CookiePuss

Well great ... Now I CAN'T be mean to you.

>The joke >Your head

You misunderstand. It used to be client sided, now it's server sided. So you'd now have to commit the very serious crime of hacking the APB servers to accomplish it. (Surely you know cheats only effect client sided stuff? So things like health, weapon damage, bloom, and RNG cannot be effected by cheats)

>2012 Now we are going backwards in time. Spread has been server sided for years now. After work I'll dig up the dev blog explaining this, maybe then you will stop spreading misinformation.

Ugh... Give me a bit to pull up the dev post on no spread.

>2014

Mods seem pretty legit to me.

Don't forget the unique tagger weapons. While not giving an advantage, it's def a sore spot for some people.

I cant help you seeing my posts, but I'll stop commenting on yours.

I agree.

Adjusting the weapons and bringing them into balance so that these accounts dont go to waste seems pretty fair to me. I doubt any of these players would rather their accounts be useless.

The most important thing is to try when you play. So long as you do that, it doesn't matter if you end up qualifying for bronze or silver districts. Its only an issue if you purposefully lose matches and do poorly in order to deflate your threat so you can play in a district in which you do not belong.

Wtf you blocked me???

Maybe we should.... RIOT!!!

Just move closer to the server. GG EZ.

If you can find her, Tiggs would probs do it again.

If district chat is anything to go by, im super "speshul".

I felt the same way tbh, but I think in the end it was more important to LO that they be transparent about who we are. GMs need the anonymity because they can and do take action against players, whereas all we do is test stuff.

There will always be threat levels, as that is how matchmaking is done.

I would not.

The most recent exploit allowing for speedhacking has been patched out, yes. This is how cheats work, cheaters find one exploit, devs fix it, cheaters look for another and so on and so forth. But my point was you are claiming things exist currently, and yet cannot show any proof to back it up.

I mean... Cool down timers are an issue as well as the Fang. So we aren't completely free of p2w aspects. And if he's an old player the Nano used to be p2w as well as the Troublemaker. ... Buncha booliez

lol no, he was very public about it in /d his strategy was to forfeit any long missions like creme de la crime entirely, as well as any defend missions (I do not recommend this, it makes teammates very angry)