-
Content Count
46 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Monolillity
-
Hahahaha good point. It's coming up US-East about now right? Enjoy people. Yeah time for some more champagne! I love the rush you get from good champagne. Only time of the year we have some anyway. The feeling isn't comparable with any other beverage I know. Cheers people. Sincerely, Monolillity
-
Will APB ever be what RTW intended it to be?
Monolillity replied to myrothas's topic in General Discussion Archive
Almost as if poor RTW is still getting trolled . Hey if APB ever gets a racing track I wonder if we could still have passengers, to shoot other contenders / repairing? Lol. If you think about it, APB still has so many options to try, as always just time and money are the limiting factors. Really makes me wonder what this year will bring though. Go LO !! Sincerely, Monolillity -
Is everybody happpppyyyy. new year? 2019 omg omg omg <-- super old tech! Sincerely, Monolillity
-
Will APB ever be what RTW intended it to be?
Monolillity replied to myrothas's topic in General Discussion Archive
I'll go with 'very'. And yes, "If you play good you can play here for free or even earn some real life $" didn't turn out to be the best idea on an anonymous Windows based internet hosted game. Not everyone will play / act fair. And that idea attracted a boatload of these people. Whole clans. Some of those players are still here yes. What a view to take. Sincerely, Monolillity -
Will APB ever be what RTW intended it to be?
Monolillity replied to myrothas's topic in General Discussion Archive
It's likely not wrong, but RTW was done for before they could do anything new so the 'official' statement became: nope. This map wasn't made for lols. And done for, mostly, mostly, thanks to a great toxic community exploiting their real-money/game-currency monetary system, let's always add that. What a mess. What a loss! -
Still a serious issue. This drives away new players as well.
-
@MattScott You could be making a serious mistake with adding the new leveling contacts on the same old districts with this low of a population; - The gap between lower-level and 195 mod-unlocks is already huge, and still these people have to fight each other. This already could be considered totally unfair to new players. - The reason all original mod-unlocks below 195 are all done at lower, fast-to-reach, levels was very intentional towards keeping things balanced!!! The old G1 didn't care about it. From mobile car repair torches, detonators, car surfing, taggers, better grenades configs, the list goes on and on. The original idea was: unlock everything fast so you can switch out any configuration for the battle, being able to wear a multiple of modifications at one time takes progress (or later on, Armas purchases). - If these new 3.x contacts unlock new mods for even higher levels the gap between lower level members and high level ones becomes even more ridiculous and you'll drive away any new people at a fast pace because of dumb unbalanced game-play gaps created without understanding how low VS max level game-play was originally balanced. I'm not talking about veterans who re-roll on new accounts knowing every inch of this game with perfect aim. I'm talking about new people who check out your game. Vets do need something new to do, but -for crying out loud- focus on balance with new people in mind as a good change; G1 made the mistake with 195 mods, calling the fight balanced with newer players is now already quite ridiculous, do not repeat it, do not make the gap even worse. Of course you could fix the old problem of balancing with a new matchmaking system, that would be a fix, but we would need that in the game first and not on the drawing board or on a desk drawer. Do not screw up the balance (gap) even further, pretty please. Sincerely, Monolillity.
-
APB and Win10 Preview Build OOF Win7 is better
Monolillity replied to TheTankBal's topic in General Discussion Archive
4channel guys you mean 4channel. 4chan is the racist filth spreading boards, the boards did split up a while ago. Only weirdos still talk about 4chan. Oh, right. Sincerely, Monolillity -
Now why would that be? Sincerely, Monolillity
-
Merry Christmas everyone....
Monolillity replied to SunnyMonroe's topic in General Discussion Archive
Enjoy the season people! One toast for APB Sincerely, Monolillity -
APB Holiday Events 2018 (Updated)
Monolillity replied to Lixil's topic in General Discussion Archive
Then teach them how to convert images into APB symbols like every serious symbol creator does. I know it's meant to be on the down low because some people make apb$$$$ with it but yeah. Sincerely, Monolillity -
Oh I bought that slot in the past, totally forgot about that. Hehe. Right, so just get an extra character slot from Armas. I mean, already bought account-bound stuff should appear on the new slots as well right? That's a good option then. True! Nice. ... I'll just keep this new one as an forum account then lol didnt want to buy stuff twice anyway How do I edit posts on this new forum anyway? This does merge but how to edit? Sincerely, Monolillity :)
-
Hello, The 3 character slots limit per account is very unpractical for people trying out the game. E.g. I tried out a female and male criminal first, did customization and some progress, then decided to make a male enforcer, spend some more time on customization and now I cannot even try a female enforcer without having to delete my previous customization's and progress. What I can do however, is create another account and create 3 more characters!?! This is truly highly illogical. I suspect it is done to sell more premium packages, but, make the character slots limit at least 4 per account please? Aka one for each option in the game? Or for all I care, 8 slots. Sincerely, Monolillity Also why do all my posts stay hidden? Are you being invaded by spambots or something?
-
Hello, Thank you. Could you please make it so that we can see the history (i.e. target name, report category and date) of our reports? Additionally it would help tremendously if we could see the most current name of the person we reported in the past (most current alias), suggestion to put their current alias in brackets behind the original name if applicable. Right now it's like sending reports into a black hole, especially with people being able to name-change so easily. Please take this suggestion into consideration as an update for the system. Thank you. Sincerely, Monolillity