Jump to content

Fortune Runner

Members
  • Content Count

    4844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fortune Runner


  1. I've been thinking of other accessories people  may want , and i do not think anyone said a cookie  or slice of bread in the  mouth.

    We already have cigars n cigarettes , but the anime cosplayers don't have the cookies n slice of bread for their clothing setups.

    I figured throw them a bone and they may even bring in more people who never played APB but like the customization for their anime chars.


  2. 3 hours ago, SquirrelFace said:

    They might be talking about Windows 10 LTSB or LTSC. It's basically a stripped down version of Windows 10 that only gets security updates. Perfect for people who just want their PC to work.

    its the security updates breaking  it though.

    thats why a lot of people dont like windows 10


  3. 3 hours ago, moxxichixx said:

    Get a real version of Windows 10 and it will work.

    windows 10 isn't real though? look at the mess it is and how updates break the entire computer at times. people didn't want to switch to 10  for a reason. *shrugs*


  4. On 6/10/2020 at 3:04 AM, Vreki555 said:

    I've contacted support and opened a ticket, #116959  19 days ago, Until this day I haven't received any answers, I have sent another message 4 days ago and still no response, what's going on ? This ticket is very important and as more time goes by you won't be able to help me. Why is it taking so long to respond on such an important ticket ? 

    was it separate massages / tickets ?

    if so then it is not the same ticket and they would not know right away.

    When updating status to a ticket , make sure to use the same ticket to send messages and update.


  5. There has been a few times now that when it should be able to call backup it has not given the option to.

     

    A silver and two golds vs four golds should naturally be able to call backup to make it fair.

    I suspect it has to do with a gold who disconnected and how two golds eventually joined but still may of counted the disconnected gold.

    one of the golds on our team went silver even though trying is best , so he wasn't even a high gold.

     

    anyways , matchmaking is a bit buggy with how backup could not be called again.


  6. On 6/8/2020 at 10:02 AM, botter said:

    For someone in SPCT your cognitive abilities are weak. Its not working properly because its banning silvers. That;s why we should unban everyone and start again just like we did with fair fight 🙂 Everyone was happy about that.

    What are the down sides?

    So silvers re innocent just because they are silvers?

    nice name by the way  🙄   , and no we do not need an unban wave.

     

    13 hours ago, Demonhead666 said:

    Mass unban needed. 

    why? give reasons

    • Like 2

  7. 1 hour ago, plainawful said:

    Why do you talk like google translate pirate? I have to apply next level mental gymnastics to decipher what you wanted to say.  Anyway game is so dead, that some hackerino and cheaterino producing websites have a dropped apb as supported game. EAC doesn't do nothing besides pick it's nose and check what color panties you got on. 

    thank you ever so much for giving us that mental image.

     

    But seriously I really don't see where op thought of this.


  8. I thought he meant something new that could be used on APB but all i found is this (for those who don't know what it is)

     

    https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/alert-vpn-vulnerabilities

     

    23 hours ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:

    That is just usual packet loss or some server lag. Stuff happens randomly.

     

    How does one use a VPN to exploit APB?

    no idea , I am lost as well.

     

    23 hours ago, Sayori said:

    Sounds like lag switching. There's no such thing  as "vpn exploiter"

     

    There is , but I see no relevance to APB

     

    • Like 1

  9. On 6/4/2020 at 1:28 AM, proxie said:

    Please no. No claymores in the game. It would just benefit defenders and slow the game.

     A claymore is  big n bulky so if they were limited to just one then it may be possible to balance them.

    two or more would be overkill and since they are explosive i would make it to where consumable ammo boxes can not refill them.

    but thats if they could be added and balanced to begin with , otherwise they shouldn't be here on APB

    17 hours ago, Sergsininia said:

    Another option would be to turn the smoke into an object, one that can be phased through, but not seen through/out of.

    I like this idea. Military targeting in real life needs visual confirmation for gear to work so it seems fair enough for APB to be the same after the engine upgrade

    • Like 1

  10. 49 minutes ago, R3ACT3M said:

    more terrorist than criminal.

    APB has military weapons so it would fit the lore for enforcers and criminals to have it.

    I had to weigh that in as well.

    and yes new animations would be needed for it.

     

    I remember the community talking about shooting through vehicle windows , but I do not recall any stance by Little Orbit on if they would like to rework the cars or not after the engine upgrade given how much there is to do.

