TheOppositePolarBear
-
Content Count
380 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by TheOppositePolarBear
-
-
-
4 hours ago, RCooper said:Lo que yo supongo que estan haciendo es atraer primero a los antiguos jugadores con la mejora de la engine para así aumentar la player base, a parte de hacer el juego más atractivo en todos los sentidos y ya cuando el juego está más estable hacer una campaña para atraer a nuevos jugadores ya que como tú dices el tutorial esta pero debería ser más intuitivo
Aún así el matchmaking debía haber sido prioridad maxima en mi opinión ya que hay jugadores que no les importa mucho la mejora de la engine pero que juegan y les parten el culo si mejorarán el matchmaking esto no les pasaría tanto
....... sigh
lee lo que puse, es bueno leer lo que ya se hablo antes de opinar.
3 hours ago, NekoSensei said:Is there a rule that says "American game, speak American"? Unless a moderator says it, what you said is not valid. Or should I say "Spanish post, speak Spanish"?, makes nosense, right?
If he's not able to speak english that shouldn't stop him to text in his main language.
i mean... i can translate if you guys want, he is just complaining about the matchmaking, tutorial and learning curve tho
32 minutes ago, ch4ncer said:only if you're a cuck too, and dont jump anyone who looks you bad in the eye, like I do, I'm so mean I fuсk like a stuck bull and the rims of my bald eagle, firebreathing american V8 muslce car are made out of alloy consisting of teenage pussу, testosterone and big dicks. Get at me.
32 minutes ago, BXNNXD said:estoy poopin
its cagando
that has been your daily knowledge nugget
-
57 minutes ago, Xandra94 said:y el tutorial?,
la curva de aprendizaje?el matchmaking no va a solucionar los menos de 860 jugadores que hay en el juego actualmente
iluminame con tu sabiduria
eh? por que preguntas esas cosas? pensas que intento desacreditar todo tu post?
osea que solo por atacar uno de tus puntos tengo que estar 100% en contra tuyo? no puedo estar en contra de uno de tus puntos, y a favor de otros?
nisiquiera estoy acatando el punto de que el matchmaking sea malo, solo te informaba de que hay cosas haciendose.
o necesitas que te diga explicitamente "oh zi tyenez rason"?
-
en caso de que no sepas lo que esta pasando, LO ya dijo que van a trabajar en el matchmaking luego de actualizar el motor grafico.
luego de la actualizacion, va a ser posible hacer fasing entre distritos, el matchmaking va a tener mas jugadores con los cuales trabajar.
nisiquiera con un distrito lleno llegas a la cantidad de jugadores que hacen falta para hacer partidas justas.
-
26 minutes ago, FENGPENG said:snip
all these graphic updates would be really "nice to have"s, but i doubt we will ever get it. that kind of stuff is more expensive than you think.
on top of that
27 minutes ago, FENGPENG said:- when a mission starts, an animation of a contact should pop out on screen and says what to do.
Also when you get opponents.- A sound should be played in the background when you hitting a particular area who says, whos
area you're stepping into (only when you step into a enemy unity)those would get annoying over time, specially if the animation beacomes a cutscene that takes the whole screen, wich would lead to some... less than optimal situations. an option to NOT have them would be needed
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:You're like a month late.
i think im at least 3 months late but im not sure
-
just doing my part, you know
for "standing up for independent content creators against mass companies" - /u/iateyourdoglol
hitthatsubscribebutton
-
48 minutes ago, Adawon said:In case if you don't know, 2,482 > 603, which means 603 is a minority. The majority who left the game didn't leave because the game needs polishing, but because the game needs a lot of change. That's the point of the whole topic.
and how does that proves your point?
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:Little Orbit is ignoring the much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change, and would argue that most of the players who quit are just like me.
nobody denies APB's population is in decline. but YOU said LO is ignoring this "large audience" who is "bugged by the mechanics that you think needs to change" and told us to "read the reviews".
i read the reviews, find that nobody is complaining about the mechanics you wanted to change, and that LO is not ignoring the audience thats leaving, and actually, they are addressing the biggest complains.
so your steamchart doesnt contradicts my point nor proves yours, and we're still lacking proof of your-own-claim
so, once again, im still waiting for the proof of your-own-claim that discredits my proof...i mean, YOUR proof, you told us to go read steam reviews.
