Jump to content
Forum rules

neophobia

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    2981

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by neophobia

  2. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    if they do this, give it a reasonable limit, like max 3 accs into one. i wouldn't mind a fee that atleast reflects the amount of additional character slots etc - but i guess more would definitely be reasonable

    • Like 1

  5. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    42 minutes ago, ScarecrowXIII said:

    I want to just say NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. But I'll wait til I have a valid argument other than "Fuck you, I hate percs!"

     

    Got it:

    It doesn't need a buff because it's pretty strong as it is for both LTL and lethal gameplay. Any stronger and it would render other types of grenades useless for anti-personnel combat with it's already quick throw time and impact detonation.

    it's basically the even lamer version of qs

    + panic button

     

    there u go

     

    macchina calabria kits>any car buff

  6. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    8 hours ago, SpeedyCat said:

     

    You all know that it costs money to maintain a online game and that it is eventually necessary to sell their products to the players to assure that the game can stay online and running with good Support?!

     

    Sure, it would be nice to get all stuff for free or for a price as low as possible....

    but that is not possible all time.

     

    I only buy Account wide weapons, the other option make no sense for me because i have 14 chars on my main and i want to play with all chars this weapons. I have spend much money on my Acc but that is not the case.

     

    The case is that all the purchased stuff spams my ingame mail after new char creation with over 500 or more mails and it drives me crazy every time to accept them... xD

     

    But i understand what you mean....

    ? i have ~65 acc wide perm weapons (excluding legendaries)

     

    i would pay more for an acc wide kit than a char one

    i own several char kits too

     

    just saying, right now i have to create cars on one char only, otherwise i could do so on each of them - if i had the kits

    that doesnt take any money away from them, i have no real incentive to rebuy them anyway on the others - since i could just send them over. i could just be a bit more lazy then.

     

    and/or use the kits for the cars i already bought accwide.

  7. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    1 hour ago, Maverick13 said:

    Character Bound option is useless... Let's agree on this, if you're gonna buy, buy for account. It's way better. And of course, you can have 4 chars as default per account, so you can use only 1 char but keeping the weapon if in the future you want to create another one.

    And CLOTHING, CAR KITS WITH WHEELS AND AUDIO. All of'em should be ACCOUNT BOUND too.

     

    EXAMPLE: You'll be able to purchase WARAGI PIONEER as ENFORCER with Account Bound option. You'll receive the normal ENFORCER WARAGI. And when you decide to create a CRIMINAL... No problem, a CRIMINAL VARIANT of WARAGI will be at your mail waiting you.

    people still buy the character ones

    why would you force them to pay more

     

    tbf, having the option to get everything accwide would be nice - right now it's only weapons, skins and some packs. the packs give cars and kits too tho.

  11. Posted

    6 hours ago, Deathshow99 said:

    I'm not ending it because people disagree, i'm ending it because clearly nobody want's that mechanic, just like everything else.@Lixil

    quite some people were positive about it - but not in the old state

    so arguments/discussion about how to change it are quite good

     

    (sorry lixil, can't remove the tag from the quote for some reason)

  13. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    Can't wait for my aw3418dw to arrive on tuesday to do this aaaaaaaa

     

    isn't this possible with the advanced launcher anyway? or are there more changes needed?

    KKKC375.png

    this should be fine right?

     

    don't mind the other checkboxes, i have no idea why this stuff was enabled, just changed it.

  14. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    20 minutes ago, Excalibur! said:

    Is that harassment? Well, good to know.

     

    You can use words for something you know... everyone can see who voted each option.

    it is, if you think this is

    On 6/11/2018 at 5:37 AM, Nymphi-DoubleDee said:

    Should OP be forum banned, or not? Yes or No?

    Because your title is "Should it be nerfed or buffed?" And then Yes or No.

    And for the other bit: Of course you can - usually - but I already wrote an elaborate explanation why this is ambigous - and why you are wrong in this case.

    (If you go by the question of the poll (which you put the answers in for), not the title one.)

    And although you put some bias in the title, from the poll I couldn't possibly judge since you voted for all of them.

  15. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    On 6/11/2018 at 5:42 AM, Excalibur! said:

    Why the harassment? And you are kinda hypocritical when you got your game account back...

     

    Because if it is nerf its yes and buff no, and people voted no. You just cant understand a simple vote, pls stop.

