UubeNubeh DaWog
-
Content Count
2260 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by UubeNubeh DaWog
-
-
2 hours ago, 23k said:You're the one using the strawmen arguments. Spawn system, hit reg, problems the whole hit box is a joke, matcmaking problems, driving problems. server problems. the pay 2 win stigma problems you never even acknowledged those problems, You never actually had any valid arguments against headshots either look at this.
You fix the hit reg and the hit box then you implement the headshots. picking a character that is tiny, or tall characters complaining that they're at a disadvantage is bunch of bs. Its comes down to skill the height and weight of the character is not that drastic if you could create little paper thin midgets then you would have more of a solid point. The players will adapt to the enemies hell they wont even feel the change.
Everyone has already acknowledged these problems a long time ago, however they have no bearing on the argument you're not trying to make. Even most of the stigma's the game has acquired are only due to public ignorance, people who don't even look into what they think is a problem.
You havent made any valid arguments for headshots. Its been a constant Red Herring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrelevant_conclusion) . With not even relevant examples between how "headshots" and "no headshots" will be different (or the same) other than vague explanations of how gameplay will improve just because things have changed.
Saying "everything doesnt matter, things will just feel better" is not a valid argument.
Please stop the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
Thanks
13 Pages! We did it.
@CookiePuss -
Spawns, matchmaking and gun balance are not the core of the game, they need a rework but they arent a massive undertaking individually because of that. The game wont change that drastically when reworking those, they require specific tuning because it only takes small issues for them to get out of hand.3 hours ago, 23k said:APB will require large amounts of development time due to nearly every system in apb needing changes regardless of headshots. You sing the same ol song. Headshots wont slow the game down. The game pace is dictated by the players. Even now without headshots, the game sometimes goes fast and sometimes it goes slow, it depends on what players you play against. Again what makes APB stay APB is the customization adding headshots to APB wont make it a subpar csgo knockoff, your argument is so invalid... Then you could say Battlefield is just a subpar knockoff of Call of Duty just with bigger maps...
But we're getting off topic all over the place, the topic is headshots. Hit reg issues has nothing to do with headshots either way. Everyone has been taking the argument seriously, assuming their are no other factors (such as hit reg issues) that affect what you're arguing.
You point out missions go fast and missions go slow, can you point out why that is? There are reasons to why missions can speed up or slow down.
And you point out adding headshots to apb wouldnt make it a subpar csgo knockoff, why?
Even in your last response to me, there was no clear answer to the questions i asked. How would adding headshots benefit players and give players chances to make new plays?
Again, we're assuming the game works 100% perfectly. Give us examples.
Im not sure if you know, but you know that cars driving the way they do is because they're server sided? Ever seen cars in GTA lag out? Basically cars being server side stops that issue, well its supposed to but the servers haven't exactly been running well for a long time as it is. Anyway besides that, last time i checked they couldn't go faster because it would cause issues which i think? can be fixed with the engine upgrade.
Also, linking those comments of people who disliked the game doesnt really prove anything, a few people who have a negative opinion of the game doesnt translate into "everyone", especially when most dont understand latency or not understanding how many times they are actually being hit. ( Being hit by a PMG and killed in 3 shots has never happened)
Im pretty sure this is the game you want, based on all the little bits of gameplay information.
Ive never seen a game where "covering fire" and "leap frogging" has actually worked outside of a "E3 Gameplay trailer".
I dont really want this, most people here wouldnt want it either im pretty sure. -
The Burden of proof is on you my dude.9 hours ago, 23k said:You got no real counter arguments. I all i did was post solid solutions to fix majority of the games problems.
You're coming at everyone with an idea that is contrary to the status quo.
You're argument is just not convincing enough. -
Sum of the whole thread from the first post.21 minutes ago, Kempington said:@23k
I don't feel like you've thought this suggestion through enough and weighed up all the problems this would cause.
I didn't want the thread to end so fast. Oh well.
Even if you changed bullet mechanics from hitscan to physical objects to help with kill times, after everything else it would just become another fps clone. -
Move fast where? Not towards an objective.5 minutes ago, 23k said:
You can still move fast and be smart about it, nades wont allow you to corner camp for long.14 minutes ago, UubeNubeh DaWog said:Smarter = Slower?
