Poperon 141 Posted November 17, 2019 We know that Client wise it's getting better, but what about Server wise? Is it still necessary a huge NASA Datacenter to run it without setting everything on fire? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bambola 379 Posted November 17, 2019 Slightly off-topic: contrary to popular belief, NASA supercomputers can't run even less demanding games, let alone APB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsb 6170 Posted November 17, 2019 i don't think there's really any way to know that until we get public access to the engine upgrade testing, there's no better testing than 100 fully customized players actively playing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AsgerLund 1271 Posted November 17, 2019 23 minutes ago, Bambola said: Slightly off-topic: contrary to popular belief, NASA supercomputers can't run even less demanding games, let alone APB. Slightly offer-topic: the US Air Force stopped using 8-inch floppy disks to control their nuclear arsenal in June. This year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jorlak 41 Posted November 18, 2019 6 hours ago, AsgerLund said: Slightly offer-topic: the US Air Force stopped using 8-inch floppy disks to control their nuclear arsenal in June. This year. Before everyone thinks that they're just really stupid and outdated with their hardware. The reason for this is because the device they used was not connected to the internet in any way. Thus making it hard for someone to hack the device. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites