BlatMan

This method no longer works on Linux either since SARD requires the kernel part of the anticheat running.

I haven't been able to reproduce that UI bug, and I'm usually pretty good at finding bugs. Someone in SPCT said it's related to having contacts or other UI stuff enabled. I had a friend use the exact graphics and game options I have set, yet they still experienced the bug. Watch it be related to something stupid, like the character login screen. I use a different login screen to skip the long loading time. Doesn't matter. I still can't launch the game on Linux, nor can anyone who uses the Steam deck. Well, technically it's possible, but I rather not attempt to bypass an anti-cheat that's so unpredictable that it even kicks legit Bronze players.

No shit. They purposely put that message to be vague. They could have shown the generic ban code, or even better, not banned the account at all and instead generate a customer support ticket to look at it. I thought that's what they were going to do since they seem iffy about banning players to begin with. Come on LO, at least be consistent. Then again, I guess random is technically consistent if the result is always random.

In the past, my game crashed if I switched districts too many times, even after the 64bit update. I wonder if the servers have the same issue with players constantly switching districts due to the cross-district matchmaking.

The range wasn't the problem with the Scout. The problem was you can hit players while jumping behind walls. Besides, the reason the Scout's jump shot was nerfed is because Reloaded wanted to milk the whales. They released the Dogear in the same patch, which has the ability to jump shoot.

"If we have 100% confidence that you are cheating, then you can be banned at our discretion. We have found that there are some players who cheat at a level there is no other solution. We have to ban them. It's unfortunate, but we can't ignore it. Cheat at your own risk. You may lose your account." In other words, you will ignore players who are 100% cheating. If you were really going to put in any effect, you will have said "will" instead of "can" and "may"

Does your mouse have custom profiles per game? Maybe that's interfering. I can't think of anything else.

Green? Do they play 1 mission, then go afk for the next 100? Seriously, green is much harder to hold than bronze if they're actually participating in the missions.

What broke this time? I'm just curious.

True. EAC wasn't any better and they allowed it. Then again, there's like what, 4 people including myself? I don't spend money on the game, and probably won't with current management.

Idk how SARD can support Linux without opening security holes. The best thing to have is server sided detection, but I doubt LO will ever get that working. Remember phasing for matchmaking? That never happened.

I've been here since 2012 or maybe even 2011. The majority of dethreaters were silver threat, but they got gold because they didn't have better players to fight in the lower threat districts. The people complaining about them are people who expect the game to play itself.

I think Matt is just really good at finding stupid investors.

I remember one who's aim kept getting locked to consumables. Must have been a free cheat.

Back in 2012, your notoriety affected your mission bonuses. I wouldn't mind seeing that feature return.