Post 'Battleye' Update statistics

[collectmoments 10]

Would be nice to know if there have been any detections or even bans after the update.

[EMilika 41]

15 hours ago, collectmoments said:

Would be nice to know if there have been any detections or even bans after the update.

I think only admins know.

[឴឴឴឴឴឴឴ 23]

Yeah, detailed changelog what is detected and how would be nice.

/s

[CookiePuss 5378]

nO cHeAtErS iN aPb

[Infinit3Fairl1ght 39]

Last time something like that was publicized, the community turned into full on autism galore, to put it mildly. No thanks.

[collectmoments 10]

45 minutes ago, Aurora_Valis said:

Last time something like that was publicized, the community turned into full on autism galore, to put it mildly. No thanks.

Elaborate?:)

[Ketog 1031]

48 minutes ago, Aurora_Valis said:

Last time something like that was publicized, the community turned into full on autism galore, to put it mildly. No thanks.

 

As sad as it is , it was true

 

 

Having public anonimous stats wouldn't hurt tho .

Edited October 17, 2018 by Ketog

[StrelitziaDeWitt 56]

47 minutes ago, Aurora_Valis said:

Last time something like that was publicized, the community turned into full on autism galore, to put it mildly. No thanks.

You mean that ffbans.org thingy?

In Battlefield 1 they just say who has been banned in the last week or day or something nothing more.

They use Fairfight btw.  

[NotZombieBiscuit 3146]

I miss FFBans comment section.

[HighSociety 148]

Wall of shame would be okay.

but DO NOT tell anyone what changed in anticheat and what is detected ☝

[damn2112 49]

Hell no only LO should be able to see them. Shit like this promotes toxicity. This community already has enough toxic people.

Edited October 17, 2018 by damn2112
l

[Fortune Runner 796]

10 hours ago, collectmoments said:

Would be nice to know if there have been any detections or even bans after the update.

I personally don't want that toxic name and shame APB used to have.

It made such a hostile environment that it was hard to play for fun anymore.

 

[Acornie 490]

4 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

nO cHeAtErS iN aPb

Which mindset is worse? That one, or:

EvReyONe chEEts beCuze TheyRe bETter THan Me

[BrandonBranderson 672]

No thanks.  The cheaters started using the ban feed to get their 5 seconds of fame fix for the day.

[vsb 6171]

the last thing we need is another ffbans, holy crap that site was a breeding ground for toxicity 

[CookiePuss 5378]

34 minutes ago, Archon said:

Which mindset is worse? That one, or:

EvReyONe chEEts beCuze TheyRe bETter THan Me

The everyone cheats one... I think. 

[Fenton 210]

I can't remember when, but IIRC, Matt Scott has said that he doesn't agree with public ban stats as it shows a failure somewhere along the line.

 

[MattScott 15242]

Hi all,

 

I've already said that I will not post ban statistics or embrace the toxicity surrounding the practice of glorifying bans.
We usually communicate at least a couple times of month with their developers to see if there are upgrades.

We also have some very helpful community members turning in cheats they have found or paid for.

 

BattlEye has quietly flagged plenty of accounts for cheating. My team reviews each case, and has banned 100% of them.

I find it interesting that no one is stepping forward from that group to admit they got caught.

 

Thanks,
Matt

[evergIade 24]

10 minutes ago, MattScott said:

Hi all,

 

I've already said that I will not post ban statistics or embrace the toxicity surrounding the practice of glorifying bans.
We usually communicate at least a couple times of month with their developers to see if there are upgrades.

We also have some very helpful community members turning in cheats they have found or paid for.

 

BattlEye has quietly flagged plenty of accounts for cheating. My team reviews each case, and has banned 100% of them.

I find it interesting that no one is stepping forward from that group to admit they got caught.

 

Thanks,
Matt

Good man!!!!

[vsb 6171]

1 minute ago, Ignas / qsn said:

They are directly supporting people who make cheats and they most likely wanted to cheat if they bought them. I wouldn't really call them helpful.

i’d like to assume this was some kind of private invite only cheat but i won’t lie it’s odd that people paying for cheats are being praised, regardless of why they’re paying

[mtz 496]

2 minutes ago, Ignas / qsn said:

They are directly supporting people who make cheats and they most likely wanted to cheat if they bought them. I wouldn't really call them helpful.

Not exactly 100% agreeing with you here. There is no other way to obtain paid cheats other than sending that couple of bucks their creators' way, so some money has to be lost to cheaters. However, if the cheat gets paid for and downloaded, then forwarded straight for analysis, it effectively becomes an open invitation for the anticheat providers to run wild in the cheat's code, see how exactly it hooks into the game, what to look out for, etc.

I'd imagine that most anticheat providers would appreciate people sending them copies of cheat files, since then they can reverse-engineer them, implement counter-measures in the next update, and thus be able to take pride in preventing even more cheats than before.

 

Then again, I'm not an expert in this field, so take my opinion here with a grain of salt :V

[Shui 225]

1 hour ago, Archon said:

EvReyONe chEEts beCuze TheyRe bETter THan Me

^this

gitgud scrubs

[Snubnose 640]

30 minutes ago, MartinPL said:

Not exactly 100% agreeing with you here. There is no other way to obtain paid cheats other than sending that couple of bucks their creators' way, so some money has to be lost to cheaters. However, if the cheat gets paid for and downloaded, then forwarded straight for analysis, it effectively becomes an open invitation for the anticheat providers to run wild in the cheat's code, see how exactly it hooks into the game, what to look out for, etc.

I'd imagine that most anticheat providers would appreciate people sending them copies of cheat files, since then they can reverse-engineer them, implement counter-measures in the next update, and thus be able to take pride in preventing even more cheats than before.

 

Then again, I'm not an expert in this field, so take my opinion here with a grain of salt :V

ran out of 'reactions'... so:
this.

[Fortune Runner 796]

34 minutes ago, Ignas / qsn said:

They are directly supporting people who make cheats and they most likely wanted to cheat if they bought them. I wouldn't really call them helpful.

seeking redemption is a  virtue

seeking bots that truly work and shutting them down is covert ops tactics and undercover police work

either way im thankful *shrugs*

[nndrei 129]

1 hour ago, Ignas / qsn said:

They are directly supporting people who make cheats and they most likely wanted to cheat if they bought them. I wouldn't really call them helpful.

If you have the cheats program in your hands, you can simply have it banned by your anti-cheat before entering the game.