Slickmund

Puts a nice leash on your manpurse.

This is what the risk-free trial refers to, risk free, trial period in which they test the compatability and run some limitations on their software if deemed insecure to run it with all freedom it could have to fully function. By no means does this mean a "free" or inferior service that they offer. I've explained it in detail, I will not go to such same lengths. If you can not extract the data it is offering, that a different ordeal I will not get into again either. Like I mentioned before, this is not the appstore, this is the commercial world and how businesses interact, its a different scale and different customs.

They would make a support ticket to get unbanned. Posting on the forums would be a stupid move on their end because it will make them a target of suspicion. You think someone who is banned would want to make it public? Answer is no, it will not help his case and it will make him a target. Also, it is against the forum rules to discuss your bans on the forums, so if they were to post, the thread would be removed as soon as LO notices. You try to use my own words against me for some reason, without proper arguments behind it as well as completely ignoring my actual replies to that. I am not 100% sure as to how I come across to the average reader, but I am fairly sure you come across as someone who pull stuff out of his sleeve.

Like I said before, you state things you need to deliver proof on. The statements I made require me to quote Matt and Battle-eye's terms of service which is quite lengthy. I could do that, though I quoted the part about trial periods already earlier in this thread, but I have a feeling you will just try to google translate it again and it wouldn't make any sense to you. Because guess what, I'm not sure what language you are translating it to, but it rarely works well. The proof you ask for, I can not deliver. As I stated, LO doesn't release any information on bans. Which is why I suspect your claims are bogus as well.

You expect 10-30 players banned in case Battle-eye would actually do it's job. Alright, it is now clear to me you are an absolute authority on the subject of cheating, programming, statistics, logic, litteracy and ethical communication. All bow before Lord Potato, ruler of the interwebs. The only person alive which can use his brain apparantly. EDIT: Apparantly he is also a Diamond-grade lawyer/Universal-grade judge, so beware you scullian BXNNXD you.

I saw what you posted before, you said you got banned for having an inproper symbol, and you later on got a full week ban because you harassed a player with hackusations. Now whether those two statements were lies (stupid ones really) to use as arguments for your statements, or true, it still wouldn't suffice as proof. Both of those bans would be manual bans, which aren't related to Battle-eye at all, anti-cheat systems arent built to detect that kind of rulebreaking. So, proof please? Youre already a dixie in my book though. On the topic of logic, formal logic, I could formulate whether or not you are a lying potato or not, simulate it, and get a pretty unsurprising truth scheme out of it. No point in doing that really.

It keeps reposting my previous post each time, completely removing what I typed in so ye... Like BXNNXD points out, you present no proof, also you have no credibility, your understanding of English generally speaking seems to be lacking. I'd be a happy customer if you were to stop spreading misinformation.

Again, show me proof of this. Matt stated things differently then you are saying things here, I guess your English doesnt suffice to fully grasp the meaning behind his words. It does ban they have stated, and fairfight is still functioning as well, whether it is auto-banning or not I do not know, my guess would be no.

Alright forums acting weird, anyways. You show me proof of what you claim, and I will try to explain it to you if you still deem it necessary. Can't make these kind of claims without evidence, naturally, "oh some guy said he was cheating and didnt get banned" or "my friend tested it he didnt get banned" wont do, real proof, not just rumors. LO states they wont release any info on bans, so I am curious what you have in stock to back up your claims.

I have explained before what a 'trial' (not 'try' I mean c'mon) period would mean, read back a bit if you have to. I also play Rainbow Six Siege, and I can tell you from a programmers perspective, as well as a very experienced gamer's perspective, it doesn't mean a thing. How well an anti-cheat system works depends entirely on how the game's networking is done, only that. Siege is a well developed game in many senses, and the security levels are mostly due to their solid networking. Like I said before read back a bit if you want more details, but even IF APB has a trial period (which any game will have when they decide to get a BE license), it will not matter in terms of the quality of service provided by battle-eye. It is nothing like a "free, silver package, gold package" kind of system. It is simply a period in which BE is trying to prove their compatability with the license taker in which they offer a discount on the license. Free anti-cheat would only exist in the form of shareware that is trying to develop and gain a lot of data, BE is no such thing. Please think before you post as if you're an authority on the subject, posting is nothing like going to the toilet, if you don't mind me reminding you of that.

you say this "have either already spent a big buck on APB and is less less likely to willingly invest more, or simply isnt interested in spending at all" Yes i spend money in apb, but will i invest more in apb that is not on me that is on LO they make new items that i can buy? You would be called a "whale", because of your spending behaviour in APB. F2P games can rarely run on only whales, their concept needs to appeal beyond the die hard fan really for them to profit. And in a business, you gotta profit or atleast cut even, cutting even is rather risky in most sectors though.