     

    51 minutes ago, R3ACT3M said:

    Im talking monster trucks, semi's with the ability to ram through cars, and maybe buses with the abiliity to have multiple people shoot out the windows 😄 

    an 18 wheeler filled with booze for a new mission would be welcome. so a new vehicle for it would be needed so i don't know of any reason why not.

    we already have garbage trucks and trash trucks as well so why not make the city more alive with  a semi.

    we need a fire truck too. with all those cars burning and no fire truck? doesn't feel alive enough for a city.


  11. 4 minutes ago, RespectThis said:

    My point more so was that car surfer kinda makes the idea rather irrelevant. Due to 1. I'm sure the hitbox collision with players dismounting a moving vehicle would be awful. Would probably also lead to alot of teamkilling due to it. 2. Car surfer is faster in mounting and dismounting. You can reload weapons and resupply with ammo boxes. I'm not saying the idea is trash. I'm just saying that car surfer makes it a pretty meh concept. Plus what car are you going to put it on? The vegas and pio are the fastest and most durable. I can't see people sacrificing that for a mounted alig when they can just car surf with on.

    Thank you for going back and giving a detailed explanation. I appreciate it.

     

    When I posted that idea to expand his idea i had a few things in mind.

    IF car surfer is removed for some reason this could replace it in a way , and also because car surfer is so high to get that if its used in bronze district it tends to unbalance the match against lower players

    So my idea to expand on his was to give another option , but I honestly do not know if it is a good idea or not.


  12. On 6/3/2020 at 6:22 PM, R3ACT3M said:

    Then how bout some sort of mounted machine gun? while this i could see being quite difficult to balance but possible would be an interesting idea.

    A mounted shaw/alig on the back of a truck vehicle that the car ammo mod specifically can not replenish , and has no room for obj carrying , may be balanced enough.

    those trucks are not to sturdy so it seems possible , but I am not sure. Thoughts people?


  13. On 6/4/2020 at 2:07 AM, Mitne said:

    Exactly my though. From what I get this codes were given out on APB streams on Twitch (Didn't watch em? Fuck you!), Twitter (Where, when, I dunno, got alert set for LO channel), in-game (Asked around, nobody knows shit).

    I did not know where to watch it so I never got to.


  14. If i was going to change anything about opgl then i would change how well it could be seen after its shot.

    it can be dodged if you can see it. If there is lag , then Ill die for sure.

    we need the engine upgrade so people can play WITHOUT potato graphics. I doubt we could make it more visible without breaking something else otherwise.


  15. 39 minutes ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    No, take your own advice. You didn't even read. You are also twisting things in your own head, lol. I actually ignored you earlier and you brought something stupid up. I'm going to call you out on it, sorry not sorry. How about you actually read what I post instead of nitpick to attempt to fit your own agenda? 

     

    "Disclaimer : not my opinion just what others have said in the past on the forums"

    but also you same post "that doesn't mean I want to change."

     

    I thought this was not your opinion but yet you're treating it like your opinion. Weird...? 

     

    Now stop being useless here thanks. I've discussed my issues with the Ntec and what's wrong, I don't think people who supposedly don't care about winning or losing should have a say thanks. 

     

    2 hours ago, Fortune Runner said:

    Disclaimer : not my opinion just what others have said in the past on the forums

     

    Some people like guns that look and function similar to other guns , because they like the new look and not the old ones.

    I'm sure people can name them off for APB guns that fit this.

     

    that doesn't mean I want to change the star to be a clone of the ntec or any other gun , but a variety of looks for the same function is similar to clothing styling : everyone has their preferences

     

    Some people like reskins that look and function like other guns because they like the new look and not the old ones.

    that means Some people like reskins that look and function like other guns because they like the new look and not the old ones.

     

    I'm sure people can name them off for APB guns that fit this

    that means : there are guns in APB that work like say , the ntec , that work the same but look different. you know a reskin ? ok good.

     

    that doesn't mean I want to change the star to be a clone of the ntec or any other gun , but a variety of looks for the same function is similar to clothing styling : everyone has their preferences

    that means : I am not talking about touching  the star and make an ntec clone. *BUT* means an exception to the following - making new looking guns some people would want for style looks.

     

     

     

    Next :

    2 hours ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Hello?!?!? THIS. THIS. This is why we can't have nice things

     

    There's a large fking difference between a reskin gun designed to be one, and turning one INTO A RESKIN. I don't care that it's not your opinion, trust me I read that you claim it isn't. But this is wrong and the most incorrect way to "balance" things. The Ntec is not the STAR, nor should it be! Legit that mindset is why I claim what I do. 