    Kinda hypocritical to harass people because they were banned :^) It's not like all of them were for a good reason. While I wasn't subject to any bias etc I saw it happen.

    I'm not talking about any particular case though.

    On 6/11/2018 at 9:49 AM, Excalibur! said:

    No, i said yes to beef.

    And my poll is buff or nerf and plenty of options, not only yes...

    Hint: You could just write "Buff" or "Nerf" if you already are able to put in such a variety of options.

    And no, you didn't.

    If you have an OR - a logical disjunction - yes/true means either or both. No way to find out which of the two options was actually chosen.

    No means neither.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction

    There is no definite way to interprete this, even if it came down to common sense/colloquial stuff.

    You threw questions with alternative readings together and expect us to answer with polar ones.

    Enjoy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/disjunction/#DisjLang

    https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1638&amp=&context=pwpl

    You did not put any obvious bias in there either - which would determine what you meant (to some degree)

    https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-syntax-of-yes-and-no-9780198701859

    On 6/11/2018 at 4:13 AM, Excalibur! said:

    It was nerfed before, it killed with 3 bullets... and now with 4. It kills faster than act and is way more accurate at cqc. The equip time is killer.

    Every time i equip this gun as main i instantly start to do well with it. It also has a psychological attack: if you kill with snr the enemy gets humillated and they start getting nervous.

     

    The evidence:

      Reveal hidden contents

    dyKtX2R.png

    No definition of what yes/no means here either.

  16. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    On 6/13/2018 at 3:51 PM, Thial said:

    the point is that lets say some gun can fire a shot every 300 milliseconds. Let's say you fired 3 shots. 1st one 0ms delay, 2nd 368ms delay, 3rd 349ms delay where scroll wheel fires 1st 0ms, 2nd 300ms, 3rd 300ms so while naturally the player's ttk would be 717ms with scroll wheel it would be 600ms. You wouldn't be able to achieve that naturally that's why it's cheating imo.

    You could though. Why not? The human reaction time + muscle memory should be capable of getting results very close to it - and it's not like you get it with the mousewheel every time anyway unless you really spam it (because it doesn't even go THAT fast), and then you'd mess up everything else.

    Right?

    It's not as viable as you claim.

    Well, to be fair, I've never tried after I've done it when I was new to the game - thus I have no idea how much it actually helps. Just thinking about rate the mousewheel clicks + the weapon can be shot makes me believe you need to spin it very fast to get matching cycles - and that you can get the same result not much more effort when just clicking. I feel you are being way too nitpicky and stubborn about this.

    It just makes it a bit more easier in some cases. But this is like complaining that people with red switches need less actuation force than blacks and thus can click faster. It's more of a matter of personal preference to me. If you played with a trigger, instead of a button, you could just spam it more too. If you have mousebuttons with better rebound, you could spam it more too - etc pp.

  17. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    I went to kindergarten, primary school, "grammar school" and am at university right now. (grammer school + uni are not really posh/expensive over here.)

    I'm working as a tutor at that uni for 10h/week and at Dell for 20h/week parallely to be able to afford my... living?

     

    That's my life till now. Not very exciting. I am glad about the latter bit to be quite honest cause... well, feels like enough trouble to me right now.

    I wonder if I could handle more tension etc.

    Well, I'll be done with my bachelor thesis on tuesday so I'll see what future I'll have from then on. I can't say that I really wanna see though.

     

    (21)

  18. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    42 minutes ago, Seedy said:

    ive never even seen this happen! Maybe iv been away too long 🙂

    Ah, Anarchy was just in once and for a short time, like 3? 4? years ago.

     

    Was around the NSSW release I think since you could get a 10? day trial there - I think

     

    Edit: Actually 5 years ago.

    https://apbreloaded.gamersfirst.com/2013/05/anarchy-in-streets.html

     

    And I was right about the NSSW! And the 10 days!

    Damn.

     

    Late 5 year Anarchy anniversary? Anyone? No?

    • Like 1

  19. Posted

    41 minutes ago, ElectroStingz said:

    I believe a lot of people didnt like the concept that they had paid for a premium weapon and now someone could pick it up and use it. Personally I see it as a way for premium players to share some of their items, with the possibility of future sales as a result.

    As pointed out by others - no, that was not the thing.