-
2
-
-
11 minutes ago, Adawon said:*thinks thats a rebuttal*
oh wait, thats not a rebuttal.
still waiting on proof on your own claims:
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:Little Orbit is ignoring the much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change
-
21 hours ago, Goldtiger said:And this reply as well:
From someone who is also attacking OP by being a smartass and insinuating that OP is just another "kiddo" who thinks that they can never be wrong.
If you actually take the time to read OP's post, it's clear that they're only trying to suggest to Little Orbit not to listen only to the veteran players, but to listen also mainly to the ones who left. I felt like @ing these people in this reply would be too much like an attack, but this is just simple confirmation that a lot of veteran players in this community are entitled and are completely against major change in this game. Like it or not, polishing this game and adding new content will NOT bring this game out of the dying state. I'm so sick of people in this community attacking people for even suggesting that LO changes something about the core game mechanics.
To new players, the base game can be very unsatisfactory; it definitely needs change. I got my friend to download and try out APB, and although he was trying his hardest to enjoy the game, he found it both frustrating and unfun. Not only was he getting killed by sweaty players who either dethreated to play against him or was simply cucked by the matchmaking itself, he didn't find many of the game mechanics fun or interesting and he hasn't touched the game since. (this was a month after LO went through their first major unban wave back when they first took control of the game). Since then, nothing has changed that makes him want to come back and same with my older friends (and brother) who played the game back then YEARS ago.
lol, this acutally made me chuckle.
yeah, lets totally forget that i actually went to where OP told me all these "unaddressed" complains were, and all i found were eather P2W complains (we both know the real problem here, matchmaking, paid weapons cant even hold a candle to NTEC, OCA and HVR), and complains about stuff LO is already addressing (INCLUDING MATCHMAKING)
so please, tell me, where are all these, in OP's words, "the much larger audience, which is the players who left. [...] getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change" because all i see from that audience of players who left, are complains about problems that are being addressed.
<Sarcasm>
because yeah, im pretty sure they left because LO still havent implemented what the greatest game designer ever, saviour of APB, messiah of gaming, overlord and great leader @Adawon, suggested. after all, in APBlations 4:20, he said
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:Little Orbit is ignoring the much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change
see? he says "I think needs to change", because he is the greatest designer ever, and nobody would have ever left if this game if LO would have implemented his idea. people didnt left because of
-horrible matchmaking
-horrendous lag
-plain stupid performance on today's hardware
-lack of new content
-toxic smurf (dethreaters) community
-trolls
-ridiculous microtransaction pricing
-cheaters/hackers and a lack of a proper, working anticheat measure
-bugs
-low player count
-not being able to rank contacts because of waterfront
no no no no no no no, they left because they didnt liked pedestrian's IA.
</Sarcasm>
oh, and while im talking about it, @Adawon , im still waiting for proof that this:
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change
exists.
11 hours ago, Adawon said:Polarbear himself admitted that there are few legit reviews, which supports my point. So stop using that for your argument because it doesn't support your argument by any means.
ok, maybe using the word "legit" for those reviews that somewhat supported your point (like...2 or 3 out of 40) was a poor choise of words, most people complained about stuff thats already being addressed, and while i went to the places YOU TOLD US to look for this:
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change
and bought back proof of that audicence is unexistant (no review suggesting what YOU suggested), and that LO is not ignoring the most voiced complains of the people that left, you keep going on and on and on and on about your "thoughts" without any actual hard proof and even bringing stuff to the table that completely discredits your point.
so, when your baised brain stops reading only what you want, and twisting the proof to fit your point of view instead of the other way arround, i would LOVE to see the proof that this
On 2/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, Adawon said:much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change
actually exists, and dont come here saying "dUUuh, g0To st33m r3V13zzzz", i already did, nothing that helps your cause is to be found there.
On 2/10/2019 at 10:00 PM, Fortune Runner said:Adawon seriously can you give it a rest with the attitude?
