RovingFox

Man... I wanted to write a wish..... I ended up in an existential crisis.

Right now I feel like I want to smack a very specific person who started all of this. Not in an angry way, in a very educative way.

I used visa 1 week ago and I didn't have any hidden cost. I took the 10 dolar pack, my bank account is in -10 dolars.

I like to imagine thats Scott right now.

The stream was a great idea, it just needs a few tweaks like maybe solo queuing, new account.

Improve don't remove, move forward not backward you apes.

Stay on topic, no self advertising.

I personally do not agree in mixing high skilled players with low skilled players, even if the team is balanced. For low skill ones its crap cuz he hardly has any 1v1 chance against anyone resulting in unsatisfying gameplay. And the high skill ones will whine about their crap team member and how he is the biggest noob. I believe this suggestion might bring even more toxicity.

As I said before, just open conflict is not the answer, it will become a massacre from the perspective of low skill player. Also its not recommended to hurt that player base because that player base its mostly made of new players. You need those if you want to revive the game. That is why I suggested another type of matchmaking when you join the district.

Thank you for the observation, I hope its more clear now.

I personally have no problem with open conflict but that is because I can handle the majority of the player base. But I think you guys over estimate a low silver and underestimate a high gold. Open conflict will be a massacre.

I understood your suggestion, no, english is not my native language (if it matters anyway), no, this is not what I am suggesting,

I don't see the link between my suggestion and maintaining the threat percentages. Regardless, I don't see how this improves matchmaking. Might actually hurt it, depending on how it is implemented. Scratch that. It makes a nice visual effect but no matchmaking effect.

Yes, I know they are planning to add phasing, and I can't wait for it, but it will require a lot of work. I am hoping for my suggestion to fit somewhere between this pile of crap and our salvation. A quick fix and easy fix until we get a better matchmaking.

+1

Yep, its a requirement to be on any forums: whine like there is no tomorrow. But I'm looking forward to flaws in my suggestion.

Yes in a way is free district and in case it is abused they could change from the current "stalker" like friend system to a one that requires both to accept. I don't say the system I'm proposing is perfect, doubt there is a perfect system except for the phasing one which requires a lot of work. But it sounds better and less abusive then the current one that contains dethreaters and silver districts filled with golds.

Join your friend from Group&Friends tab.

In any business, dealing with clients it's like cleaning droppings.

Pls no... I love it!

Being banned cuz of wrong hackusations is the ultimate honour.

Nein Nein Nein Nein! It would be horrible!

I am not sure to what you are referring but I don't see a problem to why not to play with whomever you want.

Regarding the current matchmaking issue. Would it be a good idea to remove the Advance tab in district selection and let the game choose a district for you with people of equal threat? I am not very familiar with how the threat level works but from what I know, there is a number behind that color(a skill number, MMR). The game can use that to put you in a district with equal or similar skilled players. And if that's not enough it could take into account even district pop or the gap between the lowest skilled player in that district and the highest. Edit: Friends can still join each other through the Group&Friend tab.

Probably fucked up somewhere. Damn they are bad at math.