Jump to content
Forum rules

Fortune Runner

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    4844

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fortune Runner

  2. Posted · Edited by Fortune Runner

    On 5/20/2020 at 4:22 PM, RespectThis said:

    It wasn't "far better"

    cqc the n tec dominated , so yes it was far better.

    Its why anyone who wanted to get the upperhand used it , and was known for it for an extremely long time. years. eons.

    not a backhanded insult  it was just a jest loosen up a bit. I'm not that type of person.

     

    Edited from being worded wrong. i was referring to cqc. ntec is meant to kill up to 70 m not taht it dominated at 70.

  3. Posted

    i am not certain about your problem , however it can be the timing of the server having lag from more people on. Little Orbit mentioned lag from a higher amount of people playing.

    hope you find out what it is good luck.

  4. Posted

    A new threat level would not benefit but would spread the population out instead. It would actually be a major negative.

    I would rather wait for when it is time to do actual reworking on threat and matchmaking since the  engine upgrade is needed to fix many other problems like phasing.

  6. Posted

    17 hours ago, RespectThis said:

    Imagine thinking the ntec needed to be nerfed at all in the first place. kek

    we know what crutch you preferred now.

    it outplayed any gun in any situation before the changes , so yes it was.

    now the ntec  is much more balanced and better fair play because of it. its what gun balancing means

     

    The Atac seems fine , the pmg I cant tell because of the lag lately from overcrowded servers ( its why Little Orbit mentioned needing more servers ) , and people need to stop saying to nerf everything just because they die for standing in the open like a blooming idiot.

    Damn straight I'm going to shoot you .  How stupid do yo have to be to not use cover? pew pew pew dieeeeeeee. NEXT

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

  7. Posted

    23 hours ago, HiLoSilver said:

    Since LO has Zero regard for the report feature it seems toxicty and wall hacking at the very least are on the rise.

    I really hate to hackusate but its getting a little ridiculous. Bring FairFight back or a reliable anticheat/.

    Flame away toxic froum gurus as you always do. 

    so many things wrong with this.

    Little Orbit has dealt with reports and certain people who the reports were about were very vocal about it and some admitted openly they were guilty of what the reports were about

    toxic people in bronze and silver are nearly non existent on NA so I wonder where you play.

    Spotter is a in game mod that alerts the team of what your team mate sees so coordinated attacks can happen

    fairfight was horrible. EAC is currently the best on the market and as I said in other threads I witnessed a blatant cheater get banned in front of me 2+ weeks ago and have not seen them since.

    flame away? sigh

  12. Posted

    21 hours ago, larvalis said:

    Long time ago I played APB Reloaded. I realy enjoyed it.

    I dont know what about the new Engine, but I was thinking about starting completle new again as enforcer. But I also remind, a sometimes very toxic player base. Not only those massive insulting by whispering from enemy players. Also  toxic attitude from your sidemates. Gold-Status player quitting as soon that they see silver or bronce in their match making, also insulting if they think your bad or just having a bad mood irl. Anything changed? Thank you.

    most of those players are no longer here. there's a hand full that do , and those people respond to the ones who go along with it. takes two to tango.

    i personally have not seen it in months since i do not do that behavior either.

    on the forums people say their ban list is full , but that also tends to be the people who are being toxic themselves when they argue with people.

    the rest of us keep saying our chat ban lists in apb are empty and that they might want to consider it might be them.

     

    3 hours ago, Roblo said:

    Or they could learn how to type in English, like everyone else. 

    there are countries that speak 9 languages and none of them are English , don't you think its about time others pull their own  weight as well then?

  15. Posted

    1 hour ago, RodriguesPTF said:

    You guys are moving off topic. What i wanted to discuss is what new measuers can be implement not if LO has a anticheat in place or not.

    and you just moved off topic by saying we moved off topic without adding anything for the topic... lol

     

    anyways , given the  low population , the low if any funding for APB , and unknown knowledge on our part of actual ban numbers with whom what where and so on , it is a safe bet to say that only Little Orbit can truly say what is possible , what is not , what would be liked to see happen and or tried , and what is unrealistic.

    And this conclusion of mine is because of the fact that Little Orbit has to work with a lot more than just anti cheating , but the APB servers and any other expenses as a whole as well.

    coming up wit ideas is fine , but can we implement them here and fund it ,  is just as important as well.

  16. Posted

    4 hours ago, MACKxBOLAN said:

     

    I have personally seen a blatant banned and never return from two weeks  ago.

    In the past cheaters/hackers loved the attention no matter how little and  a ban list of any kind would encourage them to pump those numbers up to freak people out , and they would succeed at that

    there's time I have been misinformed in the past from what G1 and the forums said back then , and when i was wrong i openly apologized ( you cant keep it real if you don't keep it honest )

     

    With that said , you know I am telling what I know about that ban to be as accurate as I can make it , and how I've kept an eye out for them ever since , and have not seen them once they disappeared.

    no anti cheat is 100 percent but i firmly believe we shot that blatant down hard even without a list. ( helps i witnessed it of course but that's why i share the knowledge of it )

     

    that's reason enough for pizza and beer to unwind and relax knowing EAC is doing something. ( unless you  like something else that  works with pizza too  , you know whatever you want/legal  to drink )

    • Like 1

  17. Posted

    14 hours ago, Aeronaut said:

    i couldn't find any other post about this

    is no one else bothered by these

    why are they so tall

    why is only 10% at partial opacity while the rest is 95%

    I thought someone would of posted by now how annoying it is to not be able to see through them and how badly they affect missions.

    it is as bad as  a bounty going off if not worse with how its hard to defend when you cant see

  19. Posted

    20 minutes ago, RodriguesPTF said:

    Yes thats true but it is up to us to ignore them. but this topic is about the measuers and their effect not about toxic players. There will always be cheating and toxic players with hacks or not what we need is to lower that number.

    two problems with that. 1 ignoring is why we don't announce bans ( its already being done ) and 2 the toxicity and cheating are both  part of the same problem  when referring to cheaters and go hand in hand.

    I also do not know what Little Orbit already does , since it was mentioned in the past about  making more changes to the anti cheat methods  , so it is unknown to me what they do now.

     

    contrary to other people i know  there are bans

    I witnessed one two weeks ago when a blatant cheater went  poof in front of me , and have not seen any blatant  cheaters since so I do not believe they returned

  20. Posted

    52 minutes ago, RodriguesPTF said:

    As he explains ppl have tried this with no good results. He also states that because this is an online game hackers will never be gone but if you put engough barries in the way they might be discourage.

    toxic people who take delight in others suffering only get encouraged more by the rush of defiling others who feel more secure.

  21. Posted

    1 hour ago, 404 said:

    we need less abusable spawns, not more

    like i said I'm surprised we don't have more at the way things were going , which is also why i defined a way to make it easy to not abuse them by making them breakable easily.

    and to clear this up further , i was not suggesting more  , i said  i was surprised it didn't already happen.

    17 minutes ago, cowhorseman said:

    clearly you need to learn to wonders of sniper camping car spawners for easy kills

    normally i would agree but with current server lag from a large amount  of people playing , it is not always going to work and the snipers can wind up dead instead. not to mention people teleporting around.

    • Like 1

  25. Posted

    7 hours ago, Sayori said:

    reports go straight to the bin

    I have to disagree by saying not all go , and that's if they do since we don't really know.

    I personally witnessed a blatant go poof in front of me around 2 weeks ago after myself and other district players reported him for being a blatant.

    however op mentioned shooting someone whos jumping and i suspect op reported on that , which is not a valid cheating report , so that should go to the bin if op did.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...