I feel sorry for you, I've had days like that as well. Bad luck always finds a way to chainkill your hopes on the worst days. Cant be helped though, GL at trying to resolve the issues Matt.

You bunch fags, I never said I spent 50k. Personally, I think I spent about 1700 last I checked. We had 50+ active paying players at one point, all spent many hundreds, many spent more than me personally, but I know it had to be over 50k for just 2014-2016 alone... but punk patootie kids will talk shit, and not deliver as per usual. Cause well, punk patootie bitches be just that. 50k Isn't going to cut their expenses though, not even close.

In many situations it looks like someone snaps, like Cookie mentioned, there can be a lot of animation lag, or glitches. Sometimes you just walk about with your gun lowered whilst hip firing someone to a bloody pulp, happens to me, I see it happen, it happens. I haven't seen the video sadly, I just wanted to emphatize on the fact that animations in APB really can not be trusted at any time.

Funny fact about some deliberate dethreaters I know, they went from proper noob stomping dethreaters to barely scraping by silvers. Guess you get sloppy when it never gets challenging. Either way, banning deliberate frequent dethreating if possibly proven, sure Im in for that. Shouldn't get too pissy about having to play them though, they keep you on the edge, and you might learn a thing or two from em. I've always liked being the underdog in games, and I've always liked losing, I just think to myself: "Just one more week of losing to you and ill get you, oh Ill get you alright.".

No no no you got it all wrong. They should only match Bronze against Gold and Silver against T. That way as long as we get new players every day to feed the grinder everyone stays happy (Factoring out the 50% RQ's because of matchmaking of course, they dont count, they only played the game for max 10 hours because they only get matched against good players.)

you mean you had a different experience than me? thats impossible you must be lying different people all have the same experiences all the time You mean to say you have a different perspective than I? That is unethical because the world works exactly as I think and wish it to be, all the time.

General discussion is full of discussions, notifications about general issues or noteworthy things within the game. The original invite is in the Events section, but simply isnt read as much. Is it not 100% correct, yes, is it understandable, yes as well. Lets not play bureaucratic empire simulator here.

Maybe make sure the vents actually work next time? It's a miracle only 6 people died in that line.

Vocally when?

Well I for one am glad theres no voicechat/messages on these forums, if that's what you're referring to.

Presenting a compliment isn't exactly condescending, but alright, i'll refer you to a statement I made towards you in a different thread. I will say nice things about you, if I feel like it. Your objections to my freedom of speech and flattery are noted, pinned and scrapped.

id rather you not associate him with shitposting tbh, makes us shitposters look bad Your witty post-farming is widely appreciated, as are your occasional helpfull or informative posts. I do understand your desire to not be associated with this kind of behaviour though.

Whoa, easy there, king of the nerds! This is not a troll post. It's just merely a snarky way of reminding LO to fix things. Now simmer down, bucko. King of the nerds, clever, original, thoughtfull, more descriptive words to support my sarcasm. Anyways, I asked you some questions, because I will actually give you a serious reply and want to help you if I can. Reminding LO to fix things is unnecessary, they know what they bought into, they are working on it, they can't work and deliver on a scale the average player expects. No need to simmer down really, I wrote something to you, how you perceived what I wrote and with what emotions is on your end. As is the lag you have, I suspect. You could answer my questions, see if it helps. Or you could be a major twat and whatnot and just keep shitposting like you do, your call really.

Now enough with the backend munch talk really. Lets get into the subject. First ill ask you some questions so the issue can be pinpointed, rather than starting with the rant. Which server do you play on? Since when do you have these issues? What type of lag are you reffering to? Check with /fps, if its latency itll be shown in MS, packet loss could be a factor, screen freezes (or fps stuttering/drops) however are not considered lag, lag is strictly network related. Now for the rant part. If youre gonna go ahead and just call everyone who replies to your topic a backend munching hipster, why bother making a thread at all? If youre looking for an answer from LO staff itself, yes I know takes ages, you'll need to make a ticket. Community managers won't just give you an answer here, especially not the one you're looking for. Secondly, you can not state you represent the entire playerbase, on Citadel there is absolutely no server sided lag as of late. I can not speak for Jericho, but I have heard from plenty of Jericho players on this forum that their network issues had been resolved as of late as well, therefore you can not represent the entire playerbase. The majority that does speak, does not agree with you for as far as I have seen. IF Troll-thread: Why are you feeding toxicity?