Slickmund

Saves on wax if youre into that of course.

In that case scrap what I said.

Cap40 has a different effective range than an OCA and therefore shouldnt match the TTK of the OCA. Not to be an patootie but, they were by no means supposed to be equivalent, it is a JMB weapon, none of those are equal to the standard guns, they are supposed to be unique. I have no experience playing with the cap40, I have seen people talk about that gun however, and it didn't come across to me as if the cap40 was a bad gun, though easily outperformed by the OCA in real CQC. I hope that clarifies the matter for you, I am by no means an expert on those weapon statistic though, so I am not saying youre wrong and im right, this is what I have heard.

What about waffle's with ice cream then?

Imitation of... you in this case? Now you are merely being silly. Stating my replies to you are reshaped replies of your own thrown back at you is a level of sillyness I can not comprehend indeed. You seem to resort to different forms of phrasing of: You can not comprehend what I am saying, it is beyond you. Without any arguments to support your statement. If you fail to understand the actual critisism I present towards you, then I see no point in continueing this conversation with you any longer indeed. If you want to tag me a coward, or sore loser over that, be my guest. I guess it would just show you have yet to experience how one should discuss a matter, and how one can not win an argument, because it misses the point of argueing in the first place. The conversation you seek is a debate, I do not. I am not claiming my victory, nor my loss in this conversation, it is irrelevant and pointless to me. I am trying to make you understand how belittling others in the way you do does not have any benefits besides feeding self entitled behaviour. You drew the conclussion that I was immitating you because I said I thought I was doing a better version of your behaviour, which was to reflect your own behaviour which is a very effective psychological move to make, much like putting a mirror in front of a child that throws a tantrum. Now don't get me wrong, I am not calling you a child that throws a tantrum, that would be ludicrous. But I am saying you speaking of comprehension and controversy comes from your own misinterpertations. I feel no need to fight with you, but I do feel a need to call out someone on his behaviour on the spot as it happens. You can deem that whatever you like, I think of it as good morals, and it is not something I can apply 24/7. Enough is enough I'd say. Let's bury the hatchet, I can see where you come from and I will agree to having stepped out of line myself if you could do the same.

Controversial you mean? Sometimes it's unclear to me whether we speak the same language or not with the way you speak and seem to perceive whatever is written. You assuming I couldn't "compete at this level" implies your statements thusfar have made more sense than my own. I fear the judges of that as of yet, are only you and me, deeming any conclusion made irrelevant since it is only your word against my own. I stated you are losing my interest, and that you make me feel superior over you in the sense you try to claim superiority over others. I am sorry if me thinking I am better at what you're trying to do come's across as offensive to you.

Appreciated.

If you dislike me defending you in such ways then tell me and I'll try to refrain from doing so. Tackling this kind of behaviour or atleast attempting to is simply bound to my character really, I can not make any promises related to that. EDIT: I suspected as such. You project the idea of making ridiculous assumptions onto me now do you, so in other words I had to put the words in your mouth for you to be able to defend yourself from my critisism. Yes the way I act right now could be deemed "White Knight" ish, I take no offense in that really. How you came to the conclusion I was self entitled is a mystery to me, but the follow up assumption about my age clarifies your standing in the discussion. Sadly, I am 24, time goes quickly from my point of view. You found an unoriginal way of calling me immature, which is quite the cliché thing to do in these type of arguments. Hats of to you pal, the self entitlement does kick in now, I feel like I am towering over you currently, and with that, I've already gotten bored with you. From here on out ill refrain from replying to your insensitive replies, as you put little thought into it, I shall have little thought of you.

Change "Brutally honest" to "far-fetched" and I might agree. On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion really, appart from the real post count farming BXNNXD does when he doesn't find a thread interesting enough, I see him contribute quite a bit. Low quality would mean he puts no thought into his responses, which is true in the case of post farming. But just as frequently I see him posting walls of text, being informative on various subjects and sometimes even going as far as clarifying context on quotes which I know takes ages because of how poorly this text editor works. Does he spam? Yes. Does he do only that? No, certainly not. I see him contribute more than the average forum user which is why I deem him a decent fella. You are entitled to your own opinion of course.

warframe? you know the game that has over 100x more players than this? the game g1 even used to host when it was at a rough spot at the start? sorry, i have 200iq insane FeelsWeirdMan Anyone intelligent realizes the IQ system, and especially it's form of testing, doesn't even scratch the surface of the depth behind intelligence. Your IQ is as phony to me as the reputation system on the forums is to you, me alike, I never cared for any reputation system. You try to sound clever, but all you come across as is edgy really. You make a lot of grammatical errors, yet you do have higher than average grasp of the language, I would find it fair to assume English isn't your native language and as such I will not discredit you for your mistakes. Your behaviour which comes across as a superiority complex on the other hand, I can not appreciate. To me you come across as a simpleton who took a liking to anything related to a higher form of intelligence, yet you have no understanding of the implications of said intelligence and the full weight of it's complexity.

