Jump to content
Forum rules

Sayori

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    689

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sayori

  2. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    Imagine asking this question then answer it yourself by calling the people in question "fake golds".... Yes, if they can drop to silver by losing 2-3 games they are not gold. Maybe too good for bronze district and too bad for silver which overtaken by legit golds and people whos whole life revolves around cheating.

     

    Then people with a dozen of bans show up to tell us how dethreaters chase away new players. Nah, people quit this game because playerbase is toxic, full of cheaters, no tutorial etc.  Just stfu. ( you know who I mean)

    • Like 1

  5. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    2 hours ago, Motorola said:

    the reason i dont like it is because they are the players being asked for opinions on what needs to be balanced instead of players who actually know what needs to be changed or adjusted.

     

    if you are silver its because you are playing poorly and if you are playing poorly then something aint right and they shouldnt be asking you about balance issues because u arent good enough to ask.

    Better be bad and silver than having extensive ban history and still pretending to be competent  :^)

     

    kthxbye

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

  6. Posted

    On 8/16/2020 at 11:21 PM, NotZombieBiscuit said:

    Most of the community is still delusional. 

     

    At this point I kind of just want them to push the EU so that all the non-delusional people can go "I told you so." as the game is finally shut down.

     

    But another part of me would rather see this game just shut down with what dignity it has left rather than continuing to ruin it just for the sake of a petty banter.

    Based, and if I may say, redpilled.

  7. Posted

    5 hours ago, ReaperTheButcher said:

    We should all be grateful for the progress Little Orbit™ did in 2 years that the old G1 couldn't do in 8 years

    What if I tell you that LO is the bigger company and with deeper pockets so your comparison is just not correct. Please stop riding LO's d... so I don't have to defend G1.

    They quickly realized the task is kinda out of their scope, let alone making a sequel, hence they sold the IP because I doubt the investors were quite happy seeing what a money pit APB is. They probably broke even after selling the IP and maybe even a bit on the top to fund the rest of the UE update and hope it's not going to massive blap so they can have additional revenue source...nothing wrong with it btw.

    Matt Scott is already pre-emptively making posts about the sh.t performance that's going to be in 40/40 action districts. If this game doesn't generate enough revenue after UE you can be sure they will pull the trigger.

    • Like 1

  8. Posted

    1 hour ago, Kevkof said:

    RTX is something that was made available (not even in the full array of GPU's) in the last 2 years.

    AVX has been on nearly every single CPU since 2011

     

    I think there's quite a big difference there

    What? The thing is that you can turn RTX on and off. And even in 8 years when technology is matured you would still be able to turn toggle it.

    Just a guess based on Steam's hardware stats and the clock speeds... probably 10% don't have avx .

    APB doesn't need neither can afford  to lose 10% of the playerbase. Very lazy solution from LO. Can't think  of another game(let alone 10 years old game) that just drops AVX mandatory requirement on its players, even most consumer software takes advantage on it depending on your CPU. Sure in finances/big data that might not be the case but it's understandable. And like said earlier this could be completely useless depending no their migration approach.

  9. Posted

    10 hours ago, Hexerin said:

    Your refusal to upgrade your PC from the hardware of a decade ago isn't the fault of Little Orbit (or any other game dev/publisher). They owe you nothing, get out of here with that nonsense.

    Nice logic there. Tomorrow they might decide to add ray-tracing without option to disable it. Then what?  Are people supposed to get RTX card? Really first gen i7 ain't that bad for APB, if someone is just going to play that.

    Lots of modern software utilizes AVX when available but DOESN'T ENFORCE IT.

    • Like 2

  10. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    4 hours ago, HawtGirl said:

    Do you offer refunds once when the new engine comes out?

    If this is what I was waiting for the past years, I am better without it.

    DcKxSQp.jpg

    Almost as if I didn't say some people won't be pleased when they find out they can't play because AVX or game MAY* run even worse because AVX-SSE transition penalties.  Although from what I've seen performance is definitely not impressive considering the high end hardware it was tested on. And mind you, this was only Asylum. It's yet to be seen on full 40/40 action district.

    Congratulations I guess.

     

    https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/avoiding-avx-sse-transition-penalties.html

    • Like 1

  12. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    2 hours ago, VanilleKeks said:

    I am going to re-schedule my Clubnight with the boys for this. I hope I don't come to regret this decision.

     

    Good fortune to all.

    As long as you go out and don't try to betatest, you are not going to regret your decision.

    I'm going to make drinks and watch the train wreck from a safe distance, then wait for people with non high-end gaming to find out performance is worse is about the same or even worse for them because avx.

     

     

  14. Posted

    6 hours ago, Mitne said:

    So let me get it:

    He looked up fairfight rules to know what properly triggers ban.

    He then gives that message after being banned:

    ZiIOZc4.png

    And then totally gets rid of FF because he by per rule got banned by it?


    You do realize it sounds like bullshoot, do you? Pretty sure he looked up FF rules to know what should and what shouldn't ban. And for him to say such thing means he was banned OUTSIDE ruleset.

    His "narrative" sticks.

    Clearly not since someone with zero experince whatsoever in playing APB could trigger it outside ruleset (but with a lot in bug testing).

