Tigrix
-
Content Count
850 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Tigrix
-
-
4 hours ago, Flaws said:https://i.gyazo.com/b74a68dcee1fb56770829e799595fd81.mp4
https://i.gyazo.com/9a397dce39b4a31a2a655f1119f4b1b9.mp4
https://i.gyazo.com/0388123c9d751b9ffaab1c0dba3a8708.mp4
https://i.gyazo.com/9792147b245e14319bf58e1fe3e0e6d0.mp4
https://i.gyazo.com/ce34416c3cf5001b91edc37e4495a0e6.mp4
Okay, let's call it mid-range (40-50m) instead. As you can see it can full auto easily at 40-50m. That doesn't mean that it will beat any of the other ARs at that range, it means that it's capable of dealing considerable damage with little effort and as seen in the clips, it's extremely efficent as a support weapon due to it's 50m base range (+ IR3 which most people use on it, 57m) and it's relatively tight max bloom which allows for a more consistent than not RNG. It won't work 10/10 times at these ranges but neither does the PMG and that needs a range nerf as well.
I'm sure cover solves all weapon balancing issues.
Do other weapons in APB get balanced around being "not as good as any other weapon of their class, but really good supports!" ?
I mean..... what? do guns get balanced around being decent at farming.... assists?
Weren't you saying the NTEC is the most balanced gun in APB? I don't think you'd ever lose a fight vs atac at your 40-50m range examples.
So if the ATAC is better at close-up, isn't that exactly what it's supposed to be or do you just want it to suck everywhere?
-
3 hours ago, MattScott said:Hi all,
Let me step in here to provide some clarity.
First, I want to say that I respect the OP’s opinion. I’m going to disagree in my answer, but I can appreciate the dialog this has raised on this thread.
Next, I think it is important to remember that the game itself is rated M and has pre-existing references to prostitution and the term itself. I’m not going to start diluting RTW’s vision for a gritty world with mature themes.
As has already been pointed out, the term refers to a male or female, and more importantly the title was meant to be more of a joke than anything since it refers to candy on Easter rather than prostitution. This is a case where I do think the OP is taking this a bit too seriously. Having said that, if you don’t approve of the term, you have agency on whether to apply the title to yourself or not.
Lastly, the forums are PG-13, and have always had different rules than the game. Previous management felt the need to blacklist the term here, which I’ll respect for the time being.
Thanks,
Matt
Idk how there is the (on this forum) sudden wide conception that the word wh0re refers equally to men as to women, that imo seems a bit far fetched and in poor taste pretending it being so.
I'm pretty sure, outside of this forum asking a 1000 random people what the word wh0re refers to, 99% would have answers that was very much gender specific, as the definitions too.
In all the big dictionaries it firstly, aka line 1: refers to women of "ill morals".
Thanks for having the stones to come out and make an official reply though (most game developers would avoid it), it's appreciated even if we clearly have a different opinion on inappropriate jokes.
I absolutely love the gritty nature of APB, but to me there's a difference between story gameplay, npc-contact personalities/talk and then the studio adding in player titles of such phrases that they refer them as jokes. On-top of that, from a business standpoint, mature rating and all taken into consideration, I really don't see any upsides of adding such "agency choice" to players - not just for the false impression it can give some players about the usage of that word being totally fine cus' "you're in APB", but also to anyone promoting your game (including yourselves if you'll ever start doing it). Anyone just seeing clips from the game on YT or a screenshot, don't know your sense of humor or that it's "all just an easter joke".
If I was playing Battlefield Vietnam and shooting viet congs and getting gritty responses from quest NPC's and blowing up tents with c4 ... yes, it's all part of the game, the story, the theme of the game. However if the developers of BF Vietnam tomorrow adds an easter event and give out players titles of crooked eyes killer whatever....
Again, I think there is (and should remain?) a clear difference in smack-talk from gameplay lore/story/npc characters and then giving the agency of such choice to your players as a joke.
That being said, I'll simply end it on the note that I am very surprised, thanks for the reply. -
ATAC is at best "decent" at mid range, but mostly it's wildly inaccurate at anything past 25 meters.
It's hardly a cheese weapon as I barely see anyone using it and those who are, usually just try it out and switch back to their "real" primary.
