Jump to content

Poperon

Members
  • Content Count

    1658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Poperon


  1. 8 hours ago, wibsey said:
    Even though babies may cry, the whole rush of things show a clueless mind. If i was in there shoes i'd revert the weapons back to how it was until the team play n understand the game... Then think about balancing. 

    But i guess there's a stubbornness to wanting changes to happen, which I'm all for, If it's the right way... 

    100% agreed. They should have reverted things to ground zero, and start again with things that really need to be tweaked.

  2. 5 hours ago, YeOldLegends said:

    NO NO NO NO NO NO NO. Don't touch anything else right now. Don't fuck anything up anything else until we get an engine update done. 


    I think they should, really. We need more chaos and mayhem. Red mods and Shotguns aren't enough.

    Don't be limited to green mods, please mess around with purple, blue and orange mods... and don't forget to weaponize civilians with OSMAWs and OPGLs. Amen!
    • Like 3

  3. 3 hours ago, Elmensis said:


    The fact that LO thought that buffing a gun that typically 2-3 shots was necessary is a joke,
     


    Can't blame LO tbh. As i've stated before, they certainly got lured into thinking nerfing weapons first would be a good idea, instead of more important tasks first.

    During their first month, Forums had an stupid amount of Nerf Shitposting exploding on Social District. "Nerf Yukon, Nerf CSG, Nerf OCA, Nerf NTEC, Nerf the entire world" going on... which if you think, as "unbalanced" as it could be, people were still having fun, and used to that. They just needed to "buff" some badly optmized weapons like Cobra, nerf Yukon, and nerf HVR. Some other premium weapons too, but CSG was already nerfed to its existence. Now it's a stupid killing machine, with Shredder being the king of the hill. You know, i should be happy with all this "pointman buffs" since i mostly use shotguns, but i'm hating all this to my guts.
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3

  4. On 8/24/2018 at 5:16 AM, wibsey said:
    They shouldn't of touched the weapon mechanics until they understood the game... 

    That's my take on this whole debate. There are a bunch of more important things than tweaking weapons first... it's like being inside a house burning, and instead of taking your children and run away, you decide to get your smartphone first. lol

    What i truly think, is that LO thought balancing weapons first would be good, because of multiple cry babies whining about "nerf this, nerf that, nerf this particular weapon for me because it's not good enough for my personal taste. now nerf that because i demand so". All this certainly lured their attention to something so unimportant at first sight.

  5. 5 minutes ago, BlackJana said:
    Did you actually play around with IR3?
    Put it on ursus and you only needto hold lmb up tp 60m. Put it on NSSW and you only need to hold lmb, put it on ATAC and you only need to hold lmb, put it on star and you alnost only need to hold lmb. See a pattern?

    But according to people on this other threadThings are all nice and dandy, "EZPZ" they say?

    Let's turn APB into easy mode, that will certainly make things better wow doge

  6. 1 hour ago, Hexerin said:
    1 hour ago, Poperon said:
    So, you are one of those who just want freebies forever, huh?
    I have no problems paying for microtransaction content, as my Euryale attests (I'd also have the following few tiers of loyalty rewards as well, if they existed). I have a problem with releasing gambling features in video games, which is a viewpoint shared by anyone with half a functioning brain cell as it's obvious how damaging such features are to the industry as a whole.

    As obvious as Matt stating that free versions will be released in due time? Is that weapon all that of a necessity so you can't play the game anymore, if you don't get it?

    Well, that's my point. Matt stated he will basically attend microtransaction lovers and free to play players. What part of a brain does it take to understand it?

  7. 1 hour ago, BXNNXD said:
    3 hours ago, Poperon said:

    While i think there's too much crying going on, seeing that they are looking out to solve 2 problems at once, i still think 1200 for a name change might be a bit too much.

    1000 APB$ would do its justice.

    i don’t think making it free is a solution
    46 minutes ago, Keshi said:
    1k apb dollars is cheap...1 mission with premium and u can change your name more than 3times already lol...
    maybe 100k ingame is fine, or 5 dollars(500g1c) for namechange sounds fine to me

    Pardon my retardness guys, i just realized that i thought about G1C and wrote APB$ there.

    I meant G1C there, fixed it!!

  8. 6 hours ago, MattScott said:

    Hi there,

    We have contacted Amazon - several times - and no one responds. Unfortunately none of the staff we brought over was ever involved in setting them up. 
    My advice: Please complain to Amazon so they will remove them.

    In the meantime, we will keep trying to get them to respond.

    Thanks,
    Matt


    Something something tells me someone from Staff will need to drop by at Amazon to say "Hey"

    Amazon can be a real patootie. 🤢

  9. While i think there's too much crying going on, seeing that they are looking out to solve 2 problems at once, i still think 1200 for a name change might be a bit too much.

    1000 G1C would do its justice.


  10. On 8/4/2018 at 3:18 AM, Cutey said:
    fnmod_weapon_threepointsling3.png
    A few suggestions:
    + add delay to switch back to pistol.
    or
    + reduce weapon damage with this mod.

    3-Point Sling 3 shoud be ballanced.

    The negative effect of it would be you drinking bleach at the end of a match, and thinking that it needs a nerf.

    The mod is already not that great, you want to nerf it? I think you should join this thread
    Make nerf the nerf great again!!
×
×
  • Create New...