Why move fast when you die in 1-3 bullets? Cant aim while running.
Nades dont allow you to camp now??
Definitely not the first. Look at all those no longer posting,4 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:How am I the first one to realize we are being trolled?
-
Yes less full auto snipers would be nice.
-
1
-
-
Smarter = Slower?1 minute ago, 23k said: it will make you more cautious of your surroundings and make you think instead of rushing in. = Smarter gameplay
APB has alot faster pace different game mechanics, faster movements. = What about after the changes? movements are still going to be faster in APB regardless.
Why move fast when you die in 1-3 bullets? Cant aim while running. -
All it was, was a simple delay between running and shooting. That got removed and the iceskating began.1 minute ago, CookiePuss said:
Makes it a little harder to aim, which is nice imo.2 minutes ago, Dopefish said:The only reason why crosshair is disabled while sprinting is to indicate that you're unable to shoot, but since G1 added sprintshooting this makes no sense anymore.
-
22 minutes ago, 23k said:The fact of the matter is having headshots in APB wont break the game it will make you more cautious of your surroundings and make you think instead of rushing in. = Slower gameplay?
Don't compare PUBG and Arma to APB it has different combat APB has alot faster pace different game mechanics, faster movements. = What about after the changes? -
People.8 hours ago, YeOldLegends said:
Lmao. Sir are you smart. Blizzard didn't catch them. Nore did Rito. Its as if your talking just to talk. and again it was not for a MONTH straight. That was a 1-day DDoS. This is my last reply to you because I feel like your a troll. Goodbye13 hours ago, UubeNubeh DaWog said:Yeah and they got busted because people were looking for them because riot games, blizzard and co have much more sophisticated systems to protect and monitor their networks.
Did it stop them from doing it though? No.
So whats to stop someone ddosing APB? LO isnt Blizzard/Sony/Riot and unless they are actually looking for the people ddosing anyone could ddos the game at any time without a care.
Blizzard and Co (Not just Blizzard Riot and PSN)
"Never have I ever heard of a DOS that persists for a month" =/= Never happens. (See; appeal to ignorance)
https://archive.li/KUlZy
The things you find on the internet. -
Yeah and they got busted because people were looking for them because riot games, blizzard and co have much more sophisticated systems to protect and monitor their networks.6 minutes ago, YeOldLegends said:um, bud. That was lizard squad. Half the people from lizard squad got busted. Lizzard squad is no longer a group. See my point. There are just a bunch of copycats now of lizard squad. also that DDoS attack lasted for a day or two or 3, not a "month" I actually remember those attacks. I used to play league back then.
Did it stop them from doing it though? No.
So whats to stop someone ddosing APB? LO isnt Blizzard/Sony/Riot and unless they are actually looking for the people ddosing anyone could ddos the game at any time without a care. -
Dangerous Liability and unethical actions never stopped the people who ddosed blizzard, psn AND riot games at once.15 hours ago, YeOldLegends said:
Yea. That is true. But there is no way that they are getting DOS'ed on the daily. One that's dangerous and a liability for the people running the DOS. Two that's unethical and a load of shit. Never have I ever heard of a DOS that persists for a month. A heap of shit that's what that is.15 hours ago, CookiePuss said:Theyve already said its the network code.
Doesnt mean they cant also get ddos'd.
If a small game like APB getting ddos's regularly is unfathomable, dunno what to say, too much faith in humanity i guess.
https://dotesports.com/the-op/news/psn-blizzard-riot-ddos-attack-615
https://www.hackread.com/blizzard-entertainment-hit-by-massive-ddos-attack/
-
6 hours ago, BXNNXD said:[citation needed]
-
Neeed mooaarr
-
Skay cheating, Orod cheating, QU33N1E, cheating. It could be any one of us!Just now, Similarities said:
uube cheating, me cheating, who is next? could it be cookie, or zombie? it's time to SPIN THE WHEEL.37 minutes ago, Excalibur! said:When you closet cheat and claim people harass cheaters when we complain just to keep us quiet and you can keep on your stuff wont make it better for anyone.
