I made a post exposing a cheater and it got deleted instantly

[Victoria97 16]

Just now, CookiePuss said:

confirmed by whom? 

Confirmed by one employee who left Lil orbit. Certainly not confirmed by you who come and spam the forum with your posts numbers without ever saying anything useful. Wannabe funny 3 letters comeback person. 

You are among first ones who sucked up, while during g1 era u were nothing and still you are nothing with your irrelevant title which is only thing you "accomplished".

I remember you in early days of 2013-2014 and your immature trolling. You were among my first ignored people. 

[CookiePuss 5382]

4 hours ago, Victoria97 said:

Confirmed by one employee who left Lil orbit. Wannabe funny 3 letters comeback person

Who?

 

 

 

Edited November 13 by CookiePuss

[Westford 167]

55 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:

Who?

 

 

 

I think divulging any information that potentially compromises sources and methods should be avoided.

Thank you for your interest.

[CookiePuss 5382]

1 hour ago, Westford said:

I think divulging any information that potentially compromises sources and methods should be avoided.

Thank you for your interest.

I heard from my source that his source made it up. We should make our sources have a baby and see what it says.

 

 

Edited November 13 by CookiePuss

[Victoria97 16]

4 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

Who?

 

 

 

no name and shame bitttsh. I can do 1 liner "conversation" as well. 

[Victoria97 16]

2 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

I heard from my source that his source made it up. We should make our sources have a baby and see what it says.

 

 

snap

Edited November 14 by Victoria97

[CookiePuss 5382]

52 minutes ago, Victoria97 said:

no name and shame bitttsh. I can do 1 liner "conversation" as well. 

you can DM it to me

[Westford 167]

1 hour ago, CookiePuss said:

you can DM it to me

I would advise against it.

But that's me.

[Victoria97 16]

10 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

you can DM it to me

it would still be name & shame. 

Edited November 14 by Victoria97

[Nagletz 219]

14 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

I heard from my source that his source made it up. We should make our sources have a baby and see what it says.

 

 

I'm shipping your sources already and have 2 smut AUs about them. 

[CookiePuss 5382]

9 minutes ago, Nagletz said:

I'm shipping your sources already and have 2 smut AUs about them. 

Nice!

[Anella 73]

118 / 11 / 12 - just a normal day.. expect I have 118 deaths  

[Nanichi 31]

On 11/13/2024 at 6:21 PM, Victoria97 said:

no name and shame bitttsh. I can do 1 liner "conversation" as well. 

Please direct DM me with your source so That I can verify with the team to see how valid it is.

[Darkzero3802 613]

On 11/12/2024 at 8:35 PM, Nanichi said:

GM's are not C.S. we in no way are apart of the ban process. We record evicence and make reports.

GM's are not technically supposed to chase cheaters since we have a anti-cheat and C.S. who handles this issue. We do record and report what we see on our own but in the end C.S. and Sard will handle the cheating issue.

So you guys have all of your eggs in one basket with the bottom cut out of it. Cheaters make up the majority of the in game population and evidence points to them getting past SARD. Your system works so well that cheaters stream APB on twitch and show their cheats and dont get banned. You will never curtail the cheating epidemic in this game so long as this light footed system remains in place.

[MonkaS 215]

On 10/31/2024 at 12:14 PM, Haganu said:

If we've learnt anything from ffbans.org, it would be name and praise.

nah anyone who ever thought that is missing there frontal lobe. closets hated being exposed and rage cheaters never cared. look at film no one cared after his 3~ ban. LO most likely chooses not to announce names because of either some CA law or because they are afraid of a civil suit since they seem to run very lean as a company and prob can't afford paying for every potential frivolous law suit even tho I'm pretty sure CA has good anti-slapp laws.