Jump to content
NotTheEnforcer

Preventative Measures

Preventative Measures Against Cheating  

68 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Should there be more measures/anti-cheats introduced into APB to deter cheaters?

    • No, BattlEye alone is fine.
      22
    • Yes, replace BattlEye with something else.
      6
    • Yes, introduce additional anticheats alongside BattlEye (such as EAC/FF)
      40
  2. 2. Are you satisfied with the level of security in APB overall?

    • Yes
      24
    • No
      44

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/30/19 at 05:26 AM

Recommended Posts

I think this is a biased and unfair poll.  If the BE used now is only 34 bit and prone to hacker bypassing, but the team is working to upgrade the APB engine to 64 bit... then BE 64 bit version would probably work a whole lot better... so why should they waste money buying 3,4,5,6,7, anticheat systems for like 1000 players.... when it's sort of an alpha play at your own risk at rn... but it will be improved as they make the updates to the game....Hard to judge how well BE will actually be once we are using a different and better version of BE.

12 minutes ago, Thaumaturge said:

90% of the posts here are by people who hackusate regular high tier golds

LOL so true... but... why are they playing in bronze district which kinda invites rage hacusating fever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:

Daily 'I am silver and got destroyed so everyone must be cheating' thread.

 

Add it to the pile.

Yo wtf, why do you get so many dislikes?!
I am actually envious!

Maybe I should experiment with color and size

 

Gitgud scrubs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Halelulia said:

Yo wtf, why do you get so many dislikes?!
I am actually envious!

Maybe I should experiment with color and size

 

Gitgud scrubs!

reported for excessive formatting 

 

ggez 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BXNNXD said:

reported for excessive formatting 

 

ggez 

No buddy, the mods will recognize the effort 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:

Thaumaturgy isn't even a real magic.

wtf

 

are u trying to get ur cheeks clapped

 

u some kinda geomancer or some shit

Edited by Thaumaturge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hey! said:

I think this is a biased and unfair poll.  If the BE used now is only 34 bit and prone to hacker bypassing, but the team is working to upgrade the APB engine to 64 bit... then BE 64 bit version would probably work a whole lot better... so why should they waste money buying 3,4,5,6,7, anticheat systems for like 1000 players.... when it's sort of an alpha play at your own risk at rn... but it will be improved as they make the updates to the game....Hard to judge how well BE will actually be once we are using a different and better version of BE.

I didn't intend for it to be a biased poll, but I see the perception. The problem is that they implemented the 32-bit BE when its obvious it really doesn't work to BE's full potential. Granted they have planes for implementing the 64-bit, is it unreasonable to ask that there should be a capable anticheat until the 64-bit is available and implemented?

 

Plus, we aren't necessarily sure how well the 64-bit BE will ever fair. ArmA 3 still has it's share of cheaters running around in it and that's 64-bit BE as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...