YakuzaStyle

Trying to "expand your brand", when your game can't even run properly. Then selling out/selling your brand away for some temporary cash. One bad decision after another. Dumb, dumb, and dumber...

Common sense. If that player was good at all to begin with, they wouldn't have downloaded them in the first place. Cheating isn't a choice, it's a mentality, one of a person who can't beat others without getting an advantage, and at the same time can't take losing. When a cheater gets banned, he only learns how to avoid getting caught, and doesn't learn how to stop cheating. He just figures out ways to not be so blatant, that way he can't be detected as easily. That's why I said that they don't stop and only turn down their settings. Some cheaters will adjust their cheat to play above average, so they aren't as blatant to the human eye. While some cheaters will play mediocre against you the whole game, then cheat "in the clutch" because they know if they don't, they'll lose, which is easy to spot. Just because a cheater says he's not cheating, doesn't mean he isn't. Fact is, he could be cheating only when he needs to to look "legit". Unfortunately, there's a lot of dumb people out there who take the word of an "ex-cheater" over people who've been playing games clean for years. Cheaters are in denial and will never admit to it unless they feel some sort of guilt over cheating. Like I said, cheating is a mentality, nothing stops a cheater from deleting the files, but nothing stops a cheater from downloading them again either. Cheaters lose the benefit of the doubt when they got banned/got caught cheating. I've seen from many games in my experience of playing shooters people who were known cheaters, but want to act like they changed, and they really don't actually change to begin with. It's just them trying to say "I'm a pro, you just suck" without actually doing anything of value. Even if one cheater "changes his ways", that doesn't represent the other 99% of cheaters, and there's a guarantee he might go back to cheats if he can't deal with losing and not getting better. So that's my source. Common sense and previous experience.

Source of what?

So you can't reply with anything constructive to counter my post, so now I'm fake. Makes perfect sense.

A Battle Royale game won't stop people from having to deal with poor gameplay, server lag, and hit registry problems. It's just capitalizing on the Fortnite/P.U.'s Battlegrounds craze, and in reality isn't anything creative or original. It'll be just another "thing to do", until everyone gets bored of it or they realize that they still have to put up with the same flawed gameplay and multiple server issues. If I wanted to play Battle Royale, I would just go to the previous games instead, because they aren't as buggy and have more players. Worrying about a repetitive game mode that literally everyone has played instead of fixing an already broken game is a terrible idea, and is a sign of the developers caring more about short-term success than long-term.

Your question doesn't make any sense. Just because he turns off his cheats for 4 minutes doesn't mean that person isn't a cheater anymore. There's a guarantee he'll just turn it on again when he's losing. That's what togglers do.

Cheaters never stop cheating, they only turn down their settings.

Yes, they should. The problem with gunfights in this game are the people that you drop their health to less than 10%, getting into their Steel Plated III-modded Pioneers, knowing that they can get invincibility frames a while after they open the vehicle door, and realize even if you empty a full clip into their Pioneer, they just get to wait until their health regenerates at no risk. This is just exploiting the game mechanics, and it allows bad players to survive fights that they normally wouldn't in any other game. I'm talking about 1v1 fights, if it was me and 2 other guys against that guy hiding in his car, it wouldn't be much of a problem. Getting into a car isn't a talent, you just press one button and you're safe. They can also keep switching cars whenever it's smoking this way without any risk of dying unless you use a Volcano or grenade launcher (Concussion Grenades don't count because it's a hit or miss many times, you might not even get a chance to finish cooking the grenade because the guy jumps out of the car, meaning you need to switch weapons fast). In my opinion it shows poor mechanics, because you can't damage someone in a car without an OSMAW, shooting a car only gets you killed since like I said, the car driver can just get out and kill you since they don't risk anything. And no, not everybody can or has the money to get an OSMAW, "Maybe learn to aim better!" Hitting 5 out of 6 shots, and missing the last shot because of invincibility frames because the enemy is getting in the car is "aiming better", and like I said before, this exploit allows bad players to survive and still get kills in this game. Bad players can already win games out of luck in APB: Reloaded, we shouldn't be making it easier for them. There should be no such thing as "safe" in a shooter game, this is especially true if you're in a vehicle. There should always be risks. If you're on the battlefield, I'm going to kill you. That's all. This game's going to need a lot of refining and changes to many the mechanics in order for the game to improve, it can't survive being the same game from Gamersfirst. If the game was so good, it wouldn't have such a low player base as it does now. It's like expecting broken bones to get better without proper treatment. Changes are going to need to be made. You can make some interesting and good, well-thought out mechanics without ruining vehicles, that is if you have the right minds behind the designs.They just need to have proper guidance and some testing. Just my two cents.

All the community will tell you no, unless it's they're favourite gun getting nerfed. Hypocrites. As for the Yukon, they could lower the TTK a bit. Other than a "glitch", the only people that hated the Yukon were the complaining noobs that would stand behind corners looking for easy kills. That was why this gun was so good. against corner campers, it gave corner campers depression. But even then, anybody who actually used the Yukon knows that it wasn't a sure kill, and it had it's weaknesses. It's also funny that people are okay with the Yukon getting "nerfed", but it's a problem when it's the True Ogre (True Button Holder), a gun which takes zero skill to use (just hold the button down, and yes, I actually owned the Ogre. Easy kills.). Nice double standards. For the people saying "But it has a wind-up!!", anybody with atleast 30 IQ knows to prewind during combat. The rewind means nothing.

APB community still defending closets I see. Acting like this is a new game on the market since Little Orbit came along. Stop lying to yourselves to feel better about the game. Just accept reality and come up with a solution.

It's same for me. The trade lock is supposed to be for the trading system. Instead, it blocks me from the Marketplace, mailing system, and trading. which is bad. So now I'm stuck with the starter vehicle and I also can't buy any high level mods. I get the same generic claptrap saying "use a computer you've used in the past to remove the lock", which is funny because I've been using the same computer to play this game since 2016, so what do you say now? What's sad is that there are people actually defending this, it's terrible and this is only here to baby the players with kid gloves. They just added a good update with a stupid one. It's the player's responsibility to be responsible for their accounts, not the company or their game. If you need a trade lock to not get scammed, then you shouldn't be playing online games to begin with.

Also some of you guys are pathetic. You act like somehow a game that's been known to have lots of cheaters in it, is now without/with few cheaters, even though 100% guaranteed after the unbanning there are cheaters that got their accounts back. While at the same time defending closet cheaters, and making fun of people who complain about them. Then again, the forums here are filled with immature 12 year olds, and insecure trolls, so you can't be really all that surprised. right?

BattleEye supporters before Battle Eye: "If we switch to BattleEye there won't be anymore cheaters!" BattleEye supporters after BattleEye integration, seeing complaints closet cheaters and triggerbotters: "There will always be cheaters in the game."

It's funny that you guys don't want to remove the red crosshair for cheaters, yet people agree with having the Random Number Generator/RNG recoil (also known as "win by luck") for cheaters. Double standards.