Jump to content

TheJellyGoo

Members
  • Content Count

    3618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheJellyGoo

  1. I agree that it may leave room for misinterpretation but I see it the other way around. The first decision you have to do is whether you want them out of the game the way they are or not (Yes, they break the game|No, they are fine as they are) The middle way is if there are no changes to be done then it is to be removed thus the answer counts towards the "Yes, they break the game" since those people only want to keep it if there are changes
  2. How so? The majority is against Carspawner in it's current form.
  3. That's a straight up lie and you know it. My suggestion actually influences (benefits) two main gameplay aspects. Vehicle variety - running no special mod in trade for HP makes running basic mods viable. You want to be a tank - so be it - without making it a priority target. Anti-Vehicle - heavy weaponry gets a buff and makes them an actual threat Not saying it doesn't need some fine tuning here and there but you know its a start. Also the solution to a meta problem cannot be to force players into running certain setups. Those are reserved for niche trade offs.
  4. Should just add "-50% vehicle health" on all of the special mods. Kinda boring the current meta where all the plebs play around their tanks.
  5. TheJellyGoo

    Hate Mail

    This thread is...
  6. You made a valid trade. You traded your legendary for a valuable life lesson - seems A-OK.
  7. It does matter it changes everything. The details are what make the difference. You just decided to dumb it down to the most basic point so you can claim as yes/no statement. Also please, show me where I insist on the existence of "secret knowledge". I said it is maybe debatable since there are definitely certain tricks which aren't obvious to know but again going into a rather vague definition issue hence the "maybe".
  8. Even your metaphor is flawed since there are variables that change your blue sky. So the question is not "Did you know that the Sky is Blue" but "Did you know when the Sky is Blue". So it is about knowing something and not knowing something under changing premises. Knowing all these shades is what makes a player a good player so it is far from nonsense. The only point I agree with you is about cheats. All others can be broken down to a much more broader level.
  9. But those are exactly the things you list below? Whether it's "elite knowledge" or "secret tactical information" is maybe debatable. It's not like you either know or don't know those things. There are different levels to them too. So no, you're really just wrong if you think it's black and white.
  10. It's not that simple otherwise there wouldn't be dozen of people threating up after losing. We even played someone three times in a row and he lost them all. Ranked up to gold in the first and didn't lose it in the following two. Under this pretense no real gold would actually think about elitism (gold threat) since it is apparent how inflated the supposedly highest threat is. It's more a case of if someone can't even get to that level why bother...
  11. As mentioned you can also disable the feature in options!
  12. How many more of your moronic threads which are always timely removed do we have to see until your posting privileges on this board are finally removed!
  13. That's the saddest attempt to undermine one of my posts I've seen in a long time. Where do you even get the idea that FightClub is part of the equation here. Obviously pug based teaming in FC and or even action district is of no relevance. I am talking about individuals that deliberately group with multiple banned carries where it is apparent even to a third party to make a sound assessment.
  14. I bet some of those cases investigated by LO and considered wrongly banned fall under such category. I went out of my way to report 2-3 players that made it really easy to accumulate documented proof of them doing exactly that. They did end up on ff while (imo) not cheating themselves - justified nonetheless.
  15. It's a really smart move to turn off broadcasts. First they will unban everyone and then no one knows how many are actually being banned again. Instead of being "false banned" people will go back to the excuse of "just using a new char"! So many that admitted their wrongdoings of the past will suddenly suffer under heavy amnesia.
  16. Keep telling yourself this lie if it helps your conscience.
  17. Herein lies the problem as to why this community has become an incurable disaster. Multi banned scum still being supported by fools who believe every lie coming form their mouths or worse knowing the truth and still acting from base motives. Not sure you understand what you just wrote there.
  18. It was actually the exact same patch which they intended as a "buff" that ruined it. But you're the only one who really nailed the issue with it. It really went from a viable mobile fun gun to a sluggish piece of crap. I partly mained the gun until that patch and while the crosshair was a non issue for me its understandable as a personal preference thing. However arguing about it as a lead issue shows how less most people know about the gun or its changes in the past.
  19. For someone who likes to use the word weaboo a lot you certainly do not know it's meaning. You seem to be heavily mislead with the general connotation here. I would suggest looking up the definition of such words before you use them in wrong correlation which makes your rant look like clueless hurry.
  20. Don't worry we can improve performance by going 35vs35. Should solve the issue
  21. But how can there be ddos if the vigilante cheaters did all their evil deeds solely to punish G1? Are you saying people just go on the internet to lie? :O
  22. That's what you get for unbanning hundreds of disposable accounts owned by cheaters. Have fun on the forums the next few weeks.
×
×
  • Create New...