CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 (edited) There's a rumor going around that some genius decided to let player volunteer GMs start banning other players. Please tell me this isn't true. Edited July 6, 2019 by CookiePuss Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ninjarrrr 255 Posted July 6, 2019 nah they got no powers dont think u have anything to worry about Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FakeBungo 248 Posted July 6, 2019 these are anonymous gms? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShaiShai 130 Posted July 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, largeAPBgamer said: these are anonymous gms? if there are, they don't do anything at all, every time i am on, i face cheaters, i do report them but that's also a place holder as it does nothing , its sad, little orbit is loosing / lost this game to the cheaters and if you do complain , someone will come and say "i don't see cheaters your just bad" its amazing how someone can get 30kills when the rest of their team can only get 5 and people go "he not cheat dur dur" they also get all the way to 255, sad, very sad 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrChan 337 Posted July 6, 2019 20 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: There's a rumor going around that some genius decided to let player volunteer GMs start banning other players. Is this something that came from some sort half believable source, or just something that someone came out with in District chat with literally no backup at all? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, MrChan said: Is this something that came from some sort half believable source, or just something that someone came out with in District chat with literally no backup at all? I dont think it can be called a rumor if there is proof. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MACKxBOLAN 431 Posted July 6, 2019 when they got me on that Temp 24hr, for Hate speech. A player complained to a gm in pm. The Gm then turned over the concern to Matt. And He reviewed it and made the decision. and I support his decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted July 6, 2019 1 minute ago, CookiePuss said: I dont think it can be called a rumor if there is proof. Show the proof, don't make it so long, just post it, or you are worried about something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 1 minute ago, lTheDarkness said: Show the proof, don't make it so long, just post it, or you are worried about something? I am worried LO is letting players ban other players anonymously. Sadly I don't even get hackusated, so I think I'm safe regardless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, CookiePuss said: I am worried LO is letting players ban other players anonymously. Sadly I don't even get hackusated, so I think I'm safe regardless. Alright, i understand what you talking about, but (i repeat), where is the proof of that happening? You can't be worried for something if that don't exist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mitne 724 Posted July 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: I am worried LO is letting players ban other players anonymously. Sadly I don't even get hackusated, so I think I'm safe regardless. Just show the damn proof. Even on Discord. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fortune Runner 796 Posted July 6, 2019 10 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: I dont think it can be called a rumor if there is proof. i do not know about the current rumor , but a few months ago i heard one like this and then we had a ban wave. i do not know however if those two were related to begin with but MattScott did make a public statement back then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrChan 337 Posted July 6, 2019 12 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: I dont think it can be called a rumor if there is proof. Maybe I should ask a different question then: Is your source dependable, or is it just some bloke trying to stir the shit? @MackxBolan, what you described though is not a volunteer GM issuing a ban. It's a volunteer GM elevating a complaint to an appropriate individual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 Just now, MrChan said: Maybe I should ask a different question then: Is your source dependable, or is it just some bloke trying to stir the shit? Just some blokes, yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ForeverCrooked 29 Posted July 6, 2019 congrats you fell for the bait Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrChan 337 Posted July 6, 2019 9 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: Just some blokes, yes. Well, taking that reply at face value, why are you listening to shit complete randomers come out with? You're smarter than that. Of course, that is assuming face value for the reply. For some reason, I'm inclined to think the 'some blokes' are blokes you know and put more value on what they say, than what x420noscope69x says in District chat. Why you wouldn't just say "yeah, the person who told me normally doesn't tell fibs" is beyond me. It's not like I'm asking you to ID the person. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiskeyTangoFoxX 280 Posted July 6, 2019 15 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: Just some blokes, yes. So instead of asking official sources directly, you instead make a stink about it on the forums where you have maybe a 50/50 chance of getting an answer and a 100% chance of causing a scene. You should know better than this by now, unless you really are just doing it for the attention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nanometic 265 Posted July 6, 2019 Careful, kotaku might catch wind of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 45 minutes ago, WhiskeyTangoFoxX said: where you have maybe a 50/50 chance of getting an answer Lmfao, I wish it was a 50/50 chance. 45 minutes ago, WhiskeyTangoFoxX said: a 100% chance of causing a scene Can hardly blame me if folks get upset at letting players ban other players. 45 minutes ago, WhiskeyTangoFoxX said: unless you really are just doing it for the attention. I doubt anyone, myself included, cares about getting your attention. 49 minutes ago, MrChan said: For some reason, I'm inclined to think the 'some blokes' are blokes you know and put more value on what they say The rumor came from players I do not know, and whom do not know each other. Just curious if yet another bad decision has been made. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nitronik 348 Posted July 6, 2019 Seems like the only difference between LO and G1 at this point is that LO makes exceptions for more likeable people I guess Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gordIsMyName 104 Posted July 6, 2019 this is indeed interesting... "with great power comes great responsibility" i agree that giving the ban hammer out to "players policing players" is a questionable solution. neutrality would be a really tough thing to keep in check. feels like the community has a view of GM's as powerless, meaningless beings. that has also been my experience in dealing with them in the past. another layer of hoops to jump through for help that do not provide any real actionable response. i may be a tad out of step with things, but without some form of 'teeth', why is LO investing time even using them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsb 6171 Posted July 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Glaciers said: vetoed guys seriously Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted July 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, Glaciers said: guys seriously Well this is awkward. I have Lixil blocked on discord. Anyways, go ahead and lock this thread up Flight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