Your ideas were terrible and making a thread just to slander Little Orbit is only annoying the rest of us here.
You said Little Orbit is only polishing? Since when is a major Engine Upgrade just polishing? really?????
Then you even started up on TheOppositePolarBear for actually going over reviews that prove the ones giving bad reviews (most likely who quit) were mostly not even suggesting any fixes to APB at all.
why argue with someone who has no real clue and only demands selfish things? too many people said no and showed good reasons why.
awwww, he took the work of writing my complete name, upper casing and all
you didnt have to, you can just call me polarbear like Bxnnxd does, i mean, yes, ->someone<- might get annoyed if people starts linking "polarbear" to me, but we can say he is just too....unaware of the situation
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, Kewlin said:snip
they could have just make the 3D model with a 9mm mag so it would fit the SMG criteria, its not like things like the MPX are not a thing (you know, guns whose magwell are a noticiable bigger than the magazine itself).
probably carbine is not the best name because of the ACES and the 1922... or is it?
doesnt people call things like the Cx4 a "carbine"?
so probably we can fit those 2 as "carbine"... or at least the ACES.
btw, i would also add the manic into this... lets call it "sub-rifle" category.
about the cobra, i have never used it so i dont really know how it plays. same with the ISSR, i tried the dog ear but people told me all ISSR plays diferently so i dont know anymore.
about the LCR, i thought it already was a marksman rifle. i've allways seen it as such.
but yeah, i think these guns plays so diferently they deserve another category.
-
1 minute ago, Adawon said:I already stated it's not about veterans specifically. And you're the one who marked about 40 reviews as non-legit. But I see you like to keep talking.
i didnt marked 40 reviews as non legit, but i see you dont like to read proof
i marked how the problems most people who stops playing apb and writes steam reviews complains about, are being addressed by LO.
start reading, it wont hurt you.
-
1 hour ago, Kewlin said:Are you French?
Also, no, at least not by the name "carbine." Let's not forget that at least half of the assault rifles in APB are carbines, E.G. the STAR, N-TEC, S1-FA, etc.. I'll agree that it's a category that in-practice exists in APB, which many SMGs and assault rifles fall into, but IDK if it's necessary or practical to officially introduce it as a category.
aw mon chéri, im not french
i mean, considering we have this thing as an "SMG":
^clarely a carabine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daewoo_Precision_Industries_K1
i think judging the gun by its look is out of the window already
-
aaaaah
what ish thish i shee? a non- western spy cheeki breeki weslav camarade came to pay a vishit, i shee
dont worry camarade weslav, this western developers are working in your problem as we sheak, you shee, LO ish hard at work, they promish'd to deliver not jusht some new mishions, no no, but a whole new game mode, you can read aaaaalll about that, in the last blog post, aha!
in the meanwhile, you can go squat home and enjoy some chebureki with kvass
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, ɱɑƫƫʂϗᎧɨɨ™ said:Just don't spam the RMB too much otherwise it will jam then you might as well just give up using it in that remark, But overall very simple gun to use once gotten the hang of.
i dont think he was looking for advice on how to use the oscar....
6 hours ago, MartisLTU said:Yeah .. seems i mixed up little bit (sorry and thanks), but still it stands clear that semi weapons have way slower fire rate compare to full-auto. And in APB semi weapons ussers can shoot as fast as full auto .. it bugs me tbh.
just a footnote to all what people already said about the diference between auto and semi auto:
both semi autos, bumpstock on the left one.
also, more bumpstock
2 hours ago, VickyFox said:Personally if I could wave a magic wand and change the guns inventory classifications, I'd have Assault Rifles and Rifles changed into: Automatic Rifles, Semi Auto Rifles and Marksman Rifles.
I Just cannot understand why some carbines that shoot faster than fully automatic rifles were counting towards Markman role when you don't use Marksmanship!
Sorry for that tangent, It was always a anomaly that was a little bit of a pet peeve of mine.
Back on topic, It does beg the question of where's the OCSAR's place is meant to be in APB when it hasn't got many flaws.
The Ntec is a good all-rounder but It's range and accuracy are reasonable, With the OCSAR it just doesn't feel quite right without a balanced level of weaknesses.
