Jump to content
Forum rules

cheater

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    250

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cheater

  1. Posted

    On 6/4/2019 at 7:57 PM, Hexerin said:

    I'm pretty sure that's an almost universal wish. Tracers added a lot to gameplay. Also, I share that as the one thing I would wish return. That being said, tracers existed in the early days of the game's relaunch under GamersFirst. They removed them because "performance issues" or some such nonsense.

    I don't think I'll ever really understand why people care about this. If you mod your gun, its muzzle flash is now blue. However, since modding your gun is mandatory progression, everyone's gun has blue muzzle flashes. There's nothing unique or interesting about the mechanic.

    They never removed tracers due to performance issues, They just broke them one day and never bothered to fix it

  3. Posted

    1 minute ago, Fortune Runner said:

    So many of you wanted new content updates as soon as possible to the point of even rushing Little Orbit and were very vocal about this.

    And Little Orbit , in their kindness ,  tried to hurry up because of how many of you were restless and flat out griping.

    Now EAC is being difficult and causign a delay , and all you do is talk bad about Little Orbit for doing what you were demanding - for Little Orbit to rush out new content - SMH SLL

    No one asked for the Riot mode to start with, Matt said that they started working on it May last year (As soon as they bought the game) without asking the community what they really want, instead of that, we will just release a BR mode into a 600 pop server so they cant have a full mission district running 😄

    • Like 2

  6. Posted

    Just now, Sayori said:

    auth issues are not "last second issues". this is something that should have been found days before, not doing tests right before release. No they don't look unprofessional, THEY ARE unprofessional.

    This is just another example. I get it they are small company without any experience with "big" online games but at this point this is just a meme.

    REAL

  8. Posted

    No one asked for this game mode to begin with, You guys decided on your own without asking the community what it wants, What a better idea there is than adding a Battleroyale game mode to Citadel ( 600 pop) so the community can split and we will never have a full mission district, This game mode is what will kill this game, not talking about all the wasted promises about engine tests or screenshots.

    • Like 9

  10. Posted

    I got a question, What company tests one of their biggest updates right before releasing it? At this point you guys just make yourself look unprofessional as hell, you had only 2 OTW tests, you guys changed a lot after the last delayed OTW test and you guys didnt think to test it again, but test it the same night you guys are going to release it? joke of a company

  12. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Similarities said:

    The biggest issue in my experience is not that BE is lacking in solidity, but rather, Little Orbit's implementation of the anti-cheat is poor at best and awful at worst. Changing to EAC will not fix the fundamental issue which is that the development team has shown that they're inexperienced in actually implementing their anti-cheat solution, not that the anti-cheat solution itself is poor. @MattScott it is in my opinion that you contract an external security analyst to ensure your implementation of this is not poor like your BattlEye implementation was. We spoke about this in DMs, you know I'm always right at the door. 😉

    I still don't understand how anyone truly believes that the engine is such a major part of anti-cheating capabilities. The "full-support" you speak of is nothing more than Little Orbit actually implementing their anti-cheat properly. The engine has nothing to do with it, whether it's aged or not. The Source Engine that runs Apex is 15 years old now and Apex is still able to keep up decently well.

    u buy ur shit anyways so u got no idea on whats going on with anti cheat compatibility 

    • Thanks 4

  15. Posted

    33 minutes ago, TheSxW said:

    it occurs like an configuration fault at beginning after few days "controller" got fucked up heavly and connection was shutted down almost completly - the best thing is that all hardware was brand new ...

    if ur HDD dies in pc u will not even notice it untill u will have to access an hdd data directly - it happends to me at work - windows works like always but i cant get into drive files (but mozilla works fine loading staff from internet all was saved in RAM (strangely) after restart it completly dies - it was an disk head fault

    what

  16. Posted

    7 minutes ago, MattScott said:

    Hi all,

     

    Lixil has updated her original post.

     

     

    We are waiting on replacement hardware, but we should be able to do some maintenance tomorrow (5/6) to fix the issue.

     

    Thanks,

    Matt

    Thats funny, as someone who worked as Sys admin once in their life, I know that the first thing you do when you have an issue that happens more than once, is that you check your hardware, it really took you guys 5 days to find that out? great level of work

    • Like 1

  22. Posted

    Server MS constantly between 34 - 45 causing instability, stutters and client MS to go up. 

    at this point it doesnt even seem like a ddos, its just your "upgrade" and "new netcode" that is causing this, good shit! 😄

  25. Posted

    50 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:

    We just work here my dude... Or rather, we just volunteer here. 

    We aren't in charge of testing. 

     

     

    I can tell, every single patch came out, it had a game breaking bug in it, old SPCT used to have play tests to test patches and other stuff, looks like you dont have them due to all the bugs, so what do you even do as a SPCT?

×
×
  • Create New...