MICFILLER

Ahh yes 'a pvp subforum and no pve subforum'. Last I checked pvers typically don't derail threads constantly as pvpers used to. As a co-leader of exile and likely an officer of foe you probably remember how that went on the forum with pvpers correct? Welcome to the point of the pvp forum. It was originally added to these forums to mitigate pvpers derailing with their drama/banter of the time. Just to settle that point quickly. In case you forget...the constant derailing and cleaning of threads due to you guys and wolves. The thing is FE has dungeons and that sort of thing, but you seem to forget something...dungeons were/are against the core organization of FE. Crafting was always meant to be central to FE as was scavenging. So likely it was an organizational conflict more so than the 'we just love pvp so much uwu'. In hindsight and for continued replayability this is an issue and no one really disagrees. The thing is how to approach this while keeping these things in mind...the devs post alpha forgot how this worked and the importance of this and it only hurt the game. So dungeons are good but it would be how to implement them without trying to shove it down peoples throats like dome.

To be fair Nysek's suggestion to sell...move the stack then rebuy what was sold is the best bet for going around it. I've joked it's permanent but it is likely a short term seal to plug the leak so they can do a proper repair, or at least in the meantime mitigate any damage or perceived damage. Although a bandaid for the bandaid would be to disable weight as nysek also suggested(but this would remove the point of the flag bandaid).

Probably referencing the old knowledgebase if I remember right, but that could of been an icarus thing. It's a vague memory though as it was a slightly expanded instruction manual if I remember correctly(aka somewhat useful as a new player but that's all). At the moment I'm just chalking him up to telling tall tales, especially as some of the ideas he has fielded don't address issues and add their own. So likely wishful thinking on his part...also strange considering they are still dealing with the proper functionality of FE before any real changes.

Except those are minor balance issues at the end of the day and can easily be mitigated. DT serum was only a 'rare' commodity when DT was a valuable or needed commodity. And gingerbread is a minor benefit in the first place. I personally can't think of an offseason consume that is truly valuable...gingerbread is the closest and with where speed sits currently it's more of a gimmick. There is also the fact the consume system needs to be revamped in the fist place...it's about 5/6 years out of date. The better argument would be for mats for weps/suits before anything else. Then again the smarter ones would be turning these into suits/weps due to the duplicate tag being removed when doing so(likely at least).

This is good to see. Proper state of where you are with no actual promises and what you have to cleanup to get into a potential position. Hopefully this sort of thing continues.

Yeap because the solution isn't upgrading existing pve weapons or doing dome...nope it's clearly to remove pvp zones. Also the devs up to this point or going forward were just bad at balancing distribution of gain and were too concerned about promoting newer content. At the same time for whatever reason they decided making hybrid equipment a thing(requiring pve and pvp zones to complete), but they forgot that pve players cry incessantly about pvp so it was destined to piss them off(better to keep them entirely split or require pvpers to do pve). On a side note: rothium gain in pve should probably be increased unless that was addressed before. This is prob the only real hard mat for pvers. @OP Another thing would be to revert the 2.4 patches change to dt gain(i believe it was 66% to 33% for f2p). Maybe increase the dt gain bonus from gtc and tc(this would encourage pvp actually). Potentially also make bar buff increase dt gain if it doesn't(can't remember if it does actually). Also if this is still seen as low...consecutive dt matches played/win bonus(played is better really do to the random factor...maybe just a smaller bonus that caps out relatively low).

For basic mob farming it would most likely be fine, but anything past weak mobs it would take forever.

Figured HVR threat alone would put it at a-tier if not s-tier for group vs group. So I don't scrim but why is it banned? Is it the only banned weapon? I get 1on1 or general solo dps it would lose to obir/scout, but it's strength is it's control in the first place not it's 1 man army potential. Also seems odd to put it on the same tier as dmr, which is a niche among niche roles and would seem to almost be a more location counter than a general use/suppression weapon like the hvr.

So I don't have any proper questions directly on FE as they irrelevant until your general view and intent is known. Although I'm curious about LO's understanding of FE and experience with FE. On their personal accounts what is the furthest reached by the staff of LO?(individuals, but if it isn't a 'face' of LO their info isn't needed just say level or so) Were there any particularly noteworthy memories for any of said individuals? What are 3 positive aspects and 3 negative aspects/aspects needing improvement that they noticed while playing? If they had experienced pvp what was their opinion of it?(pvping in general, pvpers they faced etc)

Last I checked multiplayer usually doesn't receive a general rating. So unless they add nudity themselves then it wouldn't have a higher rating. Otherwise anything with an online component would have M rating or the equivalent as a baseline. Cars are limited in general and there has been what like 2/3 new ones since g1 took over where as there has been what 20+ new weapons? With most of these being redundant or garbage because of gimmicky shit. Yeah it's best to plan for it. Still idiotic, but whatever nanny states will nanny.

Looks nice. Also nice to have my forum account unbanned as previous people were lazy.