Weeb TheEpicGuyV2

This week's poll will be 2 polls instead (sorry in advance for the huge chunk of text for the questions) If you've been with apb for a long time, you will have heard the term "p2w" thrown around a lot at least once. This most likely stems from players being killed by weapons which are not available from contacts (could be wrong on this) There is the joker store, but aside from missing some armas weapons, there are varying opinions on the ease of access of weapons from it So the topic this week is making weapons from armas more accessible (but not too accessible to the point armas market becomes redundant). What's your opinion on the topic? The best way for LO to make changes that will be accepted is to voice our opinions in an easy analysable manner, so let's put our initial opinions out in the open for them

That's less of an issue with the jump modifier on it (it's tied in third worst jump modifier out of all ARs at 12 along with the Ursus, Frenzy & Scoped Ntec. The LCR has one of 13 in second and the issr-a is in first with a whopping 40) and more so to do with the gun itself The jump modifier nerf LO drew up for the ntec a while back before vaulting the idea would only have served as a stop gap method at best Wait how did the thread get derailed to about the ntec?

Let's be honest, we all know you're secretly complaining about a specific individual along with their viewerbase :^) Who said individual is can be up to your imagination

Regardless of whether you have premium or not, when you trial a weapon, a discount of 35% off is applied directly to the base price of the item. No other discounts are applied In other words, both premium and non-premuim players get a final discount of 35% off the trial weapon I'm pretty sure this is the only instance currently where a fixed discount is applied

Donate me 500k

This week's poll will be a little different from the other weekly polls. Instead of the standard 2 polar opposite options with an in-between option, this week's poll will be a simple yes/no question The topic this week is RIOT. I'm sure we all have our unique views and opinions on RIOT, however this thread isn't for them. You can leave your opinions and feedback at: For those that play-tested the mode, I ask you this single question: do you think RIOT will succeed?

Name and shame?

This time, to avoid talking about a topic that Matt has stated he has future plans for, let's throw a curveball (cooky I'm looking at you) If you've played apb for long enough, you'll know that there's a handful of guns that get little usage, and that an even smaller handful are non-exsistent in terms of use rate (but that can be a topic for another day) The gun, or rather, guns up for discussion today is none other than the Norseman series. What are your opinions on them? The best way for LO to make changes that will be accepted is to voice our opinions in an easy analysable manner, so let's put our initial opinions out in the open for them

Stop doing Cooky's job for him

Edit: so it completely slipped my mind that Matt had already stated that the threat system will be getting a change in the future (I'm sure someone has the post). Oops Last week there was no poll as Riot was made open to the public for a stress test truth be told, I just didn't have a topic ready off the top of my head If you've played apb long enough or have been on the forums long enough, you will have noticed a certain topic cropping up time and time again: dethreating. You might have also noticed in your play sessions that some players with silver threat perform better than players with gold threat (this is down to personal standards in the end) With that said, what's your opinion on the threat system? This isn't limited to just dethreating. It also includes how your threat is determined and how much weight it holds in matchmaking The best way for LO to make changes that will be accepted is to voice our opinions in an easy analysable manner, so let's put our initial opinions out in the open for them (This is a rather controversial topic so try to be neutral to others. We are all entitled to our own opinions)

Also the markers only appear after a player has first mugged a bunny/chicken. So players have to keep a keen eye out for them at the start of the round while driving around Typical this takes a minute, but as long as no one mugs a chicken/bunny, no markers will appear on the map

It can fire with a low district pop, just very rarely

It increases or decreases in proportion to the amount of other players in the district. So say in a district of just 4 people, the chosen one will notice getting hit by an hvr much more than say in a district of 15 people

Good. Just making sure

The heck you say?

This is a no uwu zone. Just for that, I'm adding a new option

You mean BST. We're currently in BST. UTC is an hour behind

hey if it wasn't for recycling these forums would be long dead

Might as well start calling these weekly polls now... If you've played apb for a solid few hours, you would have noticed majority of the playerbase using the same handful of cars, while others get next to no usage With that said, what's your opinion on vehicles currently? This includes their health, as well as the physics concerning them and their handling The best way for LO to make changes that will be accepted is to voice our opinions in an easy analysable manner, so let's put our initial opinions out in the open for them

Nani. I do remember inputting my email if I ain't mistaken. Oh well

Wait the tinfoil hat was sent out?

A) this is an overall population issue, not just Citadel B) go visit Jericho for a truly concerning population

Citadel is in trouble? Last I checked, it even had a second financial filling up, and that was within the last 3/4 days

@CookiePuss you seem to have a habit of not minding things that get nerfed in the end :^) Love you

Oh boy another one of these threads. See you all in the next one in a few weeks