Jump to content
Forum rules

Fubukigata

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    93

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fubukigata

  2. Posted · Edited by Fubukigata

    6 hours ago, Kewlin said:

    In other words. . .

     

    Rank

     

    has

     

    no

     

    place

     

    in

     

    matchmaking.

     

    So yes, I 100% believe rank 9 players should be able to be matched against rank 255s, and I believe that's a no-brainer for more people who've been around for a while.

     

    I respect your opinion about it but APB never been designed for competition so how matching a new player vs a veteran one who knows everything about the game, and the maps would be fair in a match ?

     

    6 hours ago, Kewlin said:

    I wasn't trolling though. . . it was a light-hearted joke thread. Not all jokes are trolling.

     

    I'm going to hope for the best and assume you're not a native English speaker, but playful fighting is a very accepted form of joking in most of the English speaking world.

     

    No i'am not a native English speaker indeed but i guess you got all i've pointed out .

    You are not Kewl dude :x

    Or even more jokes, you're writing too much like a Kewlin Jacket missing out the target rather than hiting the point here.

     

     

  3. Posted · Edited by Fubukigata

    Even trolling or without the context, git gud scrub isn't suppose to be nice .

     

    Pointing out that Threat isn't enought to handle a Matchmaking is fair than enought, cause it's bring a deeper way to thing about it.

     

    ps : it's already being discuss on previous topics.
    exemple : Phasing , adding an estimate timmer for the queue.

     

    Nah you can't be real writing a R9 player facing a R255 is fine.

     

    Dethreaters are the people called for doing it on purpose to farm new players.

    A report tool would add more works to the little Admin staff.

    TL:DR The whole system has to be re-think

     

    + Matt reading posts where his quotted like tonight, so it's not "kinda' a dead horse at this point."

     

  4. Posted · Edited by Fubukigata

    I'am not sure you took the time to ask yourself X20 times , cause it's look like you forget to point out thoses kinda things aren't you ?

     

    Quote

     

    Kewlin replied to ch4ncer's topic in Off-Topic Section

    Please tell me this is aimed at me: I love random attacks on my character made for no reason. I literally said I liked the thread. I probably have hundreds of posts on pointless threads that I've been accused of using to up my post count. Anyways, I win, you lose, git gud scrub.

     

     

    21 minutes ago, Kewlin said:

    Anyhoo, did you actually have anything to say against my points about rank matchmaking being bad, or did you just want to make erroneous claims that all of my 8219 posts are worthless?

    I just did , pointed out that MMR can't be relied on threat only

     

    On 11/4/2018 at 5:08 AM, Kewlin said:

    Yes I know the gold district is empty. I just don't understand why all the gold players show up in the silver district. It's not that I got a thing against gold players but there are quite a few that seem to be there just to get easy kills or just to sabotage a mission when your paired with them.

     

    Gold district got deserted cause it was infested of cheaters according to people.

    Since there it was empty and only used for arranged edgy matched for egos showtime.

     

    21 minutes ago, Kewlin said:

    The majority of my posts actually have not been sarcastic replies, and my reply to you wasn't sarcastic either. (In fact I'm having trouble finding what part of it you read as sarcastic.

    (Please don't pull out the "oh but mah gear" argument, I've fucked people up plenty of times with just a stock STAR, frags, an FBW, and Field Supplier.)

     

     

    Again i'am not gonna browse your 8220 entries but the few i've readed doesn't show you as someone constructive.

     

    With that being said, let's move on the topic tho or do you have anything else to add about my Matchmaking and Threat entries ?

     

  5. Posted

    15 minutes ago, Kewlin said:

     

    I don't understand why people think rank based matchmaking would help anything, it literally has no correlation to skill. Changing to rank based matchmaking just entirely fucks over high ranked silvers and bronzes and gives dethreaters an easier time because they just need to make a new account and they instantly are matched with new players. (Please don't pull out the "oh but mah gear" argument, I've fucked people up plenty of times with just a stock STAR, frags, an FBW, and Field Supplier.)

     

    MMR formulas in the majorities of games lead to this :  EXP + SKILL + Waiting timmer -> Match found.

     

    Segregating the disctrict by THREAT only, was a thing back in 2010 technologies restriction sure.
    But it's also leaded the game into a dead END if you look arround you with all being said on this topic previously or on others.

     

    I'am sure you gonna have some new stuff to bring on the table with your 8219 thread sarcastics replies.

     

    Now tell me , what have you been able to bring ahead that made the game better with all those entries.

    And i'am not even comming in a toxic way my dude.

     

    Like come on, be for real, step back about it and be sure to ask youself  X20 times before replying again.

     

  6. Posted

    Hello there o/

     

    1 hour ago, Kewlin said:

     

    I'm pretty sure not anything is better, lol. 

     

    @Kewlin
    APB Matchmaking is one of the biggest issue since the release and yes it has to be changed mainly by rank (experience) and not by threat.

     

    8 minutes ago, Haganu said:

    Anything is better than what we have right now until the game has proper systems. That includes having no threat-based matchmaking at all.

    It's absolute folly to think differently when you've seen the result of the current system with your own eyes for half a goddamn decade.

    @Haganu

    I read that Matt closed the OTW for some internal tests, so yeah i hope seeying a 3.5 realease sooner than expected at some point.
     

     

     

    @MattScott
    It does not need any release engine to talk and status about those huges game issues that had be pointed and reviewed over years right ?

     

     

  15. Posted · Edited by Fubukigata
    more details

    Finally a CEO with more than 30 iq, seriously thank you @MattScott

     

    How about implenting a CRISP staff to apply sanctions about trash talking and hackusating ? It's been toxic over 8 years :x

     

    "quoting the whole thing"

     

    Quote

    CRISP Community Moderation

    Whether in missions or hanging around the Social District, APB is at its core driven by constant and positive social interaction between each of the players. Each day our team strives to create an inviting atmosphere so you will not only feel welcomed among other APB players, but also invite your friends to join you here. Still, we realize that our small GM staff is not always able to properly address all the harassment, scamming, and offensive language that takes place and much more needs to be done. So over the next couple months, we are introducing two major initiatives that will both tackle this toxic behavior head on while bringing the next generation of players into APB.

    First, we are nearing completion on integrating a sophisticated community moderation solution called CRISP Thinking into APB. CRISP works seamlessly in the background to automatically detect and moderate toxic players anywhere in the game, then take instant action as necessary. Unlike conventional filtering systems, CRISP is able to look beyond 'bad' word usage and examine the context of entire phrases. Harassment, hateful speech, and even scam attempts can be detected and acted upon in real-time while keeping positive players protected. We are aiming to introduce CRISP this Summer.

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...