I guess the influx of JT has given a lot more people the option to try the ATAC, which is a good thing imo.
It's definitely not overpowered, at best it's underwhelming when up against the meta guns.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, MartinPL said:Firstly,
If you have to nitpick for a specific definition of a word to make your point, it probably isn't too sound of a point.
Secondly, it's a description of what?
Dictionary definitions explain the word's meaning, not how offensive it is. I asked you several times to explain what about the word made it worse than — for example — jokes about sodomy (Gumball's lines), implications of incest (the word "motherfvcker") or dehumanization (the word "fuzzy bunny"). I asked about the pragmatics of this word being worse than its alternatives. You were unable to provide me with such explanation for several posts in a row.
Thirdly: no, you didn't answer it. Had you answered the question, I would not have written those previous posts. Hell, I wouldn't have written this post.
I've rephrased and dumbed down the question several times in order to make it easier for you to understand it and answer it — I cannot possibly simplify it any further and yet you still cannot provide me with an answer. You missed your chance, bud. I'm out. Write this one down as a "win" in your little notebook or something if it makes you feel better. I don't have the energy to keep hoping that you'll answer simple questions anymore.
Did you miss the part where it said vulgar and sexually explicit language?
Seems you're good at doing exactly what you accuse others of:) Selectively nit-picking!
I did answer you, go back and read the replies please.
I said again; you're using examples of a curse word "fuck", while the topic revolves around NOT a curse word, but a derogatory insult.
Widely understood to be an insult and widely understood to be specifically an insult towards women selling themselves for $$.
The fact that you still refuse to acknowledge the difference of a curse word "fuck" and this... is just baffling at this point.
Have fun being "out" of the debate, lets see how long
-
Just now, MartinPL said:I don't think you understand the question posed to you. Either that or you are knowingly dancing around the act of answering it for reasons I am not aware of.
I cannot simplify this any further, so please do actually answer me this time around. This is the last time I'm asking for an explanation and I'm not going to participate in this any further if I don't get a concise answer from you this time around.
What exactly makes the use of that specific word so much worse than the use of any other curse word?
Firstly, its not a curse word. Fuck is a curse word or used-as a curse word.
Wh0re is a description of **** do i need to link you again 3 different English dictionaries?
Ok then, I hope it clears it up again for you, finally maybe this time?
I told you this, like 7 posts back btw, goto page 1 and 2 and read my reply concerning your example of "fuck" and "gumball talking of sodomi".
yw:)-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, MartinPL said:As @Solamente pointed out, anyone labelling themselves with that word probably doesn't have a single issue with it. Your point is...?
I don't understand where you're getting the impression that I'm doing this for internet points. It's either you projecting onto others (again) or you repeating falsehoods (again) hoping that they will eventually become real when repeated enough times.
All of these questions are related to the big question that you refuse to answer. I thought that I posed it in a simple enough manner, but I suppose I'll have to rephrase it again since you're so insistent on deflecting the argument instead of answering it: out of all possible insults, what makes that single specific word so bad compared to its alternatives?
(This also goes for @MACKxBOLAN) I can only refer you to actually read my response. The difference of in-game story from an M-rated game with contacts aka NPC's talking about each-other --- versus --- a company making jokes of very derogatory words that they already struggle with warning their community against using towards each-other.
I explained it now a couple of times the difference:) I really can't help you make it any clearer.
I do however think that a reasonable person can see the difference in whats gameplay/story and npcs talking and we'll see if Matt is/was aware of this title at all being added/released. -
26 minutes ago, MartinPL said:Alright, at this point you're just projecting ',:|
Honestly, reading your posts feels like regardless of what you're told by other people, you're just repeating the same thing over and over, worded slightly differently.
You still haven't addressed the question from earlier: what makes that single specific word so bad, compared to other things? You can't say that "we already discussed the mature content of APB" and think that'll let you move on without addressing the questions posed to you. You've outright refused to specify what's so evil about this specific word compared to the others.
"Fuck" is okay with you. You don't seem to mind the word "b!tch". You don't have a gripe with Gumball joking about sodomy. What makes the word "wh0re" such an unspeakable offense? Is it that the term is "gendered" (which it, by definition, isn't)? In that case, why do you not have any qualms towards the word "b!tch"?
