BlueB 35 Posted July 9, 2019 Quick someone qualify op with sad emoticon so we have them all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neophobia 216 Posted July 10, 2019 (edited) 20 hours ago, Zian said: According to that post. Your video is simply going to be filed and put into a "collection pile" against the person you're accusing is hacking. So a ban could take as long as they feel necessary. Which also means, it could never actually happen despite being shown evidence that contradicts their decision. it could take as long as they see fit but this obviously just means that they want sufficient evidence and dont just ban anyone on a whim. if the first piece of evidence is sufficient (and a vid of a blatant speedhacker certainly would be), they'll get banned. easy as that Edited July 10, 2019 by neophobia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExpectoPatronum 22 Posted July 10, 2019 3 minutes ago, neophobia said: it could take as long as they see fit but this obviously just means that they want sufficient evidence and dont just ban anyone on a whim. if the first piece of evidence is sufficient (and a vid of a blatant speedhacker certainly would be), they'll get banned. easy as that Technically you could still fake that. So yeah, it's really up to them what they want to do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zian 68 Posted July 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, ExpectoPatronum said: Technically you could still fake that. So yeah, it's really up to them what they want to do. ^ This is the logic they are using to justify doing nothing. And you're right, technically that could be faked evidence. But you know what wouldn't be faked? An active GM seeing it with their own eyes, and then issuing a temporary 24 hour ban until that player is sufficiently investigated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExpectoPatronum 22 Posted July 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Zian said: ^ This is the logic they are using to justify doing nothing. And you're right, technically that could be faked evidence. But you know what wouldn't be faked? An active GM seeing it with their own eyes, and then issuing a temporary 24 hour ban until that player is sufficiently investigated. 100% right buddy but the gm couldn't host an event to act like a cheater at the same time, so there's that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zian 68 Posted July 10, 2019 Just now, ExpectoPatronum said: 100% right buddy but the gm couldn't host an event to act like a cheater at the same time, so there's that Technically those events could be good starting points at getting a census on how many cheaters are actually closeted in this game... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fortune Runner 796 Posted July 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Zian said: ^ This is the logic they are using to justify doing nothing. And you're right, technically that could be faked evidence. But you know what wouldn't be faked? An active GM seeing it with their own eyes, and then issuing a temporary 24 hour ban until that player is sufficiently investigated. *Little Orbit adds new anti cheat because old one stopped working from bypass* Zian " They do nothing and neglect us!!!* ...... after Little Orbit adds a new anti cheat.... *facepalm* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