Its thanks to complains that they are improving anticheats as best as they can (i hope).-
1
-
-
When your hatred turns into the harassment of every player you "believe" is cheating, you are literally accomplishing nothing and making things worse for everyone else.15 minutes ago, Excalibur! said:Yeah you are right. Cheaters actually play the game and enjoy it, make rmt business... they give a good use of the game. While we just complain all the time about them instead of enjoying the game. How cancerous we are!!!
Who am i to hate on them?
PS. Feel free to PM me any proof anytime
-
1
-
-
Who started spamming the twitch stream? Non cheaters6 minutes ago, Excalibur! said:I hope now Matt understands the damage that cheaters create and keep creating even with their trash presence.
Who created the thread initially? A non cheater
Who blew up the issues? Non cheaters
Why are we changing things now? Because of non cheaters.
What did the person (who was as far as anyone knows) wasn't currently cheating do? Play the game.
Yeah cheaters are damaging the game.-
4
-
3
-
-
1: Because there are requirements to being a GM. Not to play the game.7 minutes ago, Poperon said:
I get that Streaming and Choosing a GM are different situations, but as an staff member, both should have the same weight.
Answer: If i'm not mistaken, it has been said by iDisney. Lixil should avoid playing with random players out of nowhere. Staff should only play with players who have won some kind of event, where one of the rewards would be being added to a party with the Staff members. That would avoid part of the drama, but it isn't 100% sure because APB community strongly tends to overreact and create cancerous whiny posts, free toxicity, etc...
I highly recommend that Lixil should never stop streaming her gameplays like Tiggs did, that was a big mistake letting the community get thru her nerves.
Do solo gameplays, be kind to players, harsh to the ones who deserve it, do events and stuff and that's it. Any further interaction = chances of getting toxicity from "malicious" players who want to link you to Tiggs as a CM, and ruin your life.
2: An ex banned player could win an event. It would also still exclude a large portion of the player base who have no ability to win events to play with the CM.
3: You cant please everyone so pleasing the loud minority is just going to make things stale because we cant have anything nice thanks to people who feel the need to be 100% emotionally involved.-
1
-
-
Very small. The only real issue is that a person with past ban history got to play with the CM.2 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:yer a small problem
... gottem
Because people believe that once you've broken the rules you get no second chances and have no rights at an opportunity to be like another player ever again. Wow the human race is so great. /s
-
5
-
2
-
-
People overreacted for small problems. Sad its taken a turn away from player interaction.
-
7
-
-
7 hours ago, a Pair of Socks said:Just a reminder that this is how you can run around in apb xd
I mean, just a reminder.
17 hours ago, Lixil said:These forums are PG13.
Game is 17+.
-
On 7/3/2018 at 11:02 PM, CookiePuss said:I normally wouldn't put someone on blast, but it seems far too many people have far too much faith in Fairfight as used by old G1... so I'm just gonna leave this here.
Except mattscott knew exactly what to do to trigger a ban.
Even if it was that easy to stumble into why werent there more people banned? Also if it was that easy you could just change the parameter settings to make it harder to stumble across.
And then if if it was that easy to know the problem why was it so hard to give back peoples items or verify bans?
-
1
-
-
So this is why the previous forums were so visually dull.
-
2 hours ago, Salvick said:I mean that I like to imagine a riot in San Paro besides the game mode, or a gang fight like in the pics, something more cinematic I had in my head, lol.
But I liked Anarchy districts, these also ended up empty, right?
Empty or only 1/20 of the map was being used. Only closest spawn points between enf and crim.
1 hour ago, Ignas / qsn said:Thank you for pointing it out, but is the new game mode related to Fight Club? Because Asylum was the place to level up roles and baylan was to earn some quick cash.
I hope Riot can be something inbetween atleast
Pretty sure cash works the same way in either fight club, if you get more kills you get more money.
There was a short time where FC in general payed out significantly but that was a bug and fixed quickly.
What does 3-Point sling actually do?
in General Discussion Archive
Posted · Edited by UubeNubeh DaWog
Placebo.
Equip time only refers to the time it takes to switch between the weapons you're holding.
3 point sling only reduces the time it takes to switch from your secondary to primary.