Ebola-Chan 59 Posted August 17, 2018 So for people to stop whining about weapon balance i found a new way to make people stop whining thats how it goes make golds have -50% hp and deal -25% dmg make silvers deal 10% more dmg to golds (not changed agains silvers and below) make bronzes have 50% more hp and deal 25% dmg to silvers and 50% dmg to golds if a dethreater is detected kick him from the aerver and roll him back to R9 ty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsb 6171 Posted August 17, 2018 so your genius idea is to punish people for getting better at the game? its getting harder and harder to tell what’s satirical these days Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unclean 45 Posted August 17, 2018 Not sure if trolling or Simple Jack Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SML 5 Posted August 17, 2018 4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict. And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ebola-Chan 59 Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, SML said: 4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict. And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat. there are way too many golds who are not even skilled i consider myself decent at this game im not a tryhard but i have never been silver and never abused the meta but i agree that 4 threats is not enough Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fortune Runner 796 Posted August 17, 2018 This looks like troll posts to me so in the art of trolling as a topic... If you want to mess with golds in bronze make them and their cars viewed on both the large and mini map while they are gold during the mission. Nothing like knowing where someone is to kill them easier not taking this thread seriously though Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ebola-Chan 59 Posted August 17, 2018 8 minutes ago, Fortune Runner said: This looks like troll posts to me so in the art of trolling as a topic... If you want to mess with golds in bronze make them and their cars viewed on both the large and mini map while they are gold during the mission. Nothing like knowing where someone is to kill them easier not taking this thread seriously though i doubt that it will work bronzes dont know what radar is Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CookiePuss 5378 Posted August 17, 2018 (edited) I dont understand why people still think changing threat names or colors, or even the number of threats would have any effect on the game. Its still going to be the same players with the same actual skill. So whether its the 40 threat levels we have, or 50, or 5, or 3. It will make no difference since it wont change anyones actual ELO rating ( or rather APBs version). So if your ELO is 800 (arbitrary number), it doesnt matter if that makes you Gold 6, Platinum, just "gold", or silver, or bronze, or some new name / color... you are still an ELO 800 player, and matchmaking will still match you against the same players it always has. Edited August 17, 2018 by CookiePuss 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KnifuWaifu 499 Posted August 17, 2018 27 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: I dont understand why people still think changing threat names or colors, or even the number of threats would have any effect on the game. Its still going to be the same players with the same actual skill. So whether its the 40 threat levels we have, or 50, or 5, or 3. It will make no difference since it wont change anyones actual ELO rating ( or rather APBs version). So if your ELO is 800 (arbitrary number), it doesnt matter if that makes you Gold 6, Platinum, just "gold", or silver, or bronze, or some new name / color... you are still an ELO 800 player, and matchmaking will still match you against the same players it always has. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsb 6171 Posted August 17, 2018 8 hours ago, SML said: 4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict. And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat. each threat color has 10 internal levels that are not shown visually, so in reality we have 40 different threat levels Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fortune Runner 796 Posted August 17, 2018 12 hours ago, Ebola-Chan said: i doubt that it will work bronzes dont know what radar is Who does not know what radar is in games now a days.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ebola-Chan 59 Posted August 18, 2018 16 hours ago, BXNNXD said: On 8/17/2018 at 9:54 AM, SML said: 4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict. And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat. each threat color has 10 internal levels that are not shown visually, so in reality we have 40 different threat levels is this why i aleayd get matched agains 4 people as 3 ? or get matched agains 4 silvers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites