Jump to content
Forum rules

Yoss

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    288

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Yoss

  2. Posted · Edited by Yoss
    adding info

    This might sound bad but hear me out. Currently the reason cheats are updated and so easy to maintain  is the lack of encryption in memory and the binary itself. There are pubic tools for dumping and creating an sdk of sorts. PUBG repacks their binary daily; hence the small updates that happen often. This prevents cheats checking for a "signature" or "offsets"; meaning a section of memory containing all of the information tables that you could want to use.  Another solution is to do a linear aimbot check. If the path of motion is linear and has no human input it's clearly not made by a human. I believe fairfight has flags for this already. 

    As you stated; 

    Quote

    I am often sent videos, screenshots, or other forms of evidence that players feel "undeniably" shows that another player was cheating. And while I sympathize, please know that we cannot blindly accept this as a reason to ban someone.

    This is completely understandable. You're doing the right thing by not banning players that have done nothing wrong.

     

    The correct choice for an anti-cheat is batteye. But you shouldn't write out fairfight because it was badly tuned when you received it. It has the highest chance of catching a cheater if they indeed have a bypass for your custom client and battleye. I'd recommend in getting in contact with the support team and have it made the way YOU want it. Not the way g1 wanted it.

     

    Thanks for being transparent Matt. We all can appreciate that.

     

    • Like 11
    • Thanks 6

  3. Posted

    Well if we're doing freebies you could just give everyone that ever complains what they ask for and we'd all be better off. /s

    Though I don't think giving the skin out to everyone is a great idea; there are better alternatives than devaluing something people worked for. If you say the event is flawed then wouldn't their win be worth more? A title is also laughable. Old players have so many titles that it wont be used ever.

  9. Posted · Edited by Yoss

    On 11/24/2018 at 12:07 PM, MattScott said:

    Visit the ARMAS store from SUNDAY, November 25th – 9 PM PST through TUESDAY November 27th – 9 PM PST to enjoy double the loyalty reward points and get 20% off on:



    This 'sale' was absolute garbage. The 'packs' were the juggernaut and revelations packs. There was no  'and more' to it at all. 

  20. Posted

    Quote
    Although no solid action has yet been taken, the international effort signals a major shift in the loot box regulation debate.

    Did you read the article that you linked @Darkzero3802? 
    There is no laws other than Belgium and it's debated on if it's mandatory. EA is REFUSING to back down to that law. 
     

    Quote
    EA, however, says otherwise, stating in April that its games were "developed and implemented ethically and lawfully around the world" and that it did not agree that its games could "be considered as any form of gambling." This, said EA CEO Andrew Wilson in May, is because "players always receive a specified number of items in each pack" and because it doesn't "provide or authorise any way to cash out or sell items or virtual currency for real money".
×
×
  • Create New...