Will LO Make JMBs Fairer For The Players?

[CookiePuss 5378]

16 minutes ago, Darkzero3802 said:

Isnt that the value of timed weapons? Especially 3 day ones?

It literally is not.

[Darkzero3802 611]

2 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:

18 minutes ago, Darkzero3802 said:

Isnt that the value of timed weapons? Especially 3 day ones?

It literally is not.

So whats the value of a timed weapon when its already owned perm?

[CookiePuss 5378]

6 minutes ago, Darkzero3802 said:

So whats the value of a timed weapon when its already owned perm?

Depends on the weapon... see armas for pricing info.

[Darkzero3802 611]

9 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

9 hours ago, Darkzero3802 said:

So whats the value of a timed weapon when its already owned perm?

Depends on the weapon... see armas for pricing info.

Rofl. Its worth 0 when u have it perm no matter what armas says.

[Yoss 31]

Pro tip @Darkzero3802. When you buy the box you are accepting that you may get a weapon that you already own as a lease. There is no need to change the system. If they made it not give you a duplicate of a weapon you own; you could just farm legendaries by purchasing all the lease weapons

[Darkzero3802 611]

6 minutes ago, Yoss said:

Pro tip @Darkzero3802. When you buy the box you are accepting that you may get a weapon that you already own as a lease. There is no need to change the system. If they made it not give you a duplicate of a weapon you own; you could just farm legendaries by purchasing all the lease weapons

Or they could change it up so u get something of value when u dont get the drop, like idk JMB or another currency to put towards stuff like what Overwatch has.

[Yoss 31]

But the whole point is to gamble. If there isn't a downside; what is there to lose?

[vsb 6171]

44 minutes ago, Yoss said:

But the whole point is to gamble. If there isn't a downside; what is there to lose?

the whole point is that it’s not supposed to be gambling 

[Darkzero3802 611]

3 minutes ago, BXNNXD said:

50 minutes ago, Yoss said:

But the whole point is to gamble. If there isn't a downside; what is there to lose?

the whole point is that it’s not supposed to be gambling 

Exactly and hence why the EU is moving foward with https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2018-09-17-15-european-gambling-regulators-unite-to-tackle-loot-box-threat as well as Washington state.

[Yoss 31]

Quote

Although no solid action has yet been taken, the international effort signals a major shift in the loot box regulation debate.

Did you read the article that you linked @Darkzero3802? 
There is no laws other than Belgium and it's debated on if it's mandatory. EA is REFUSING to back down to that law. 
 

Quote

EA, however, says otherwise, stating in April that its games were "developed and implemented ethically and lawfully around the world" and that it did not agree that its games could "be considered as any form of gambling." This, said EA CEO Andrew Wilson in May, is because "players always receive a specified number of items in each pack" and because it doesn't "provide or authorise any way to cash out or sell items or virtual currency for real money".

[Darkzero3802 611]

1 minute ago, Yoss said:

Did you read the article that you linked @Darkzero3802? 
There is no laws other than Belgium and it's debated on if it's mandatory. EA is REFUSING to back down to that law. 
 

I did and it says the EU is looking to make it illegal as well as Washington state in the US. Yes theres no other law, YET.