For a larger rifle with a longer barrel, one would of thought it would be medium to long range but yet it still a bit too comfortable in close range with hipfiring.
1) can i add "carabines" to the classifications? and no, i dont mean it as in "SR-15 carabine" sense, i mean it in the "rifle, but shorter than a rifle so you can use it in more short range situations" sense. i do feel like guns like the ATAC and the RAPTOR doesnt really fit next to the STAR and the NTEC and could use their own classification "between rifle and SMG", thus, carabine.
2) i *think* the idea of calling the oscar/SR15 a "marksman rifle" comes from the idea that, in a high mobility team where everybody is using PMG, OCA and shotguns, a player with a SR-15/OSCAR works as a high movility "marksman" (in the sense that, he has longer range and accuracy) for that team (if they aremoving toghether)
2 hours ago, Nanometic said:There is no point to use a carbine when the oscar exists, change my mind.
i like SIG guns ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
7 hours ago, Adawon said:Thanks for supporting my point.
I never said that all the reviews are legit, so, sorry to tell you that you wasted a lot of your time.
nu-uh! when confronted with:
10 hours ago, AsgerLund said:Try to give an example of what made people leave, that LO is ignoring or refusing to change.
YOU replied:
10 hours ago, Adawon said:Look up youtube reviews of the game, non-reccomending reviews on steam and suggestions forum. I have made suggestions in the past, check my profile to get to them.
The only core changing suggestion of these is the first one, the rest are clearly polishing and overhauling. If you are looking to other core change suggestions from me, there's the one about car glass, the one about car tires and the one about throwing grenades on drive-by.
so i did, i went to steam reviews, and i bought back proof that debunks your point, proof that the most voiced complains by the players that left are being addressed.
in the meanwhile, you have bought NOTHING to prove that there are 100's of players not being listened, all you said was "oh, i suggested this, and that, and its not implemented".
well, guess what? you're only one person, you're not 100's of players, and my point stands as proof of the existance of your bias and a personal echo chamber inside your head.
but yeah, keep flagging anybody who disagrees with you as a "game veterans who like the game as it is and only think it needs polishing and more content" and any review thats not about changeing/adding a core game mechanic as "non-legit", you do you i guess.
-
4
-
-
3 hours ago, Adawon said:Little Orbit's CEO always talks about listening to the players and improving connection between players and developers in almost every occasion, which is very good, but at the same time, Little Orbit is ignoring the much larger audience, which is the players who left. Being one of them to leave in 2015 (came back last year hoping little orbit will bring change), I was, and still, getting bugged by game mechanics that I think need to change, and would argue that most of the players who quit are just like me. What I've seen from Little Orbit so far is just the will to polish the game and add more content, not change core mechanics, which is very disappointing. Little Orbit is only listening to the game veterans who like the game as it is and only think it needs polishing and more content, these people dominate the forums and are there to oppose any topics on the Suggestions Forum that suggest changing core gameplay or mechanics, making it appear that everyone oppose those changes, while a greater number of people are to support changes (including almost all my game friends, whether the ones who quit or the ones who are still playing), but most of them have already left the game, while the portion of players who are still playing don't have the courage to suggest something that forums veterans will dislike and oppose. In conclusion, I don't think sticking to the current small player base and only polishing the game is going to increase the number of players, but listening to people who want change and who left the game will. So please, Little Orbit, consider checking mechanics-changing suggestions (which are bombed with dislikes and opposing replies, like the ones I've written) and address the reviews who concluded low ratings for the game, whether written or in videos.
ITT: "LO didnt apply the changes I, me, the greatest videogame designer ever existed, -suggested- (aka: i ORDER them to do), thus, they are not listening to US! the MAYORITY! THE 99%!"
and remember kiddos that play apb: I AM NEVER - EVER WRONG, how could i be? nah, its ALL OF YOU the ones on the wrong.
