vsb

i assume name & shame is more to prevent people from just claiming other people are cheating/scamming/griefing/etc the same way unsubstantiated claims can get you sued for libel/slander irl (at least in some countries), on the forums they can get you a warning

you obviously feel very strongly about this

your post is 98% uncontributory, and your numbers are off since at least 25% of my posts are in suggestions realistically tho, what is there to add? “friendly reminder that no anticheat will catch 100% of cheaters” ? theres nothing any of the community can add to this obviously inflammatory thread so why isn’t it a DM to orbit staff?

i try very hard not to make any sense, i should be rewarded with post count for that but for real it doesn’t really make sense that posting in offtopic doesn’t change post count, it’s still part of the forums

i’m pretty sure there’s so many russians because innova shit down and g1 waited a year to spin up nekrova i cant blame the russians for not wanting to abandon eu accounts that they’d spent time and possibly money on tbh

am i?

i’ll cut you nice to see the meme is still alive lmao

are you asking me specifically?

iirc nekrova and citadel are located in the same facility, the only reason there’s a “russian” server is because innova had different weapons/stats and g1 didn’t want to be bothered with either changing the differences or dealing with the community pushback from changing (or not changing) the differences

sounds good

low yields are a straight upgrade to frags in player lethality, the only “downside” is less damage but given low yields are still a 2 grenade kill (and 3 low yields output more damage than 2 frags in less time), 200 less damage is negligible at best so when a one weapon has its own niche and bumps another weapon out of that weapons niche as well it’s generally considered unbalanced it also takes several hundred hours to unlock low yields (id like to see them added to grenadier role progression instead), so at any given time a large percentage of the player base is at the disadvantage of not even having low yields as an option

in the end a lot of balancing is just personal opinion tbh that said, the downvote is probably because op gave pretty decent reasons why loyos should be nerfed

as far as im aware the ue4 upgrade isnt dependent on ue3.5, and the only reason we're getting ue4 is because epic is discontinuing support for ue3

you could ping them @Lixil @MattScott chances are they'll just tell you to hit support immediately, since it sets a bad example to handle tickets on the forums

Engine Upgrade is what hes abbreviating here i think

this wouldn’t really solve the problems that the test districts have

u a real one

there’s no option for ‘neither’ ?

rip random pug teammates yelling at me to stop ruining the mission while they bottom frag

friendly reminder that i would be willing to pay for either a character slot for each character merged to a single account, or a flat rate based on how many items/characters are transferred during account merging

rng =/= challenge aiming and tracking a moving player is a challenge, rng is an artificial barrier that punishes players regardless of how well they play

doesnt really make any sense, especially since theoretically all the weapons are supposed to be balanced it also makes no sense to effectively punish players (since score affects mission rewards) for playing the best the possibly can

its a good idea, no reason for asylum to have contacts but not baylan

wait what? that doesnt make any sense at all lmao