     

    This is one of the biggest things I am advocating against. Get that shiz outa here. 

     

    The fact that you post a disclaimer to say it isn't your opinion, just to throw out something this utterly foolish, appalls me. Holy hell m8s. 

    Where did I say ANYTHING about wanting to change the star to ntec? NOWHERE.  but you made a bee line for me saying otherwise.

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Reread what I said. Look show stupid this post sounds. "I don't care that it's not your opinion, trust me I read that you claim it isn't." Hello? 

     

    "People have their own styles get over it. Not everyone has to be you rofl" That doesn't/shouldn't determine a gun's fate yo. What. So if someone's style is sucking patootie with one that's the solution? just change it so they'll be better? No, you learn to get better with a gun. That's called progression. Get that through your head. 

     

    I already acknowledged that you SAID that wasn't your opinion, but you clearly didn't read what I posted saying that. Why are you taking offense to it? This is why I call you on your bull dude. 

     

    Again, the Ntec was not designed to be the star or similar, it was designed to be it's own gun. There is zero reason to change it to be more like the star, jesus christ.

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Reread

     

    1 hour ago, Fortune Runner said:

    take your own advice.

    All of the above is why I said to reread what I said.

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Again, the Ntec was not designed to be the star or similar, it was designed to be it's own gun. There is zero reason to change it to be more like the star, jesus christ.

     

    1 hour ago, Fortune Runner said:

    I said reskins of guns to make new guns. YOU said changing the star to ntec. apples n oranges.

    And I did say that. YOU assumed anything you wanted about me yet again and in doing so tried putting words into my mouth , er hands , and now are blaming me for what you did to me.

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    This is why I call you on your bull dude. 

     

    1 hour ago, Fortune Runner said:

    I could say hi to someone and you'd be on me move along.

    All of the above and other threads you make a bee line for me ,and still are at that , which is why I posted this above.

     

     

    58 minutes ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    No, take your own advice. You didn't even read. You are also twisting things in your own head, lol. I actually ignored you earlier and you brought something stupid up. I'm going to call you out on it, sorry not sorry. How about you actually read what I post instead of nitpick to attempt to fit your own agenda? 

     

    "Disclaimer : not my opinion just what others have said in the past on the forums"

    but also you same post "that doesn't mean I want to change."

     

    I thought this was not your opinion but yet you're treating it like your opinion. Weird...? 

     

    Now stop being useless here thanks. I've discussed my issues with the Ntec and what's wrong, I don't think people who supposedly don't care about winning or losing should have a say thanks. 

    where did I twist anything? I even spelled it out for you yet again on this post. ( there's not that many oh this thread )

    But YOU spliced my post since you ASSUMED a lot about me.

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    How about you actually read what I post instead of nitpick to attempt to fit your own agenda? 

     

    "Disclaimer : not my opinion just what others have said in the past on the forums"

    but also you same post "that doesn't mean I want to change."

     

    I thought this was not your opinion but yet you're treating it like your opinion. Weird...? 

    Once again : you assumed a lot about me without rereading what i said.  It was never my opinion on what you claimed my opinion was , but you are obsessed with saying it is.

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    No, take your own advice. You didn't even read. You are also twisting things in your own head, lol. I actually ignored you earlier and you brought something stupid up. I'm going to call you out on it, sorry not sorry. How about you actually read what I post instead of nitpick to attempt to fit your own agenda? 

     

    If  you were ignoring me would you be all over me for any post? lol really? and once again take your own advice.

    And I even spelled it out for you on this post but I'm willing to bet you will still get it wrong and say otherwise.

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

     

    And Borus, you quite literally mentioned that as why it should have been nerfed and why you were glad it was, the CQC aspect lol. Why do you guys backtrack randomly?

    Edited 56 minutes ago by Abduct / Devote

    Now lets cover this yet again since you seem to be spiteful about the atac thread where I said the data collected by gun testing said cqc needed to be changed.

    I  did not say it was my opinion on that thread but yet again you DEMAND I said otherwise.

    I did say that if you didn't like the changes then to go suggest a retest for collecting data. by the way did you go suggest a retest since it bothers you so much? hmm ?

     

    Link to that thread and posts :

     

     

    and FINALLLLLLLY :

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Now stop being useless here thanks. I've discussed my issues with the Ntec and what's wrong, I don't think people who supposedly don't care about winning or losing should have a say thanks. 

     

    I had said on this thread about : at least 50 percent of people I have played against this past month had a n tec but it looked like more people than that.

    and you  didn't hesitate to tart up on me. Is it productive for you to be all over me for no excuse on this thread ? Wouldn't that be counter productive (useless) instead ?