3 hours ago, Adawon said:Look up youtube reviews of the game, non-reccomending reviews on steam and suggestions forum
ok, lets do it
-choose english, order by helpfulness, checks only negative reviews
here we go:
1st negative review: complains about no servers in south america;
-meh- complain, considering I play from south america without problems, but i can see how some people can feel bad playing with 180ms latency. still, its not so much of a game design choise but a financial choise, if south american servers are not viable, they are simply not viable
2nd review: complains about repetitiveness in missions, low threats facing golds with "better gear".
another -meh- complain. i would totally accept it, if it werent because games like CSGO are always the same in competitive, and its pretty darn alive and well. competitive games dont really need to be that varied. low threats facing golds is something LO said they are going to adress with distirct fasing after the engine upgrade, and golds with "better gear"... we have already talking a lot about it, but in short: any good player can perform really good with any free gun with no mods, even a STAR. i can understand where he is comming from tho.
3rd review: just not helpful at all. no real reason given for a bad review.
4th review: complains about P2W, lag, trolling players, "meat shields" (lol), low map variety and ARMAs pricing
lag, trolls, map variety and ARMAs pricing are problems LO already said they are working on. we have already discussed a lot in this forums about the P2W aspect of the game, but tl;dr: its not as pay to win as most people think, and no, the paid guns are not an advantage when you get the NTEC,OCA and NHVR for free.
the meatshield... lol, in more than 5 years playing this game i have never seen that.
5th reviews: complains about cheaters and ARMAs pricing
LO already said they are working on that.
6th review: complains about dated graphics and matchmaking.
LO already said they are working on matchmaking and dated graphics... well, guess what? apb is not a 2019 game.
7th review: complains about P2W.
.... do i really need to say anything about it? git gud.
8th review: complains about P2W and the toxic community (and highlights Spanked 2 ez and their chat messenges)
P2W, already addressed it, toxic community, welcome to the internet.
9th review: complains about the tutorial
FINALLY! a legit review. i hope LO does something about it, not sure if they said anything about it.
10th review: complains about matchmaking, P2W, bad tutorial.
no need to say anything about this.
11th,12th,13th, review: complains about P2W
14th review: no real reason given for bad review
15th review: complains about not being able to jump snipe
16th review: complains about cheaters/hackers
17th review: complains about high system requirements.
already addressed by LO with the 32 to 64b engine upgrade, i think
18th review: complains about devs being rude (im going to guess its about G1), systems stuff, and P2W.
19th review:complains about P2W
20th,21th,22th review: no real reason given for bad review
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> yo OP, at this point im starting to wonder where are all these un-addressed complains and suggestions to change on game mechanics that you were talking about, but lets continue
23th review: complains about P2W, devs "not caring", no new content, no balance and bugs.
i think i dont need to say anything about the devs "not caring"; if anything, LO havent showed us yet that they -dont care- at all. all the other stuff has been already said to be being work on, by the devs that "dont care".
24th review: no real reason given for the bad review
25th review: complains about P2W
26th review: complains about bugs
27th review: complains about P2W
28th review: complains about... being less than gta?
29th review: complains about the community
30th review:no real reason given for bad review
31th review: complains about bugs and errors
32th review: no real reason given for bad reveiw
33th review: complains about performance and being dated
34th review: complains about player movement and dated graphics.
as a note, no suggestions about how to improve the player's movement was given.
35th review: complains about the threat system, cardet, bugs, "RNG based mechanics" (lol?), the old G1, DDoS, balance.
1, 3,7: being addressed, 6:i hope it can be addressed at all, 2:you can argue that its a bad game mechanic, or not, its not hard to scape from a cardet if you're ready for it (should be), 5: is not any more, 4: not even i know what he was talking about.
36th reivew: complains about low player count, dethreating, the forum community.
well, its not like LO enjoys having a low populated game, all they are doing are a big address to the low population. dethreating, LO already said they will address it with fasing, the forum community, is NOT a game mechanic and its not for dicuss on this thread.
37th review: complains about matchmaking and dethreating
38th review: complains about the community, low player count, matchmaking, learning curve, contacts being in empty districts.
the contacts being in an empty district and learning curve can be discussed, but no suggestion was given.
39th review: complains about matchmaking, lag, bugs, car handling
once again, no suggestion about better car handling given. cars doesnt feel good in apb because of server sided driving, wich was found to be the best option for a game like this, probably.