    It was the implementation, no scoreboard, doesnt occupy a weaponslot, you don't swap the weapon but just gain it additionally

     

    I agree, it would be good that premium weapons would be shared this way - because people could see that they aren't any better than f2p.

    Also, sales of premium things are what keep the game going.

     

    All in all the concept was quite fun and cool.

    Keep it as a no resupply weapon though.

     

    It also promotes playstyles like in CS:GO like with the CZ-Auto (minus the economy bit (which is the biggest factor but w/e)), bring a weapon that isn't too great in general but kills a person quickly in some scenarios - and just be able to use it from there.

    This can be both positive and negative:

    1 hour ago, Spudinskes said:

    There's more to it than that. If a long range gunner is posted up on a high position that can't be killed easily from below (because he breaks line of sight when he's low or even has a shield down) you'll need to send in someone, probably a cqc gun, to kill him.

    While this sounds good and all, it just promotes to rush people instead of having proper tactics - and then you instantly have the advantage. No previous positioning etc required.

    Of course it mostly punishs bad positiong and tactics then.

    I like the "give them some of their own medicine" bit but ye. It isn't all too great.

     

    It isn't even wasted time anyway, since you just took the sniper down who was a pain. It's invested time.

     

    Idk. I would like to see a come back - but probably not in (regular) mission districts - keep it in FC e.g.

    Weekly rotating mission districts with modifiers? That would be cool - to me. But splitting the playerbase... uh.

     

    Polishing it also sounds like a lot of effort. The scoreboards are not too great as-is so I doubt this would come without issues.

  21. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    33 minutes ago, Keshi said:

    Oh lol... i had the background-size to cover. it looked great but not all resolution so i left it to 100% 100% so thats why it doesnt always scale that good... i'll prob put it back to cover 

    And it might not generate because of something you chose may be incorrect to the back end. For example the gun you chose. I am aware of that so if you can tell me which guns you used i can check the backend and see if i misswrote the imagepath ^.^

    weird. it works now. i had exactly those settings as i screenshot (tried 3 times, had the tab still open too)

     

    now it works.

     

    for the record: this is what i had

     

    X1p18lL.jpg

  22. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    10 minutes ago, Keshi said:

    The reason the background stretch like that because... the image is like that. all the background images are 500width 100height. I just downloaded it from apb.re
    So i locked the Div to 500 100 aswell

    EDIT: well it worked... lmfao thx for that. But soon i'll still remove the pastechi designs to a text where the user can fill something of their own tho, make it a bit cooler :')

    Second, well i think i was thinking legit on an anchor tag with a redirect to your community page/site instead of making the whole image a clickable link... I was thinking too far for something too simple 🤔

    Ah actually I just meant the background of the site lmao (the one with double b)

    If this improved smth, I am glad tho xd

     

    Ye, clickable link-portion seems impossible - unless you split the image into two parts, which is very possible. (but the clickable one would only be available as full heigth or width rectangles)

     

    anyway, I tried to use the site but it doesn't let me generate anything. I put all the text in and selected an image...

  24. Posted · Edited by neophobia

    On 6/13/2018 at 12:32 AM, SpeedyCat said:

    Nice work my friend 😉

     

    would be cool if you can type in some kind of Clan or Community Website URL which is an hyperlink/button to klick on it.

     

    On 6/13/2018 at 12:56 AM, Keshi said:

    well since the signature is an image, a hyperlink is impossible UNLESS.... i may have to check the signature settings in profile and see if i can paste raw html and make it into a signature with a space to enter your own link...  Will look into that and see if it's the same. If it is then it is 99% possible lol

    EDIT: looked into it. Using the HTML tag will just write the code instead of showing what the code should view #feelsbadman
    I'll see what i can think off in the future

    First of all: you can use "background: fixed center; background-size: cover;" for the background (in CSS/style) so it doesn't stretch that weirdly on the website (if the original one isn't, i didn't check) (minor thing)

     

    second thing: you can just use the editor here to turn an image into a link. simply click on the image and then the link button. ("tutorial" in spoiler - it works the same way in the signature editor (that one works with bbcode...))

    no idea how to automate that. bbcode doesn't seem to work (it simply disappears without changing anything) and you already tried HTML.

    hcnoCfg.jpg

     

    SuUp2jJ.gif

    https://i.imgur.com/SuUp2jJ.mp4

×
×
  • Create New...