GhosT

I don't doubt that. Though, think back to the first RFP changes they laid out. They didn't even need any testing, they were obviously bad changes just by reading them. That's where communication is key. The devs should chime into this conversations and find out why people say things they do, why a certain gun is broken and so on. If LO is using these districts to slowly approach changes now and learn about the game balance that way, so be it - it has to be done somehow. It's way better than flat out ruining shotguns, pushing them to live and ignoring them afterwards.

Boi, you have anger issues. And your rant about me and Revoluzzer is hillarious. I like how you decide to just randomly pick two out of the many people that want the N-TEC nerfed solely because they've been around for a long time, and then go "lol u guys are bad af xd" without ever seeing us play. Also funny how you think FC stats are noteworthy and consider someone as "good" or "skilled". It is rather easy to get to the top of the scoreboard in both FCs, especially with meta weapons. I can't speak for Revoluzzer as I've never seen him play, but without leaning myself too far out the window I can say after all these years I'm good enough to hold my grounds, even against some of the best premades. Sure there's people better than me, and I'm completely fine with that. Can't be the best player on earth, mostly because my hyper reaction sweat times are over as I haven't been a kid for quite some time now. Gotta say I do miss my BFBC2 and MW2 times. //Edit: Your "git gud" argument. Now what if I told you my opinion about the N-TEC has formed with me playing it for a long time, not getting wrecked by it and crying as a result of that?

That's actually a great idea. Gives those that want to test those weapons actual enemies in normal circumstances that you can test the weapons against. Downside is that they'd always have to add and delete test weapons.

Some are good, some are fine, some are absolutely stupid. Which isn't a bad thing, that's exactly what the test district is there for. Though they do have to work on their communication regarding those. It's always just a discussion between the community without any dev chiming in.

As far as I know it just matches you with whoever is also readied up in the district, with a little attention to threat levels. Can't get any better than this at the moment because there isn't really any player pool available to deliver fair matchmaking.

There's other SMGs that need to be changed, and the CAP40 being perfectly balanced is not one of them. Check out the ACES, Norsemen or the H-9.

One thing I really despise is the pistol reload animation and sound for all the bullpup guns in the game.

It used to pack quite a punch, but they unnecessarily nerfed it. As of now, it certainly isn't a good shotgun. Wasn't really a good choice before the nerf either, it shoots incredibly slow. Getting two shots into your target is hard enough and if you manage to get out a third shot it's a miracle you're still alive.

Zone control includes defending your team and objectives. Otherwise you wouldn't be controlling the zone.

I don't know, you tell me.

What a teamplayer you are. As a sniper it's exactly your job to cover your teammates and the objective.

Nah, but while aiming at or shooting at somebody, someone else could walk into your line of sight that could kill you, your team, or do the objective. You're gonna miss all of that if you use HMS over HS3.

I love tunnel vision!

One of the downsides is making that gun absolutely useless for like anything under 80 meters, I'd call that more than relevant.

Sorry that my aim isn't good enough to penetrate walls. A very short time behind cover and you've healed just enough HP to survive the 5th shot.

Ever used one? It's generally slower and can't really be auto fired at all, also becomes a 6 shot to kill very often when fighting against CA3 users as it barely has any overdamage.

What do you mean, even more of an upgrade? It's already a straight downgrade. Maybe they'll be on the same level after a N-TEC 5 nerf.

Couldn't have said it any better. The N-TEC doesn't even need drastical changes, just needs a little something done to it so it isn't as strong in cqc and long range as it is now. The only change I ever wanted for it was slower accuracy recovery so you can't spam it as much at range. It's just too easy to outgun weapons like the obeya even if the obeya started shooting first.

They are, though none of them are as strong as the N-TEC at all ranges, they mostly require more skill or awareness. The N-TEC just does everything a little too easily.

That's not how assault rifles work in APB, seeing as the N-TEC is the only one that strong.

Here we go again with the "if u lose" argument. It's not about losing or winning, it's more about how it's good enough to effectively fight close range guns (and long range guns) and still be impressively good at ranges these guns can't do anything at.

Classic Todesklinge stuff. Enemy: Best loadout You: Worst loadout And then you expect to win.. seriously?

Why is it that all your counter arguments are basically "lol ur bad git gud" and low key insults? Can't you defend your precious N-TEC wtih actual facts or what? I love it when people have no real arguments to defend their crutch. Yes, players will either stick to the slightly nerfed N-TEC or move on to FAR, NSSW, Obeya or whatnot, but all of the other options are at least a lot more balanced. Also, stop trying to make "lol pick an oca to beat ntec" an argument, the OCA can't do anything against an N-TEC outside of its comfort zone, while the N-TEC continues to shred.

Does anyone not use that command?

N-TEC is so easy I really don't see where it's any fun for more than a couple missions. Just slaughtering people on all ranges gets boring fast.