40 review: complains about P2W.
oh man, look at ALL THAT STUFF that people is complaining about and LO is not addressing... oh wait, there was like... only 2 or 3 reviews complaining about legit stuff thats not being addressed.
like, really, op, how many more steam reviews are you going to make me read?
-
6
-
4
-
-
i got a sitting duck and 1.5M
...
...
...
time to start the APB's october revolution! ... in like 8 months or so
I DEMAND LO TO TAKE THE ITEMS OF THOSE WHO HAS MORE THAN THEY NEED AND TO GIVE ME A URSUS!
...
...
...
/s, just in case someone actually takes this seriously, also, r/unexpectedpolitics
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, TzickyT said:well i prefer something like metabans
i dont know what metabans is, but from what i could gather in a 3 minutes search, its eather:
A) a database of players shared by some server's admins, wich would not work because this is not community-server game.
or
B) a public witchhunt list of people accused of cheating, wich one - would have ALL players in the database because thats how APB community rolls, and two - ITS THE EXACT THING LO IS TRYING TO STOP, THUS, WHY THEY STOPPED BROADCASTING THE BANS.
9 minutes ago, TzickyT said:i feel like this game has something to do with fame or creating fame. i do say all the good players may have there stats shown. i also do say banned people shoud not be on the shown list and i know LO is trying to avoid toxic behaviour.
and thats how the "cheater check squad" was born, a group of players that would check everyday the list, hoping to see the player they reported 2 weeks ago dissapear from it (thus, "it got banned"). and the day a -good- player gets banned? the toxic behaviour LO is trying to stop by stopping the ban broadcasts will be here once again.
so, once again - that list would also go against what LO has been doing this far.
-----------------------------------------
by the way you presented your idea:
5 hours ago, TzickyT said:isn't than something like a stats website for apb players better where people can see their stats and when the person banned there stats are removed
it looks like you want "FFBANS broadcast, but not FFBANS broadcast, because that got canned by LO, but a lowkey FFBANS broadcast, so i can search everyday for that player i reported 3 weeks ago and see if he got banned because of Ju5t1C33333333!!!!!!!!", wich goes against what LO has been doing.
if you want a webpage to show stats, thats kinda ok (just kinda - it also sparks all kind of toxic behaviour but i guess thats normal competitive gaming behaviour), once you give any kind of tip on who got banned, you can bet people is going to get as many info as they can out of that simple tip.
-
1 minute ago, BXNNXD said:even that is too much imo
either the number is too high and everyone runs around hackusating because the game is “infested with cheaters” or the number is too low and everyone runs around hackusating because “orbit is letting cheaters roam free”
^
...mods will be angry if i just comment an arrow, right?
...
...
fixed -
4 hours ago, TzickyT said:i never used any stuff that messed with my game so why do you need a crosshair ?
this just feels like every bullet goes straight anyway ...
ok i can maybe exagurate that i m against any use of anything outside the game only.
i see a lot of people updating there config files and a lot use the advanced launcher.
hey where is the smoke? i ask.
i changed it becous my pc is like a patato. the streamer says.
"i look to there computer spects" runs a computer thats better than mine with a 2080 graphic card ...
personaly i would say ban advanced launcher but than a lot people wil not be happy so i am ok with that but i would suggest to remove that when 3.5 comes out.
other thing i would say. ban peopel who messing with config files. sure do it on a single player game but why on multiplayer. becous its possible. becous its an easy advantage.
or make sure that the config file gets redownloaded every time u start up the game. its a small file so the download wil not be a problem unless that player has a download limit of 1MB ( what i kindly don't beleve at all)
The game had a ton of cheaters banned becous of systems. just make a server for those hackers. let them play on there hacked account. but seperate them from playing on normal servers.
if a person hacked on a game they can play against hackers anyway in my oppinion. wil give the company money probebly becous now the game just has to less people anyway.
ideal situations are nice to look for solutions, arent they?
"lets just remove this thing i dont like - it doesnt matter if the bad PR will make the playerbase drop even further, we... we can spare them, ok? apb has like... what? 600 players in average playing at all times?... look man, as long as there are 4 players, we can play, ok?"