     

    also to clarify :

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    I don't think people who supposedly don't care about winning or losing should have a say thanks. 

     

    many of us play for fun and play to win but we do not get butt hurt over losing , but instead say gg , as in good game , good fight etc because we play for fun.

    There's nothing wrong with being a good winner and a good loser , rather than a sore winner or a sore loser which there is plenty wrong with.

     

    so once again  BYEEEEEE

     


  16. 1 minute ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Reread

    take your own advice.

    2 minutes ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Again, the Ntec was not designed to be the star or similar, it was designed to be it's own gun. There is zero reason to change it to be more like the star, jesus christ.

    I said reskins of guns to make new guns. YOU said changing the star to ntec. apples n oranges.

    4 minutes ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    This is why I call you on your bull dude. 

    I could say hi to someone and you'd be on me move along.


  17. 1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Hello?!?!? THIS. THIS. This is why we can't have nice things

     

    There's a large fking difference between a reskin gun designed to be one, and turning one INTO A RESKIN. I don't care that it's not your opinion, trust me I read that you claim it isn't. But this is wrong and the most incorrect way to "balance" things. The Ntec is not the STAR, nor should it be! Legit that mindset is why I claim what I do. 

     

    This is one of the biggest things I am advocating against. Get that shiz outa here. 

     

    The fact that you post a disclaimer to say it isn't your opinion, just to throw out something this utterly foolish, appalls me. Holy hell m8s. 

    1. I never said I was talking about changing the star to ntec.

    2.  I said some people like reskins like for example how there's guns that function similar to ntec but look different.

     

    How many guns have been made to function similar to the ntec but look completely different?

    People have their own styles get over it. Not everyone has to be you rofl

     

     

     


  18. 20 minutes ago, RespectThis said:

    But why make a gun identical to the star?

    Disclaimer : not my opinion just what others have said in the past on the forums

     

    Some people like guns that look and function similar to other guns , because they like the new look and not the old ones.

    I'm sure people can name them off for APB guns that fit this.

     

    that doesn't mean I want to change the star to be a clone of the ntec or any other gun , but a variety of looks for the same function is similar to clothing styling : everyone has their preferences


  19. 1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Talking to you gets nowhere because you legit don't understand anything. If you don't have anything to contribute other than personal bull, don't. Thanks!

    That's nice , it didn't have anything to do with you to begin with so BYEEEE

     

    8 hours ago, Noob_Guardian said:

    I still see a lot of ntecs, though there are fewer than there used to be, and other weapons have popped up. For a while there you'd end up going against full teams of 3-4 ntecs. You know, because it's balanced and all

    seems legit

     

    8 hours ago, Noob_Guardian said:

    They'll jump on anyone and anything they know supported reworking/nerfing the NTEC. Even when the change was necessary, because they can't imagine that a weapon that overperformed most other weapons in the same niche was actually imbalanced.

    also seems legit

     

    also can we finally get new sounds for the guns

    as for the skins , I think with the new engine they may want to upgrade them to better looking graphics soonish , because people do like to look at nice looking games when they play.

    5 minutes ago, Synapze777 said:

    plz plz -- could we get this thread wiped, pretty plz.?

    i can agree to this


  20. 1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    "Past month, game with a small population." I'm sorry but you claimed that at LEAST 50% of the opp you fought over a month was using ntec.

    yes I did , and?  It's just my personal experience I  had. so what?

     

    1 hour ago, Abduct / Devote said:

    Again, I'm going to call out this bs. You're gonna have to prove that one buddy, don't try to hit reverse and back out now. There's no substance for anything you've said, you obviously didn't get my point but that's ok, I'm not truly surprised when it comes to you. 

    Saying my personal experience is to have substance of my own personal experience. what does it have to do with you?

    Whether you believe me or not that I went through that is on you , not me.

    One single statement to share personal experience and you jump all salty on me which is why i posted this second statement :

     

    5 hours ago, Fortune Runner said:

     

     

    I love how you two hear me say what I seen first hand the past month and the only thing coming from you two is to discredit me.

     

    literally all I said to share my personal experience and you two come off as to jump like that? lol whatever ya salty frags 🤣

     

    you are unwarranted on your behavior.

    7 hours ago, Fortune Runner said:

    at least 50 percent of people I have played against this past month had a n tec but it looked like more people than that.

    literally all i said that i went through.  no idea what you are going off for but whatever.

×
×
  • Create New...