Jump to content
Forum rules

Nev

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1115

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nev

  2. Posted

    Since the engine update seems like it's on track, I think it is an good opportunity to bring this thread to the attention of @MattScott. I feel that Esther's suggestion will really benefit APB as a whole and help it retain players once the engine update is out. Would also be a good idea for @MattScott to do a road map of what his plans are after the engine update since the engine update on it's own is not going to help retain players.

    • Like 2

  3. Posted · Edited by Nev

    6 hours ago, MattScott said:

    Hi there,

     

    For clarity, we didn’t invite anyone except the previously approved streamers in our program (which isn’t very large).


    From there we announced the streams, and then evaluated everyone who applied. I think one of the names you mentioned contacted us after we posted the list, and the other didnt contact us.

     

    This wasn’t intended to be exclusionary at all. There were very few we had to say ‘no’ to for one reason or another.
     

    Thanks,

    Matt

    At this point you might as well ask everyone else that have cheated in this game to become a streamer for this. I am not going to waste my time by coming back to the forums when you keep making 1 bad decision after another. What's the point in managing a company when you can't learn from your past mistakes. I really hope the engine update will bring a lot of population but with your management of this game I very much doubt we will see the pop rise to what it was during launch. Don't get me wrong I appreciate the fact that you have done a lot more than g1 but the way you are running the company is very similar to them with the false promises, not keeping with dates,ignoring feedback, getting influenced and putting some players on top compared to others ( which is one of the reasons people didn't believe in G1).  I have been around a while and it's funny to see that you are heading the same direction as previous management instead of learning from their mistakes.

     

    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1

  4. Posted

    13 hours ago, WitchQueen said:

    Maybe they don't see this as some opportunity to advertise to people that don't play APB. Maybe they're actually doing it for the community who have been waiting so long for this. The streamers they choose may not have viewers in the thousands but every single APB streamer interacts with their chats and answers every question because the questions aren't getting lost and scrolling upwards at a ridiculous pace. They have small pockets of the APB community and they're going to get brought together.

     

    There are actually some really big streamers that have streamed APB in the past. Summit is one of the biggest but there are a few more. If every one of those gets a shot on Friday and not the regulars then maybe you'd be on to something with your favouritism comment. But I just see a fun opportunity to bring several smaller communities together to enjoy something that has been in the making (for real) ever since LO bought G1 2 years ago and something we've been waiting maybe 6-7 years for.

     

    And sure they could have just streamed themselves playing but there are a few APB streamers that have bigger followings than the LO twitch channel. Having streamers do it first is a good way to get more traffic.

    No offence I don't think there is any active streamer at the moment that has done anything for APB to be considered anything more than any other player that does not stream. The follower count of these streamers won't make a big difference at all. This is such a small community and most people will know about the stream without having to go through these people, not like they have an insane following anyways. Even the current biggest apb twitch streamer "kempington" struggles to get 20 active viewers when he streams other games. In terms of gathering questions APB wouldn't even get more than 500-600 viewers max on their stream nor would any of the streamers currently active, which is an easy number to work with for gathering questions.

     

    There is an reason why the population in this game is on a decline even with the corona outbreak it has not done an amazing job to convince people to come back and play the game. There will always be people up LO's asses supporting them blindly no matter what they do. Don't get me wrong I am grateful for everything they have done for the game and for finally making the engine update a reality but the way they interact with the community is piss poor and there has been a lot of occasions since they have taken over where a few members of the community seem to be favoured and have a influence on the decision making which should never be a thing for any gaming company.

     

    • Like 1

  5. Posted · Edited by Nev

    All I see is favouritism and the same old shit with this company. I hope the engine update is gonna be all that it's hyped up to be or else I don't really see a future for this game. I don't see the point in favouring streamers who don't bring any new players to APB as a way to show 2.1.  95% of streamers don't even push above 100 viewers which is pretty much nothing. I'l rather we all get an opportunity to test the game whenever it's ready than watch streamers test out their systems. I personally think it would've been better for the dev team to stream and for us to be able to ask questions to the dev team than having to get these streamers to gather the question for us.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 3

  8. Posted · Edited by Nev

    Poor management, Poor choices of staff, Poor planning, Fake promises and too many apologies for shit they should’ve got right.