    We don't talk about players banned 20 times for cheating (although FF is known to have "blacklist" of players which were instant banned). We talk about players which were like me: Played properly, got banned like I would use some insane cheats. But hey, it's not only me: (pulled just from front of page) players such as MrAfroGer, Mooke or Snubnose. You can say honestly, here in front of us all - that they were cheaters?

    The only guy who keeps it out of context so far is you. Don't try to justify outdated tool which ran on flags and manual bans as way to function.

    If not for LO, this game would be dead by now and that's fact. I trust their judgement fully.

     

    He wasn't banned outside the ruleset at all, but the ruleset had stuff that probably shouldn't be there and he replicated the conditions. I've played(and majority of playerbase) under FairFight for thousands of hours and I never managed to trigger it so I'm just going to say that this is rare and if he didn't know the rules he would have never been banned(most likely)

     

    Without clarification on what was the rule, how many people triggered the rule, how many times did they trigger it before getting banned(because bans were manual, except few), how many of them triggered other(proper) rules in combination, this statement is useless, it's a paperweight, stop throwing it around trying to discredit FairFight.

    And just because someone didn't cheat on their main accounts, doesn't mean they didn't cheat on alts and got busted.

    Btw playing properly doesn't include glitching under map during events. Just saying....in case you ever did that 🙂

     

  15. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    9 minutes ago, 404 said:

    my current "narrative" is just agreeing with little orbit that fairfight wasnt good enough lol

     

    that specific trigger possibly being rare doesn't exactly stop it from being an issue, nor does it stop any possible other issues that ended up with orbit switching to another anticheat in the end

    No, it wasn't good enough as server-side anti cheat is never going to be good enough.

     

    If anything, those quotes from Matt Scott prove that FairFight WORKS because he managed to trigger some really stupid and rare rule by replicating the conditions that had to be made. Of course it's an issue, but since he doesn't say how many times it was triggered and by whom it's just not good to use the statement to prove whatever point.

    So the issue is the rule, not like FairFight is not good.

  16. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    1 hour ago, 404 said:

    ZiIOZc4.png

    it came up in discussion on the unofficially official apb discord

     

    there's also these quotes from the first q&a

     

     

    You forgot something very important, but it's ok, no need to post it because it's against your narrative I guess...

     

    1mCDOQm.png

     

    If this rule is so very specific that chances to trigger it are thinner than lottery, he knew about it, did what it had to be done.

    And I'd say this was very rare rule to trigger considering majority of players didn't get banned but certain people...some over and over again.

    This really invalidates the entire test...

    But hey, lets keep getting things out of context.

  17. Posted

    Your ticket response time is not just where you don't want it to be at the moment. it hasn't been for 2 years. The current response time of 3.5 weeks is simply unacceptable. I was sort of keen on that, until I read a report from  2015 which states LO has almost 100 employees and 50 million USD annual revenue. So this is clearly not "LO is small company and doesn't have the resources"

    Anyway, glad you give perma bans...if you detect any decent cheat that is. My expectations happened - influx of cheaters, old names and "new" names, same people going 20+:1 in FCs.

    I still see that guy whom I reported a while ago and got response you will investigate? Guess not going to happen since he's SPCT , right? 🙂

    • Like 1

  18. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    Say what you want about G1 but at least they had a forum post about it and events. A true american company who loved America.

    That ain't happening with LO. But it's ok, they would make "Community standards" thread and bring divisive politics and make donations to BLM so they bail out arsonists who have assaulted other americans and their right for private property.

    So happy independence day to all americans who love their country and don't destroy statues 🙂

     

    inb4 post deleted and I'm given a warning for bringing politics even though they do it themselves


     

    • Like 5

  20. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    17 hours ago, Catgorl said:

    There are fundamental changes in RTX cards that APB was never meant to handle. The 64-bit approach Nvidia has taken with the architecture in these cards means that APB, being a 32-bit only game, will eventually crash when it tries to communicate with the GPU's memory.

    Ketog summarized everything we know about this :
     

     

    The game uses api to communicate, so I highly doubt it's nvidia's fault per se. And I can't even find any other games with this issue.

    The whole "64-bit" theory is just lol. You have 64bit cpu and windows 7/10 64bit and you are able to run 32 bit software... LO better finally look into this and say something because. If you guys wait for the engine update  so this problem disappear, you are going to have a bad time - it's not coming any time soon.

  22. Posted · Edited by Sayori

    38 minutes ago, Uke said:

    I'm not even disappointed. At this point I've gotten used to watching you fail at everything.

     

    Edit:

    You can downvote me but sadly it doesn't change the facts.

    What do you expect ? We live in a post-truth world.

    And there's a guy saying that there are 50-60 people in so it's not a fail? Yeah ? And how many people are trying to get in?

    This beta wasn't decided yesterday, had plenty of time to prepare including backup plan but here we are again - convincing me that UE will be a giant flop.

    What I'm supposed to do? Enter my login credentials every few minutes? And this is the result of my 3 attempts to get in social

     

    W846UcZ.png

     

  24. Posted

    30 minutes ago, xXD4v1dXx said:

    Multiple people have already elaborated, just look through the replies again 

    Yes and none of them was LO's staff. I don't want to play guessing games. The blog page doesn't explain it clearly, it seems like overly complicated system, things could be much simpler. But I'm sure this is going to benefit new players soooooooooo much ...because they read blog pages and forums /s

×
×
  • Create New...