TheJellyGoo

Na. Pretty sure that is a thing by them just for Counter Strike. EAC is still the major wide spread anti cheat they have. Ah that sounds plausible since I require it for the german cs league.

Not all OTW weapons are supposed to be implemented at some point. Some are just imbalanced fun-toys not intended for proper play.

Free Easy AntiCheat when? Kinda re-branded to "Easy eSports" couple months ago

I argue that most of the time it isn't even the fault of the server and people just missed. As someone who watched his own gameplay on several occasions in the past it is just a matter of perception in the heat of moment. (Not saying the server doesn't go ape on you sometimes but you know...)

So you want to revert back to 2013 times (sadly pics are gone already)! Also your example of the current spread is wrong. The "cone" is basically a grid with a fixed number of pellets (maybe was one? dunno how many) in each part. However the location of those pellets is random.

Chat - I just love it to beat people with words after beating them with bullets prior! Close second Temptress - suppressed and accurate mmmhh

Very likely didn't even lose with them only getting 11/180 points - lol

Ah yeah the event where silvers suddenly had no issue facing golds while even actively joining gold districts. Going as far as grieving opposing golds by kicking their own gold teammates towards the end of the mission to deny points when getting shredded. I wouldn't mind it with hard segregation that doesn't' allow silvers in gold districts (and further tweaks). Finally some incentive to do good. Also while I won't rule out some errors in the counting of points I personally had no issue and believe most problems were caused by dishonest behavior and exploit attempts as per usual.

Remember those empty words that those individuals used to shift the blame on G1? Trying to justify their petty actions as some crusade for all the wrongdoings that happened under G1? Guess what? Scum is still scum and still the only constant. Weak beings struggling with their insecurities!

And that is where I simply disagree since you're bound to stumble onto some of the evidence, not all, if it really would be the case as proclaimed.

And that would be fine for as long as you don't claim otherwise- thats all! They want to let cheaters back in for a second chance? Fine, do that - that was the initial statement anyway - but don't claim to unban supposedly "innocent" people which are infamous throughout!

That is not what I have insinuated. I said that those veterans and players know for themselves (without internal access) that there are subjects where the statement simply cannot apply! Why? Because there exists evidence and there has evidence been sent to support so you cannot claim a non-existing documentation. So there is no room for speculation it is a fact that MattScotts statement cannot hold true for every case and thus he should avoid making such claims!

Let's just face it. This is the first statement by MattScott which starts to spread the seed of doubt. Any veteran or anyone who somewhat actively followed APB's community knows that this is bullshoot. There are several people who have admitted to cheating which got unbanned. Cases where individuals got banned multiple times with visible violations if you so chose to look - but the vibe that has been given all along is get as many players back as possible no matter the cost. At least be humble enough to not lie about it.

Seems to be the second lowest since the recording started. Don't understand the feel to falsely depict those numbers especially with the provided transparency about ticket workspeed/workload.

Weird... I don't remember that at all. Could you provide some evidence? Btw. Darrel was the basketball player. Was all I could find which seems to suggest that that "football injury" is more a tropical term since he didn't seem to play at all? I dunno

Literally different texts altogether. They always changed from location to location. Also I posted lore above quoted from a mail the player gets when leveling DD...

He also sat at a buildings ledge north of Violet to keep an eye on her! Oh ok. You good. What the fuck did Darryl kent do to devil dog? Darryl said to be optimistic about Lowyields. Prick!

Didn't know you can peek there on the left side in the first clip rofl

Don't listen to him he is one of the loud ones!

That's not what my sentence is saying. "The issue is that you bought it [the ACES Rifle] in a bundle for far cheaper than a standalone character version would be." So not only doesn't it bear reference to the all round price but merely the difference of the character bound ACES-R price and its hypothetical included bundle price.

What are your concerns? The most apparent for me is the mobility it might give stacked heavy weapons but then again you pay with it by sacrificing the ability to split your attackwidth. Another could be newly gained ways of access to certain areas but again I see it as a nice way to bring more creativity into the gameplay and it could also help balance some tricky spots.

Certainly a way of approaching it but then again how much cheaper? I assume you bought the item full price prior and get only a part reduction from the bundle and not 1:1? I'm not saying that there are no ways to make the whole bundle market work just that the way OP requests is not a wise/easy solution from a business standpoint.

Topics like 'Out of Bounds' mechanic and 'Penalty for Teamkilling' have already been mentioned. While certainly needed they were fixes which also removed quite a bit of fun and goofiness from the game outside of missions. Another one I would like to make you aware of is the 'Stacking People'. Just a short vid of what I refer to: I wonder do people think it would be fun to have it back? Could open up some interesting ways to play and give APB more of that special little something back.

But you can't just look at this one case. You would set a precedence which could vary very much from future cases. It's just how bundles work. Having said that it has been requested in the past to add account lifetime for bundles - could be one compromise.

The issue is that you bought it in a bundle for far cheaper than a standalone character version would be. The upgrade however calculates with that price so you can't just pay the usual difference since that would essentially leave room for exploits.