Jump to content

Sayori

Members
  • Content Count

    648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

273 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. He wasn't banned outside the ruleset at all, but the ruleset had stuff that probably shouldn't be there and he replicated the conditions. I've played(and majority of playerbase) under FairFight for thousands of hours and I never managed to trigger it so I'm just going to say that this is rare and if he didn't know the rules he would have never been banned(most likely) Without clarification on what was the rule, how many people triggered the rule, how many times did they trigger it before getting banned(because bans were manual, except few), how many of them triggered other(proper) rules in combination, this statement is useless, it's a paperweight, stop throwing it around trying to discredit FairFight. And just because someone didn't cheat on their main accounts, doesn't mean they didn't cheat on alts and got busted. Btw playing properly doesn't include glitching under map during events. Just saying....in case you ever did that
  2. No, it wasn't good enough as server-side anti cheat is never going to be good enough. If anything, those quotes from Matt Scott prove that FairFight WORKS because he managed to trigger some really stupid and rare rule by replicating the conditions that had to be made. Of course it's an issue, but since he doesn't say how many times it was triggered and by whom it's just not good to use the statement to prove whatever point. So the issue is the rule, not like FairFight is not good.
  3. You forgot something very important, but it's ok, no need to post it because it's against your narrative I guess... If this rule is so very specific that chances to trigger it are thinner than lottery, he knew about it, did what it had to be done. And I'd say this was very rare rule to trigger considering majority of players didn't get banned but certain people...some over and over again. This really invalidates the entire test... But hey, lets keep getting things out of context.
  4. Your ticket response time is not just where you don't want it to be at the moment. it hasn't been for 2 years. The current response time of 3.5 weeks is simply unacceptable. I was sort of keen on that, until I read a report from 2015 which states LO has almost 100 employees and 50 million USD annual revenue. So this is clearly not "LO is small company and doesn't have the resources" Anyway, glad you give perma bans...if you detect any decent cheat that is. My expectations happened - influx of cheaters, old names and "new" names, same people going 20+:1 in FCs. I still see that guy whom I reported a while ago and got response you will investigate? Guess not going to happen since he's SPCT , right?
  5. Say what you want about G1 but at least they had a forum post about it and events. A true american company who loved America. That ain't happening with LO. But it's ok, they would make "Community standards" thread and bring divisive politics and make donations to BLM so they bail out arsonists who have assaulted other americans and their right for private property. So happy independence day to all americans who love their country and don't destroy statues inb4 post deleted and I'm given a warning for bringing politics even though they do it themselves
  6. For 3 days ban I'd say it was for toxicity, bu then that permaban makes me think you got a warning for cheating. Make sure your brother didn't have access to the laptop ... or Clara. Damn Clara. But personally, I'd ban you for buying 2000€ laptop too.
  7. The game uses api to communicate, so I highly doubt it's nvidia's fault per se. And I can't even find any other games with this issue. The whole "64-bit" theory is just lol. You have 64bit cpu and windows 7/10 64bit and you are able to run 32 bit software... LO better finally look into this and say something because. If you guys wait for the engine update so this problem disappear, you are going to have a bad time - it's not coming any time soon.
  8. - Mom, can I have Shini - No, we already have Shini at home At home:
  9. It's one thing to hold your expectations, and it's another you don't get a chance to get disappointed. Can't say I'm looking forward another beta but it's almost amusing that people try to defend LO for not doing their homework.
  10. What do you expect ? We live in a post-truth world. And there's a guy saying that there are 50-60 people in so it's not a fail? Yeah ? And how many people are trying to get in? This beta wasn't decided yesterday, had plenty of time to prepare including backup plan but here we are again - convincing me that UE will be a giant flop. What I'm supposed to do? Enter my login credentials every few minutes? And this is the result of my 3 attempts to get in social
  11. Most of the time can't login, if I login, then I can't connect world server, and I connect by some miracle then can't load in Social. Sorry, I will pass.
  12. Yes and none of them was LO's staff. I don't want to play guessing games. The blog page doesn't explain it clearly, it seems like overly complicated system, things could be much simpler. But I'm sure this is going to benefit new players soooooooooo much ...because they read blog pages and forums /s
  13. Someone needs to elaborate. Does this mean 5000 JT pack is 10% chance? And can I choose the weapon or it's completely random because if that's the case then this update is horrendous.
  14. Sure, they have QA... probably like two people and of course there's you...who test for a bit on the weekend and still have reported a lot of things. So just imagine all of us getting access and start discovering new bugs.... You are kinda proving my point though, there's already bottleneck at LO's side because there's not enough work force. Thank you for explaining how software development and bug management works. Totally haven't been involved in such things /s I know, right? I crash too so it's like I'd like this to be fixed too? Actually don't need UE to fix this problem. Just so you know, it's not entirely nvidia's fault. https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis565/LECTURES/Lecture2 New.pdf http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~jan/mcs572/mcs572notes/lec28.html
  15. No, I have no idea how many but I know 20 people who do this part-time, unpaid and not professional are not able to finish this at decent completion level . So yes, I really doubt most bugs have been discovered, it's most likely just on the surface. Will see soon ™ anyway
×
×
  • Create New...