You're presenting an argument that the word should not be in the game because it is "very derogatory" — but 1) there are already other derogatory terms and expressions in the game, some of which are arguably worse; 2) you refuse to explain what exactly makes it so unforgivable, instead resorting to repeating that "it's bad" and never elaborating why.
You're supposing that the title goes against the Terms of Service — but 1) as you've been repeatedly proven, it isn't; 2) you do not decide what is in breach of it and what isn't.
You are arguing in bad faith. You don't want a debate, you want your opinion to be enforced as law.
Is this your first time participating in an online discussion? Did you expect everyone to absentmindedly fall in line and agree with everything you're saying? Or that if you just repeat the same thing enough times with slightly altered wording or insult people enough times, you'll automatically win?
You don't understand the difference between derogatory words as wh0re and saying fuck off? What does sodomi discussing have to do with anything? You can discuss racism too, that doesn't have anything to do with the point of this topic? You're trying too hard to farm points among your buddies dude
I explained precisely upper what's the difference and why I find that using such language as reward titles is going against everything they're trying to establish via their EULA update and in-game active GMs/moderation policy. Do you need me to copy paste it again? here you go, specially for you:
Firstly, since LO took over APB, they've inherited the game "as-is", by all definitions and standards, that's the outcome of taking over an active project.
All the mature stuff that is in APB, is taken as-is and personally as I already made clear with my reply to Kyoki, there's IMHO nothing wrong in tough language, aka "fuck" or "suck" or w/e examples.
That's APB, that's the mature rating. I don't see anything derogatory insulting in the word "fuck".
Anyway, LO inherited APB as-is and right away made a very clear point of wanting to ASAP update the eula to their "own standards" (if you dig among the first posts of LO, this was the primary first topics).
All good so far yes? Aka, they've shown responsibility imo so far. They take a pride in the work they do and they understand that they're the ones in charge and being looked up to in a certain way for "whats okay and whats not okay". They made a big point of wanting to re-establish in-game moderation (active GM's partaking in chat and actually warning/moderating for TOS violations).
All good so far yes?
Ok, so LO imo so far has made good strides to try and turn this community around to a more positive and shall we say... functional one.
I'm not saying they've done any miracles or anything, ofc not ... but they've definitely improved the community IMO, since they took over. (Yes LO, this is a compliment, i'm not just bashing you guys).
In fact, my post about this specific derogatory word being randomly tossed into the game as a reward title, should show how much I've come to respect LO for their stances and their attempts at bettering the community via rules and moderation/GM's etc etc. It's IMO disappointing that they in this way joke with their own TOS, because it sends the wrong signal to people who look for excuses and greenlights to insult others with this type of derogatory language.
I think Matt understands that and I really doubt he had a hand in this or was aware of it going out. I guess we will wait and see.
Merged.
21 minutes ago, Solamente said:that seems like a pretty dangerous allowance, literally anything could be construed as acceptable as long as it was ingame before little orbit took over?
and how does that relate to user generated content - what if i had a symbol that's against little orbit's ToS, would it be okay because i made it in 2016?
im not sure who brought up 'fuck' but my examples specifically were illegal (in many US states at least) acts and other derogatory (comparable to 'wh*re') words used to refer to women, none of which seemed to have bothered you even now after they've been pointed out
this seems like a flimsy excuse to me, anyone using the title and being called a wh*re likely doesn't care because they are already labeling themselves as such
anyone calling someone without the title a wh*re gets a warning or whatever the appropriate disciplinary action is and the line is drawn
at worst we get another thread like this one where someone doesn't understand the difference between the two scenarios and it gets explained to them
Ah cmon mate, you understand that it'd be a mess to have such ambivalent rules lol.
"Dude, i wanna report this pleasant fellow for violating the TOS, calling me sexual swear words as wh0re!"
"oh shit ok, we will deal with it.... oh no wait, did you actually use the title we added in the game calling urself wh0re?"
lol cmon.
You are able to discuss this at a mature level, so I believe you are also able to understand why a game company should follow it's own policy and why you don't make exceptions where you have to explain "well the user actually in THIS specific case picked themselves the title of wh0re, so it's completely fine they were called as such..."