     

    The game is in the worst state at the moment losing players by the day making bronze & green players play against people with 3-20k hours on top of messing up the servers for the highest populated server by forcing EU players to play on NA ping. 
     

    It’s been an amazing year! 2020 is the year for APB;)

    • Thanks 1

  10. Posted

    1 hour ago, cheater said:

    Why do you activate the compensation premium when:
    A. bronze players will probably just keep losing and will not want to play due to no matchmaking.
    B. Most of EU players dont want to play on 100+ ping until hardware arrives.

    Do you guys really dont think about anything you do?

    Problem is that they never think. I think their track record just shows how poor they are at managing this game.

    • Like 2

  12. Posted

    30 minutes ago, Sayori said:

    Can't tell whether this is funny or sad. Yet another thing postponed due to mismanagement. 

    You've been talking about it over a month and a half, you knew your mail system (supposedly?) sucks and you will be rebuilding it, and yet you planned this and made the  announcement.

    Did you really also not expect some people to start "squatting" names so they can resell them later? 

    Unfortunately you can't easily prevent that unless build some detection system for account creations but then...hwid spoofing.

     

    "For those that bought name changes, we're not that far out."

     You realize that once someone buys a name change they can't play with that character until they change their name? 🙂  But it's also people's fault for preemptively buying name changes.

     

    Sorry, I wish I could say something positive but you guys are making it very difficult.

     

    For the people that did name change prior to the cancellation. Good luck contacting support, it's going to take at least a month or more until they respond to your ticket.

  13. Posted · Edited by Nev

    No offence Matt these are things you should’ve thought off way before you gave us a date. Frankly sounds like an excuse for you and the dev team not being able to implement this wipe effectively.  After all the other issues you have had with giving us dates and delaying them, This is really unprofessional for a company specially when you keep doing it consistently. If I was LO I would think very carefully about dates and make sure something is completed and tested before giving out any dates to us since it’s clear you guys have issues with keeping up with dates so don’t give one unless you are sure you can keep them.

     

    All the stuff brought up about name conflicts with was brought up before the announcement and after the name change thread yet you decide to cancel this in the last moment which make it sound like you are using that as an excuse for whatever technical difficulties you came across.

     

    I just hope we get better communication in the future and hopefully a non pre scripted QA with boring personalities and rather a way for the actual community to ask you questions in regards to what we want directly. What happened to our community manager ? I see more of the CEO than the community manager on the forum.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

  14. Posted

    1 hour ago, ForumUser said:

     

    I think it is pretty stupid to cater to people who no longer support the game. All a person needs to do is simply log into the game once before the deadline and they get to retain the name. If a person can't be bothered to log in once then they deserve to lose the name.

     

    What bothers me is the lack of information regarding names. Who gets priority for a name if both characters are 255? Does the person who created the name first get priority? Does the person who has the most gameplay hours get priority? Does the person who has the most recent gameplay hours get priority? Does the person who spent the most g1c get priority? @MattScott You need to list the requirements for name priority. I don't want to spend an egregious amount of hours and g1c for a name if I cannot retain the name.

    They might be just waiting for the engine update like most players who have supported this game for a long time.  The 1 month is not enough notice for someone that has been inactive for a year exactly. They could be on holiday or whatever, You can't just make a announcement and tell them to stop whatever they are doing to login during the month notice. Not to mention the fact that APB has always maintained that they wouldn't do name wipes in the past so these guys probably have no idea about the fact that it's happening if they are away.

