CookiePuss

I honestly can't remember what was said publicly and what I've heard that's under NDA. I will say though nothing is set in stone, so whatever the mod releases as, it can be tweaked for effectiveness from there.

Mobility, ttk, being forced to ads instead of hipfire. There simply is no reason to lose to an ntec with an SMG in cqc unless you get outplayed. Cover is fine, but your opp can use it as well. And I'm not sure why you think hitting part of a hitbox is hard anyways. So sure if your position is advantageous, you can outperform a better weapon. But this is true of any weapon. In the case of all other things being equal the only reason an ntec beats an SMG inside 20-25m is because you simply got outplayed. P.S. nearing 6,000 hours in game

It's slightly less versatile than the 5, primarily in cqc. The 7 is also less forgiving than the 5 due to slower RoF. The 7 does get an extra 5m before hitting minimum damage (due to lack of curve mechanic) but it has less overdamage so it doesn't actually kill faster within those 5m. It also is LESS forgiving at the initial drop-off at 50m because of the lack of curve. The 7 also has one less mod slot, so you can't modify it as well as the 5. The one thing the Ursus has going for it is the persistent center dot. So if you aren't already using an overlay, that's a plus. All this being said, it doesn't mean that everyone will prefer the 5 to the 7. And if you are more comfortable with the Ursus, then I say stick with it.

I can't even right now.

I too would like to be one of 40 people in a queue for a district.

If its already not the best in cqc, why do you need to make it worse at cqc?

Outside of the Norsemen, if you get beat by an N-TEC in cqc while wielding an SMG, that's on you... not the weapons.

My KDR improved 200% once I started wearing these... But it was discovering these that made me an MLG Pro... (I dont have a vagoobie, so I just stuff em up me bum)

I have to disagree. The Ursus IS a slightly worse, less versatile, N-TEC 5.

For me, the only full auto secondary I'd never use it the S-AS PDW. Nanos are useful, N-FA 9 is beast especially the "Quickdraw", the Mounties (outside of the Yukon imo) are very good in their niche, and of course the UL-3 are extremely effective. Though I guess its all just personal preference. For me the FBW and the 45 AP only get chosen over the full autos because, like the N-TEC 5, they are versatile. Not the best in any category, but useful in nearly all.

You have to be pretty bad to think the full auto pistols suck.

Don't buff them because they have always sucked?

So much wrong about this. ... maybe next poop break.

Either that word doesn't meant what you think it does... Or you are psychic... Or you are talking about a situation you don't know anything about.

One way or another the Fang, like many other guns, will be changed. Also, what if I bought an NFAS?

That's a lot more work than changing a mod or adjusting a stat.

I use nvidia control panel to force nvidia AA

And so it begins...

Meant what I said, actually.

I'm fine with it.

Was just on 3.5 this morning. Things are going well, thanks for asking.

Oh shit we getting Stormtroopers!!!!

Making consumables permanent make for fairer gameplay. New players are already at enough of a disadvantage vs experienced players as it is.

Mouse myth: Higher DPI is better. You see this misleading info a lot. Here is an article explaining why that is false. https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-mouse-myths-busted/