did not make this change. You could shoot through out of mission player vehicles since open beta if my memory is right.

Maybe players won't be so toxic if you actually played the missions instead of quitting most of the time. It makes me sad when it's a nice even 4v4 and then you quit before the first kill.

It's most likely an issue on Amazon's endpoints. You're being sent to the wrong one for that server region. Check the server IP in resource monitor and look up the location.

I actually put work into this...

I'm with you. The whole point of playing a competitive game is to play competitively. Learning the mechanics and mastering them is part of the fun.

For me, mission objectives, player spawn points, and out of mission interference like a garbage truck ramming you. I do not find weapons to be RNG, except maybe shotguns. All weapons have a niche area they perform best in. The stats stay the same all mission. If you chose to use them out of that niche, it's not RNG if you fail, it was your decision to take a chance. Shotguns have such a limited range that it's hard to avoid using them outside that range, but you still chose to use the weapon.

Delete these POS servers. Can't even throw a grenade at times. I bet it's Amazon's endpoint that's causing the problem.

It's still game breaking, just like the flare and firework launcher.

Battleye blocks thos mice in PUBG. It is stupid. ALL mouse manufactures have gaming mice with hardware/firmware macro support. Blocking a single brand doesn't do anyone any good. Cheaters will find a workaround, while legit players won't be able to play. There's some off brands that use the same hardware that do not have macro support, but they're blocked because the driver and firmware match the bloody mice. Better off checking the client for consistent clicks. You'll catch the majority of macro users and not impact the legit users.

The camera rotates the same regardless of aspect ratio or resolutions. It can change the fov slightly, which can make the camera feel different, but rotation is the same so there's no advantage given. You can get the same effect playing on high resolutions with 4:3 aspect ratio like 1920x1440. Lowing the resolution below 720p means you lose key visual details, and all the HUD stuff blocks your screen. That's why I referred to it as shooting yourself in the foot, because you can't see as good. If it works for you, play like that, but it's anything but an advantage.

More like, "I will always find a way to shoot myself in the foot. It's not hard at all."

Going for those 140M OSMAW kills? It's probably just desync as usual. On their screen they've been standing still for 2 seconds, while for me they just stopped moving and the netcode played catchup. With the ATAC it's always silvers.