vsb

elaborate

it most likely won’t be different, but there will be just as many people who do realize that things are (hopefully) better, so it balances out

a shortcut cheese method would be to simply double the available spawn points, i remember when they removed the faction restrictions on the old system it felt like night and day

forgot push to crouch

woops

frankly i don’t think any system revamp is going to be perfect unless someone goes through and manually approves each spawn point, there’s just too many variables for an automatic pass through to work imo im aware this would be a herculean task but in the end it would probably leave us with the best results on a side note i’d like to see the same thing down with objectives and drop off points

yeah and it’s wrong to punish those 25% a second time just because of the 75% who actually did something wrong i really don’t think this is that difficult to wrap your head around tbh

qft

issrb can also jump shoot with more accuracy then the current scout, for whatever that’s worth on a 4stk gun lol imo the obeya is perfectly competitive with the obir, they just have different playstyles - although i’m pretty sure the obeya has a faster ttk at nearly every range the 8stk at 100m isn’t something to be overlooked either

it’s apparently very hard to understand that there were false bans, and therefore you would effectively be punishing innocent players twice - once by getting false banned in the first place, and twice by resetting their accounts after they finally get unbanned

these things all have a delete button except percs maybe

you said stuff that needs to be added but then asked for deletes i am confused

yes he is support clearly gave him the option to pay the balance on the boxes he exploited in return for his account being unbanned, except now there’s a new support team and new rules and new owners and it’s unclear whether these new people will honor the old supports side of the agreement did you even read the op?

issrb is a little too good imo, it’s super accurate, it has a sub 1s ttk out to 90m, has pretty high hard damage, and it has no movement penalties

i mean that’s not really the issue here tbh he was told to pay x amount to have his account unbanned and he paid x amount, but now his account may or may not be unbanned, depending on how orbit handles promises made by the previous company

depends entirely on the situation tbh if they’re shawcoptering at 55mph around the map - sure, sit out the mission but i’m not going to stop playing or follow a teamate around to spectate him just because my opp has whispered me that said teammate is cheating

something something actions louder than words

am i dreaming

iirc it was 10 hours of any verifiable community service, and no one who applied followed the guidelines correctly

i mean, is there any legitimate reason to pit someone who isnt p5/n5 or in your mission/event? if someone doesnt want to deal with other players crashing into them i fail to see how it should matter what the other players want

it might be another case of just badly managed code iirc r6 siege also uses vivox and the ingame voip is very high quality, in my own personal experience at least

i can see this being a very difficult thing to code in correctly, how would this handle vehicle objectives? still think the easiest way to handle this is just allowing a toggle option, that way if anyone is really worried about griefing they can turn off collisions to do the mission and then turn collisions back on afterwards so they can get the "open world experience"

are we really going to pretend that even having to ask the question "is this racist" somehow means something is offensive? setting aside the fact that there are hundreds of actual offensive things that no one bothers to ask "is this racist" about, people have brought up valid reasons that effectively show 'unoffensive' things that could and would in fact be offensive and that is the slippery slope - where is the line drawn? where do we say "well its okay if this only offends this group" ? isnt it offensive in and of itself to say that one groups reactions are not equal to anothers? its really cool and all to dismiss this all with a slick phrase but these are pretty important issues imo

fair point but if we remove ingame voip how will my teammates open broadcast poor quality music while i attempt to make callouts

not everyone uses those, and it seems rather ridiculous to expect every random group to get together in a 3rd party program in order to communicate