Again, we'll see. I obviously don't believe that Matt was aware of this going out, but we will see and if i'm wrong then i'll be very surprised while wrong. -
3 minutes ago, isu said:I can understand what tigrix is feeling regarding the degradation of women i feel its actually a worthy argument for this discussion
They should have added a "gigantic clit" title instead
i hope little orbit will do the right thing and possibly change the title
thx for reading
1 post, joined forum today.
Jeesh, I appreciate your effort m8, now log back on your main
-
13 minutes ago, MartinPL said:I'm afraid you are not the authority in deciding who understood your post and who didn't.
Last time I checked, the word "fuck" was pretty derogatory. So was "b!tch". So was "motherfvcker". So was sodomizing animals. The first one is used several times in the game, the middle two are dispatch briefings (APB Reloaded\APBGame\Localization\INT\Subtitles_FEM.int), the last one is a quote from Gumball. I ask again: exactly why are you singling out that specific word as especially offensive?
You omitted point 9.4.3., which explicitly states that determining whether something breaches this is left to "Little Orbit's absolute discretion". They have the final say in whether something is defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, harmful, harassing, hateful, invasive of another's privacy, sexually explicit, offensive, or denigrating to another person's reputation or social standing. You should know that if you agreed to the Terms of Service.
Lying by omission to prove your point is not the way to go.
I feel like you're reading into this title a bit too much and trying to present it as more malicious than it really is or could be, presumably in a bout of self-righteousness or in pursuit of those sweet, sweet internet karma points.
I am when using the context of IMO, unless you don't know what IMO is an abbreviation of.
We already discussed the mature content of APB, what did you miss? go back and read the reply.
Oh, but again - I've been saying THE WHOLE TIME that this is the determination of LO. They set the boundaries - it's THEIR eula we follow, hence they should be the shining example of it.
See? This really proves how badly you miss-read my original post. My entire topic was about LO crossing the boundary when using such a term as a reward title in their game.
LO should be an example of their own TOS, i've literally said it since the start of this thread, how did you manage to still miss it by now MartinPL? maybe your underlying passive-aggressive hunt for those sweet sweet acceptance points among your fellow buddies is clouding your ability to read objectively what's being replied to you.
Luckily I do think that LO has more reason and rationale than the infamous segment of the community that frequents this forum the most.9 minutes ago, Solamente said:putting aside that the ToS is very specific about user generated content, i would reuse your own words - how deep does that rabbit hole go then?
should little orbit remove the potentially offensive content that i listed in my previous post? should less derogatory titles like 'scrub' or 'noob' be removed as well? should certain clothing items be removed for being obscene? do the voiceovers need to be censored?
Ok, i'll go along with that.
Firstly, since LO took over APB, they've inherited the game "as-is", by all definitions and standards, that's the outcome of taking over an active project.
All the mature stuff that is in APB, is taken as-is and personally as I already made clear with my reply to Kyoki, there's IMHO nothing wrong in tough language, aka "fuck" or "suck" or w/e examples.
That's APB, that's the mature rating. I don't see anything derogatory insulting in the word "fuck".
Anyway, LO inherited APB as-is and right away made a very clear point of wanting to ASAP update the eula to their "own standards" (if you dig among the first posts of LO, this was the primary first topics).
All good so far yes? Aka, they've shown responsibility imo so far. They take a pride in the work they do and they understand that they're the ones in charge and being looked up to in a certain way for "whats okay and whats not okay". They made a big point of wanting to re-establish in-game moderation (active GM's partaking in chat and actually warning/moderating for TOS violations).
All good so far yes?
Ok, so LO imo so far has made good strides to try and turn this community around to a more positive and shall we say... functional one.
I'm not saying they've done any miracles or anything, ofc not ... but they've definitely improved the community IMO, since they took over. (Yes LO, this is a compliment, i'm not just bashing you guys).
In fact, my post about this specific derogatory word being randomly tossed into the game as a reward title, should show how much I've come to respect LO for their stances and their attempts at bettering the community via rules and moderation/GM's etc etc. It's IMO disappointing that they in this way joke with their own TOS, because it sends the wrong signal to people who look for excuses and greenlights to insult others with this type of derogatory language.
I think Matt understands that and I really doubt he had a hand in this or was aware of it going out. I guess we will wait and see.