What part of making uneducated , ungrounded, pessimistic assumptions about someone else their life based solely on post behaviour is savage exactly? To sum up his story about BXNNXD's life, Finds his posts low quality Assumes he only plays FC (Prejudice, which is wrong, BXNNXD has stated before he enjoys missions mostly, if I recall correctly) Assumes he has no responsibilities in life Assumes he upvotes his own posts to increase like-count Assumes his self respect solely stems from those likes (That sentece was really poorly constructed btw, upvotes you give yourself = the only respect you have of yourself?) Finds the reputation system pointless Assumes he has a fleeting design career Im sorry, you think of that as savage? And Tennogrineer thinks highly of himself for coming up with that shit? Should I perhaps do a similar post about him? I can storm up just as ridiculous of a baseless assumption storm with quite a bit more harsh conclusions in there. I dont see the point in giving credit to such toxic behaviour really, but I'd be happy to top him off if thats what you want.

The power of assumption is strong with this one.

Cookie is still ahead in the likeability race, hes got a likeability of 18%! @LO Nerf pls

I'm not going to indulge any further, you do you, I'll do me. To me it just seems awkward to find the game less enjoyable over a lack of social aspects, whilst not being willing to look where you can actually find it.

Im sorry dude, but I play quite a bit of FC, Silver districts as well, I dont see any cheaters, besides the 2 I mentioned. I wonder how anyone can think to themselves their opposition is using aimbots and triggerbots. If a suspect misses 1 shot, thats already proof of him not aimbotting, do you consider that when targetting someone with hackusations? Either way, youre full of it. Conversation terminated.

On Citadel, on bronze servers I have yet to run into a cheater. On silver districts I have ran into 2, both blatant speedhackers. I have been playing a lot over the passed 2 months, 400 hours actually. I don't suspect players of using aimbots, triggerbots or wallhacks because I have experienced plenty by now just how close to perfection a player can get in terms of that.

What server and which districts do you play on?

Dojima Ichizoku The Yakuza wannabe group Greetings fellow shoplifters and notorious trashcan vandalists, you have done well, you have found your way to the doorway that leads to a better lifestyle, Dojima Ichizoku will guide you from here on out. Your interest in us is a given, much like how a crane craves fish the superior criminal craves the Yakuza lifestyle which of course only Dojima Ichizoku can provide, now the question arises, is that interest mutual? To answer that question we will have to investigate the matter, let's start out with some formalities. Kindly answer these questions and post them below or send them to me personally in the form of a PM if you are interested. Sincerely, Oyasan, Kazaku Dojima Post may be prone to editing over time

Eww I'm too solo for clans So let me get this straight, you want to joke with people, troll with people and meet people. But you are too solo for a clan, a group of players that enjoy playing together. I fail to see the logic in this, to me it sounds like you should join Facebook or Twitter rather than play APB.

I loved Chivalry to death really, and I played it very competitively. I do wish they would have found a way to make the game more appealing to the more casual player and give them some kind of safe space from the tryhard. To be fair, I was a real tryhard for my first 2k hours there. First 200h was a lot of frustration because I was still climbing the skill ladder in the game and learning it's mechanics, I got into it on release luckily so the ammount of people that were blatantly superior than me at the time wasn't that overwhelming. I am a good loser though, I learn a lot from losing and as such I don't mind being on a losing streak (up to a certain point of course). I remember evenings where I'd duel one or a couple of guys for the entire evening, sometimes more than 5 hours in a row, getting my arse litterally handed to me on a platter not letting me get past winning maybe 1/40 duels. But the satisfaction after I overcame that, oh the joys of it. When playing agains the average player in a team objective game, being able to dance around and take on 5+ people at a time with a decent chance of winning it or atleast making a multi-kill, so satisfying really. I worked really hard for it I'd say, like most skilled Chivalry players, but it sure didn't help the player base. I did a lot of noobstomping myself before realizing I maybe shouldn't tryhard on each occasion because it would take the fun out of it for the opposition. I learned a lot from that game, learning progress wise and socially speaking, all game related of course. Sorry about rambling on about an entirely different game btw, Chivalry just really has a special place in my heart and I am overcome by joy just remember those days and talking about it.

I can somewhat relate to this, I also tend to think there's less english speaking players currently. Have you thought about joining a clan to improve on this?

The internet is a bit like gossip of the olden days. You make a statement without evidence to support the statement, spread it, repetition of the statement piles up and therefore it will become true for the majority. He can not prove you wrong, he will not prove you wrong, but someone will end up saying you are wrong and by default because someone agrees with your opposition his statement is justified in their experience. Much like people tend to think amongst the lines of 'good' and 'bad'. Life is a lot simpler that way, rather than having to judge each color by every tint in it you can just call it black or white, much of this behaviour rooted to our instinct or as some like to call it, though I deem it ridiciously fancy, human nature. Abstract thinking is not a given, it would be wisdom not to expect it from your opposition in a discussion, though underestimating your opposition would be rather unwise as well. Bottom line is, many things are controversial the more you zoom in on it because many things consist of many factors making for a rather complex outcome. It is unnatural for most to assume complexity of something perceived is beyond their own perception and or knowledge.

I work at a restaurant currently. By these standards I should put on my tin foil hat and start warning my colleagues about the pending demise on each day we have a customer less than the previous. Because apparantly thats how statistics work, you ask graph X question Y, look for anything that remotely supports Y through X and disregard all irrelevant information. They dont teach you this in schools, only on the APB forums. I better sign my little cousin up for this course.

"This was a joke right?"

This was a joke right?