45 minutes ago, TzickyT said:isn't than something like a stats website for apb players better where people can see their stats and when the person banned there stats are removed
so, what you want is a low-key FF, "oh look, its -not a webpage to look for banned names- , no no, its a -stats webpage- that, indirectly -allows you to look for banned names-"
aka: what LO is trying to avoid at all costs.
do you really, REALLY, REALL-LI-TY-REALLY -MAGNAABSOLUTELY- N3333333333333333333333D! to get the names of the banned players? wont a simple "we banned X ammount of players" like in most games that shows that kind of stuff, be enough?
-
3 hours ago, Havana said:Can we get rid of the Start up screen that shows the districts and just freaking have the list of servers?
I bet you would hate that! Then you would stop getting those poor Bronzes and Just turned Silvers actually in the Silver district.
Who tells them they should be playing in Bronze?
NONE OF YOU!
actually, i've been doing that for like 2 or 3 years already.
-
idk, having to play a mission while paying attention to the newbie... i could never make it work this far.
can we get an spectator mode instead? i would actually love to log in just to watch newbies play and give advice.
-
16 hours ago, Thial said:If you don't cheat you have nothing to be worried about. I've been hackusated countless times since 2014 and I never got falsely banned.
i mean.... who doesnt? for many players reporting whoever killed them is almost muscle memory already.
lets remember the guy that reported a player for running him over with a car, for example.
Armas Update Feedback
in General Discussion Archive
Posted · Edited by TheOppositePolarBear
this thread is by far the best one i have ever seen, it has everything a great thread needs XD im not even being sarcastic over here! anyways, lets begin:
oh! watchout guys! we have a Bad A- Engineer over here! (BAE)
can i call you bae? imma call you bae
btw, what up with your writing? are you compensating for something? i mean, look at the size of that... font
for real tho, im cringy but you take the cake and all the honors.
anyways, im going to rephrase what cookie said, ehem:
"you have no control over wich value of the chain of the pseudo-random numbers generated buy whatever algorith APB's function uses , is produced at the moment of you opening your box, specially without knowing wich algorith apb uses or wich seed it used"
...but lets be honest over here, its APB's code, pretty sure it just uses whatever rand() function the language have and it seeds using the clock every time it needs a new number.
so... random is random.
but i understand you, you dont want to discuss whats random and whats not, you want to discuss how the chance of getting a legendary was reduced, but once again, its kind of... hard to understand you when you write like a first grader on ketamine
too bad you arent as pasionate for english as you're for engineering (IF you really are an engineer, but considering how cringy and awkward your writing is, you probably are)
just kidding! you would be the 1st engineer i meet who cant hold a decent discussion without having to compensate for his lack of substance by calling people "ignorants" "uneducated" and other insults, trying to feel superior than the rest.
i guess you're not an engineer, just because a cringy guy throwing random tantrums in the internet, insulting people instead of trying to discuss their points, and later shielding himself behind a "I am a passionate person and so many times got from the moment I happen to be wrong with some people" would be a complete shame for the engineering profession. oops! i guess you're not pasionate enough to try to put some dignity in the title of "engineer".
you kind of behave like a 9 year old tho... mmm... #subscribetopewdiepie ;D
what are you going to say? that im"uneducated" or "ignorant" because i decided to make a post about you? such a bad patootie, now try to have a normal discussion beafore throwing random insults and tantrums
that i can "call you" with all my "boyfriends"? wow, such a great insult... for a 9 year old kid, come on, is that everything you have? if you're going to be disrespectful, at least try.
that im not part of this discussion? you're in a public forum, i can say whatever i want, i dont need an invite, hello, here i am.
that "being insulted by a fool douchebag is always Un4Cc3Pt48L3!!!!!!"? wow, such a great samurai we have here! much honor very proud. get off your high horse!... more like a pony tho.
what are you going to say? that im a "KEYBOARD LION?" more like a keyboard bear, but still, rawr to you baby
still love you BAE
im not surpriced but that doesnt mean its not painful to read how APB's code breeds the strong desire to throw it away and redo from 0. best wishes for the mental sanity of all the people involved in this task!