-
Quote54 minutes ago, Tigrix said:
... imo you missed the point.
QuoteI'm afraid you are not the authority in deciding who understood your post and who didn't.
Well I am when using the context of IMO, unless you don't know what IMO is an abbreviation of.
QuoteLast time I checked, the word "fuck" was pretty derogatory. So was "b!tch". So was "motherfvcker".
Oh? list me where fuck is a derogatory term please. I saw lots of people using "fuck" in district and never heard or saw a GM hush them or say hey chill your language.
It's a commonly used curse, but is it a derogatory insult?
QuoteYou omitted point 9.4.3., which explicitly states that determining whether something breaches this is left to "Little Orbit's absolute discretion". They have the final say in whether something is defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, harmful, harassing, hateful, invasive of another's privacy, sexually explicit, offensive, or denigrating to another person's reputation or social standing.
Lying by omission to prove your point is not the way to go.
Oh, but again - I've been saying THE WHOLE TIME that this is the determination of LO. They set the boundaries.
See? This really proves how badly you miss-read my original post. My entire topic was about LO crossing the boundary when using such a term as a reward title in their game.
LO should be an example of their own TOS, i've literally said it since the start of this thread, how did you manage to still miss it by now MartinPL?
And luckily I do think that LO has more reason and rationale than the infamous segment of the community that frequents this forum the absolute most. -
1 minute ago, Solamente said:at best little orbit rewarding a title with wh*re in it might create a loophole when calling players with that specific title wh*res but i don't understand how you've managed to wrangle this around to it allowing someone to call any player a wh*re, there's clearly a disconnect somewhere
and no i don't really think titles or rewards really have a limit beyond what will garner too much negative PR, and having a title with wh*re in it is nowhere near that arbitrary limit in a game most players expect to be a gta clone
its already been mentioned several times, but the use of wh*re seems insignificant in a game that references no/sex trafficking, bestiality, describes female contacts as "bitches", etc - is the issue specifically that this title is a new (is it even new) addition? if little orbit added a new mission tomorrow and the mission stage flavor text referred to the other team as something offensive, would you take this as a complicit allowance that you are allowed to call every player that offensive term, regardless of mission or faction?
Good argument, but this is the flaws;
As a game developer (personal life also), IMO you're responsible (in most countries, even by law required to have a EULA) for setting the rules and boundaries of your community/game.
Every game/community usually does that via a TOS that users have to agree to follow.
When LO took over, one of the first things they did was run through the current TOS and update it and re-issue a Little Orbit rules of conduct/tos.
That's not strange, that's expected. Each company have their own slight adjustments, but generally there's a broad understanding of whats okay and not okay, as these TOS'ssimply rely mostly on common sense and what you'd expect to behave as IRL. (luckily, most people can generally agree to whats common decency and whats not:o)
Copy Pasta from LO's eula:
9.4 You shall not (and you agree to not) generate any User Generated Content, or use the Game in a way, that:
(a) is defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, harmful, abusive, harassing, hateful, invasive of another's privacy, sexually explicit, or offensive (whether in relation to race, sex, religion or otherwise) or denigrating to anyone's reputation or general standing (whether or not actionable);
UGC vs DGC.....Since this is developer generated content, they're IMO greenlighting the same type of vulgar language that they don't want their players to use.
People can try clutter the subject with insults. Others can try to argue "well you don't HAVE to use it..." ...., but surely you can see that it's entirely besides the point.
I also don't have to name my character XXXXXXgger and get banned for violating the TOS right... it's a self-choice. But when the company itself is using such language as content rewards in their game, then yeaaaaaaah, something seems very very awry.
I refer to my previous statement. A game developer company should exemplify their own TOS before they ask that their players do.
-
13 minutes ago, MartinPL said:Just out of curiosity, why did you choose to respond to only that specific part of my post? Did you accidentally or knowingly skip the part where I point out that this is one of many mature themes in this M-rated game?
Actually no, I read all of your long post. But as I replied... imo you missed the point.
We're not arguing whether APB has mature this or that in it, Kyoki already pointed out before you that there's words as "fuck" and toe-sucking (which imo, neither those terms are listed as derogatory terms anyway?).
