MrLek 35 Posted December 22, 2022 (edited) 1 - Who owns APB Reloaded? Gamersfirst or Little Orbit? 2 - Who owns Gamersfirst? 3 - Does Little Orbit have full rights to do whatever they want with APB? 4 - What about Gamersfirst? 5 - What is the use of Gamersfirst? 6 - Why doesn't Little Orbit pass all Gamersfirst games into its name? Edited December 22, 2022 by MrLek Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NotTheEnforcer 222 Posted December 22, 2022 1 hour ago, MrLek said: 1 - Who owns APB Reloaded? Gamersfirst or Little Orbit? 2 - Who owns Gamersfirst? 3 - Does Little Orbit have full rights to do whatever they want with APB? 4 - What about Gamersfirst? 5 - What is the use of Gamersfirst? 6 - Why doesn't Little Orbit pass all Gamersfirst games into its name? 1) Little Orbit. 2) Gamersfirst was bought by LO. 3) Yes. They could stop all work tomorrow if they wanted to. 4) What about them? They dont exist as an entity anymore. 5) See 4. 6) They have. Gamersfirst is still used as a namesake address. I hope that answers everything. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ninjarrrr 255 Posted December 22, 2022 17 minutes ago, NotTheEnforcer said: 1) Little Orbit. 2) Gamersfirst was bought by LO. 3) Yes. They could stop all work tomorrow if they wanted to. 4) What about them? They dont exist as an entity anymore. 5) See 4. 6) They have. Gamersfirst is still used as a namesake address. I hope that answers everything. they dont have the full rights to apb after they sold it to the chInese haha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrLek 35 Posted December 22, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, NotTheEnforcer said: 1) Pequena órbita. 2) A Gamersfirst foi comprada pela LO. 3) Sim. Eles poderiam parar todo o trabalho amanhã, se quisessem. 4) E eles? Eles não existem mais como uma entidade. 5) Ver 4. 6) Eles têm. Gamersfirst ainda é usado como um endereço homônimo. Espero que responda tudo. Why are some people criticizing Little Orbit's work? L.O wanted a big update, they tried APB 2.1 and APB 2.2, but APB has a lot of problems and once again they tried something, only they had to go to the root of the problems, they went back a lot, APB 1.30. But L.O took years to understand that, because APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 were not worked on in a short time, it took a long time to work on both, good thing, they didn't give up, and a lot of people still criticize... L.O could have closed the APB a long time ago, but they didn't give up. The attempt of APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 served to show L.O where the error really was. Because just like us, they also thought big, but the reality is this: The APB has problems at the roots, in order to dream big we have to solve the problem at the roots, so that it can grow. We cannot treat this with the view we currently have on the problem, we detected the problem after many failed attempts, we learn from the mistakes... Edited December 22, 2022 by MrLek 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlienTM 138 Posted December 22, 2022 57 minutes ago, MrLek said: L.O wanted a big update, they tried APB 2.1 and APB 2.2, but APB has a lot of problems and once again they tried something, only they had to go to the root of the problems, they went back a lot, APB 1.30. But L.O took years to understand that, since APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 were not worked on in a short time, it took a long time to work on both, good thing, they didn't give up, and a lot of people still criticize... L.O could have closed the APB a long time ago, but they didn't give up. The attempt of APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 served to show L.O where the error really was. Because just like us, they also thought big, but the reality is this: The APB has problems at the roots, in order to dream big we have to solve the problem at the roots, so that it can grow. We cannot treat this with the view we currently have on the problem, we detected the problem after many failed attempts, we learn from the mistakes... +1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsb 6171 Posted December 22, 2022 8 hours ago, MrLek said: 1 - Who owns APB Reloaded? Gamersfirst or Little Orbit? 2 - Who owns Gamersfirst? 3 - Does Little Orbit have full rights to do whatever they want with APB? 4 - What about Gamersfirst? 5 - What is the use of Gamersfirst? 6 - Why doesn't Little Orbit pass all Gamersfirst games into its name? unit game owns the apb ip and little orbit is licensed to run apb reloaded little orbit owns gamersfirst little orbit can develop and run apb reloaded indefinitely, but they can't make new apb games gamersfirst was a trademark and a web portal, which little orbit purchased from reloaded games (the actual company people are talking about when they say "gamersfirst") see 4 little orbit seems to have made the decision that the gamersfirst brand was more valuable to keep despite the negative pr attached to it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NotZombieBiscuit 3146 Posted December 23, 2022 8 hours ago, NotTheEnforcer said: 1) Little Orbit. 2) Gamersfirst was bought by LO. 3) Yes. They could stop all work tomorrow if they wanted to. 4) What about them? They dont exist as an entity anymore. 5) See 4. 6) They have. Gamersfirst is still used as a namesake address. I hope that answers everything. Gamersfirst is technically also the 'platform' and updating launcher and web store and web portal and backend login systems etc etc etc etc etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