This topic is whether or not a line has been crossed and imo LO is crossing a line when they're greenlighting a clear derogatory term as a reward title.
It doesn't matter that you "choose to use it or not" ... you could say same for ALL titles then and literally add the word ... (i won't post it, but there are lots of racial and sexual swears out there, i'm sure I don't have to list them under the silly argument of "well duhhh, just don't use it".)
I feel a game developer company should exemplify their own TOS before they ask that their players do.
-
4 minutes ago, Solamente said:i've already said there's a difference between someone voluntarily calling themselves a wh*re and someone slinging the word at others, so no i do not see the irony nor do i think i can really help you understand the difference if you don't already
Uhm, ALL titles are something we choose to wear or not wear.... THIS has nothing to do with the fact of a very derogatory word being greenlighted by LO as a reward.
So titles have no limits by your logics then, and you find that a good argument, ok then
I won't use racial examples, but by your logics I could as a developer and then say "well who cares, don't use it then". -
2 minutes ago, MartinPL said:The thing that I find the most funny about this is that the word "wh0re", which is oh so problematic, is included in a title. It's never going to be aimed at any other player. It describes your character. If you don't want to title yourself a "candy wh0re", just use a different title. No one — not a single goddamned person in this game — can force you to wear that title if you don't want to.
You managed to miss the entire point of the subject.
It's not that anyone forces you or me to use a title - it's the fact that using a known derogatory term as a reward is greenlighting that term as being perfectly acceptable.
At the same time, you don't want your players actually using that term in any public/district chat.
As I asked Solamente, i'll ask you too;
How deep does that rabbit hole go then? where is the line drawn then if not by LO following their own TOS? Or are you arguing that the TOS doesn't mention swearing, racial, sexually etc etc as rules that we all are supposed to abide and accept? -
11 minutes ago, Solamente said:the context very clearly pointing to the "secondary" definitions were conveniently left out of the original post
maybe i'm reading too much into this but did one of you get a warning or something for calling another player a wh*re?
because it seems like there's a (hopefully) obvious distinction between calling someone a nice lady and someone voluntarily displaying a title
So you can't see a problem in using officially listed derogatory language as a title reward?
The same language that you don't want your players using in district chat, you add it as titles? you don't see the irony here Solamente?
How deep does that rabbit hole go then? Which word is then derogatory by your standard if wh+re isn't?
And how do we go by the policies that we're supposed to "agree to follow" of the game then? That little box we have to click after each update.... Tell me then, do we define sexual swearing and racial swearing and yada yada so on, via dictionaries and how these words are used by the vast majority of people?.... or else, what do we define the "rules" by exactly then? Gaterons den' rules? lol.
-
Oh my, you went full out with the furry insults and all.... sorry, I didn't realize I hit such a soft spot calling out your den living-ground mentality.
At least you didn't use the next 10 lines trying to convince me how you've got a real life and all.
7 minutes ago, Solamente said:it's not really limited to guys calling each other wh*res, but yeah
your own first link shows multiple definitions for the word, some of which are clearly gender neutrali just don't understand why this instance of potentially offensive language specifically is a problem, especially when equipping the title itself is completely voluntary
In those same links, contextually they firstly address it as being known use to describe females.
Further links:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pl/dictionary/english/nice lady
(How many dictionaries do British ppl need btw?)
I don't deny that guys can call each-other whatever they want. Hell, some guys probably even refer to their male friend as bitches.
That doesn't change the definition of the word though, neither how it's used by the far far majority of people and hence defined and published in dictionaries.
As for this specific instance, IMO - I made this topic for the EXACT reason I wrote in the OP.
IMO, this is one step too far, when a company greenlights such known derogatory word as a reward?
Then that same company can't possibly pretend to hide behind rules of "TOS" and "no sexual swearing allowed" or other bs that they warn players for.
Consistency in policy, is a minimum requirement to be taken serious imho. -
43 minutes ago, Gateron said:Wh0re is used gender neutral. Wh0re is not a good word to use while this game 18+. Maybe you should also go cry on the GTA forums about how the main charachters insult strippers and say the word b1tch and wh0re enough times. This is just Virtue Signalling and Gtfo. Its not 100% only used on women because you heard from other feminist. You are not a creditable source.
I don't think we need to argue the derogatory nature of the word wh0r. Anyone with half an interest in that argument can look it up in oxford, mirriam or w/e preferred English dictionary they wanna cite from.
Sorry Gateron, your personal feelings don't make words have no meaning, regardless how badly you wish it. As said above already nicely, a word with no meaning is simply scattered letters.
The word in this topic is defined in every major dictionary, which makes your entire point null. You're clearly wanting an argument based on how you personally perceive words, not based on how they're publically and officially defined. So let me repeat, as I said to you once already... eventually, you'll HAVE to grow up and have to adapt to society as it is.. not the rules of your walled up den behind the monitor.
41 minutes ago, Solamente said:the forums have a 13+ rating because there is no age gate to access it afaik, as opposed to the game which is rated M (or whatever the equivalent is outside the US) and requires an account to play
perhaps my experience is because i live in the US but nice lady is definitely used towards both genders and given that little orbit is a US based company its likely they share the same experience
that aside, the game has much more explicit language used so i'm not sure why this specific instance is more important?
Yeah, that must definitely be an American thing, guys calling each-other "whores".
Mirriam:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nice lady
Oxford:
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/nice lady
Quotenice lady
noun
/hɔː(r)/
/hɔːr/
(old-fashioned) a female prostitute
(taboo) an offensive word used to refer to a woman who has sex with a lot of men
You dirty little nice lady!
You look like a common nice lady in that dress!
Merged.
32 minutes ago, KyoukiDotExe said:This game is from 2010.. There is even a subtitle that says "i'll let you f my sister'' or ''feet pics''.
It's only virtual, I don't see a problem with this. If anyone wants to use a title as Candy wh0r3 then go ahead lol.
The word "fuck" is absolutely fine, isn't it?
and idk what you mean by "feet pics" .. is the word feet or pics or the combination of them some well known derogatory defined word? o.O
What I mean is.. your examples has nothing to do with the topic.
Mirriam:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nice lady
Oxford:https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/nice lady -
I don't think we need to argue the derogatory nature of the word wh0re. Anyone with half an interest in that argument can look it up in oxford, mirriam or w/e preferred English dictionary they wanna cite from.
Of course the trolls come out:D these forums never fail.
Sorry Gateron, your personal feelings don't make words have no meaning, regardless how badly you wish it. As said above already nicely, a word with no meaning is simply scattered letters.
The word in this topic is defined in every major dictionary, which makes your entire point null. You're clearly wanting an argument based on how you personally perceive words, not based on how they're publically and officially defined. As I said to you once already... eventually, you'll grow up and have to adapt to society as it is.. not the rules of your walled up den behind the monitor
-
2 minutes ago, Gateron said:keep crying because of a word... Go do virtual cringe shit with your e boy Tigrix lmao. A word has no meaning until you give it attention good job btw. Its a TITLE if someone uses it it doesn't hurt you or other players. Unless you see yourself associated with the word Wh0re KEKW.
Maybe you'll grow up one day and realize why reality doesn't work like that
With your "logic", people can tout racism, sexism and any other ism' freely because Gateron says words have no meaning.
You might be the real e-boy here, it definitely sounds like you've been stuck behind behind a screen for way too long.-
1
-
-
Just now, Solamente said:there's a wh*re title?
In the easter event, it's among the 3 new titles. -
Just now, Gateron said:Nah you are just a SIMP
ah okay.
-
Isn't using a word as w-h-o-r-e in a reward title in your game, sort of the same as blue-printing it as an okay word to throw around? I mean most kids are very susceptible to reading the language and usage of it, in their surroundings and if the game company itself is okay'ing such language, then why would any players feel it's wrong tossing that term around in chat when arguing with other players? o.O
Trust me, I hate the whole WOKE movement and I think it's gone completely berserk, like a pendulum swinging completely opposite spectrum of balance...... but in this case I feel like it's absolutely the wrong signal to send to your playerbase.
Comic fact: I can't type that word on these forums because it's censored... the irony.
@MattScott[edit added for clarity] >>
Firstly, since LO took over APB, they've inherited the game "as-is", by all definitions and standards, that's the outcome of taking over an active project.
All the mature stuff that is in APB, is taken as-is and personally as I already made clear with my reply to Kyoki, there's IMHO nothing wrong in tough language, aka "fuck" or "suck" or w/e examples.
That's APB, that's the mature rating. I don't see anything derogatory insulting in the word "fuck".
Anyway, LO inherited APB as-is and right away made a very clear point of wanting to ASAP update the eula to their "own standards" (if you dig among the first posts of LO, this was the primary first topics).
All good so far yes? Aka, they've shown responsibility imo so far. They take a pride in the work they do and they understand that they're the ones in charge and being looked up to in a certain way for "whats okay and whats not okay". They made a big point of wanting to re-establish in-game moderation (active GM's partaking in chat and actually warning/moderating for TOS violations).
All good so far yes?
Ok, so LO imo so far has made good strides to try and turn this community around to a more positive and shall we say... functional one.
I'm not saying they've done any miracles or anything, ofc not ... but they've definitely improved the community IMO, since they took over. (Yes LO, this is a compliment, i'm not just bashing you guys).
In fact, my post about this specific derogatory word being randomly tossed into the game as a reward title, should show how much I've come to respect LO for their stances and their attempts at bettering the community via rules and moderation/GM's etc etc. It's IMO disappointing that they in this way joke with their own TOS, because it sends the wrong signal to people who look for excuses and greenlights to insult others with this type of derogatory language.
I think Matt understand that and I really doubt he had a hand in this or was aware of it going out. I guess we will wait and see.-
7
-
2
-
-
Yeah, lets make APB even less diverse and fun than the recent patches from the "veteran crew", which literally almost killed the game. Yeah right before the corona crisis, the apb pop was lower than it has EVER been before. I guess Corona "saved" APB, while it's no fun and no joke for the world, at least for APB it did "something".
The recent patches already made JG corner camping 10x more effective by removing the ability to restock grenades easily for corner clearing during mission gameplay or even using explosives as a primary, cus "hey, yo, fk ur ammo crates^^, fire your 6 opgl nades and then suck it hohoho". Cus' so many players was using this "overpowered explosives" as primaries am-i-rite? hahaah, yeah, like 0.5% .. but hey, lets nerf it, cus we wear black hoodies and only use JG and PMG luls.
Corner camping has immense advantage in a 3rd person view game as APB where you can hold a corner without having to expose yourself. Grenades and explosives in general is supposed to be the counter to people refusing to leave corners/push/move around. Instead you get this certain crew trying to remove explosives entirely so their corner camping playstyle can be the BE-ALL-END-ALL, adapt or quit luls.
How about git-gud and if you can't beat an opgl user, you probably suck, otherwise there would be just as many OPGL users as there are right now JG and PMG spammers:)
Thx for a nice patch nerfing nfas to the ground, it really changed "a lot" now 90% of the playlist in FC uses PMG and JGs lol, beautiful balance again from the "veteran crew".
@MattScott
you honestly should start listening to some other players than the same ones with their identical playstyles and lack of respect for anything else in the game.
At least start using your numbers that you like to bring up.... how about looking at % of explosive primary users and wondering then why your SPCT crew keeps trying to get you to nerf it, despite there being like less than 1% usage? Meantime, take a look at JG, PMG, NTEC usage stats? especially JG.... cmon, use the numbers instead of listening to fools trying to turn your game into CS:GO.
-
1
-
-
The new hardware ... was actually old
Engine Upgrade - Beta Stream Announcement
in General Discussion Archive
Posted
There's a lot of poor PR moves by LO lately, mostly because they've only been getting a certain view from a certain person that has a lot of questionable friends. (Mods that got FF'ed?)
But at this point they've chosen the direction for APB and who they listen to, so it's not even useful anymore pointing out that there should be a difference between "controversial picks" and downright picking dudes that've been banned multiple times and did their best to wreck the game before they suddenly did a 180" and now we all have to "shh shhh" leave them alone and not bring up their past, because LO forgave them on our part, unknowingly and uncaringly of how long and persistently some of those names was shi**ing on the game and players.
Should have been a miniscule amount of investigation that it's not a false ban when someone was re-creating accounts many times, knowing it would take FF another few months to catch up with the analytics ban method.
Oh no, here comes the down-vote army, but let's be real, these forums don't represent the active community and hasn't since years.