  15. Posted

    On 8/31/2019 at 4:00 PM, neophobia said:

    fair enough

    but ye rerolling definitely wasn't endorsed xd they did have a rule about ban evasion, i just wasn't sure about LO

    they mostly took active old players that seem reasonable enough. should they have taken more random people?

    also kemp didn't do anything wrong, prove as a bad person or whatever so it makes sense they stick to him since the first q&a was quite successful, even now that he quit (for now).

    doesn't seem like special treatment to me.

    The way he comes out on his own stream by treating players in a bad manner on top of not looking like he enjoys the game most of the time is not someone I would want to advertise if I owned a game. I don't feel like he represents the APB community as a single person and the company should do stuff like this on their own and interact with the community directly rather than a 3rd person. But like I said nothing against Kempington I just feel that Little Orbit should do stuff on their own and communicate with us direct rather than an unofficial discord and 3rd party people.

     

    I wouldn't be surprised if we have another Sovereign situation with the way things are going.

     

    Post edited with author's consent.   - Mina_

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1

  16. Posted · Edited by Nev

     

    Pretty stupid to wipe char names of people who haven't logged in for a year, I can already feel the shitstorm that will follow it. It makes more sense to wipe char names of people that haven't logged in over 3-4 years. But then again you guys are the best at making the wrong decision and never keeping to time with anything you do.

     

    I just hope the engine update is not a failure considering all the time and delays there has been to it. I also don't feel the 1 month notice is enough if you are going to wipe people who have been inactive for 1 year, If it was for 3-4 years it wouldn't matter much but that's just my opinion.

     

    On 8/30/2019 at 10:52 AM, cheater said:

    But Kempington say he quit APB, What the fudge? !?!?! O_o

     

    Special treatment, Nothing against Kempington great guy but it's all it is. Same as how they are more active on the unofficial discord compared to the forums and a lot of the people from there seemed to be in SPCT and GM positions.

    • Like 4

  17. Posted

    13 minutes ago, ForumUser said:

    You are basing your opinion on loyalty, which is not a bad thing, but not always the best case from a business perspective.

     

    Let us use your scenario, 17k hour veteran with the name "Bum" (Citadel) and 1 hour of recent gameplay and 1k hour veteran with the name "Bum" (Jericho) and 40 hours of recent gameplay. Out of the two, who is more likely to spend money on the game? Who is more likely to promote the game? The user who currently plays the most.

     

    As you have stated, there is the possibility for an increase in population, but data from past merges refute that. Our previous merge with Joker and Colby proves this. There was a brief increase in overall population, but overtime it died down to what we currently have now. From a realistic perspective, what exactly do you think will prevent those inactive veterans from leaving again? The engine upgrade? New contacts? The gameplay of APB is cut and dry. An engine upgrade would not magically hold players' attentions and new contacts are another way of saying boring grind.

     

    I understand your perspective, but the past has shown that the inactive players will continue being inactive. The choice to cater to those who are currently active is the safest choice out of the two.

    I mean you are definitely entitled to your opinion and I get what you are trying to say. But I am sure you are an old player like me,  Have you really seen this game bring a lot of players based on people recommending the game? The active population has been hovering around the same point for so many years and since last year has been going down with the exception of the recent surge with merge but I am sure it will go down again.  I also would like to point that the current active population is what most people would consider a failure and wouldve shut down the game by this point. But just to touch on your idea of prioritising recently active players compared to veterans, what if someone is deployed to the army for a year or something would they deserve to lose their names to someone who have been playing actively the past couple of months? The point I am trying to make is that not everyone has the time to play this game a lot and recent hours should never be a variable in the decision of who gets the names in my opinion.

     

    Personally I think the only thing that would prevent majority of the current inactive players to leave again would be a game without active updates. It seems like LO are willing to bring new content to the game which I hope would entice them to stay. I have a lot of friends that haven't touched the game since 2013 who have been asking about the progress of the game over the years, these are the types of players that would come back once there is a major update and once they are satisfied that LO will deliver new content and actually look after the game which GamersFirst failed to do.

  18. Posted

    4 minutes ago, ForumUser said:

    I play the game on and off regardless of its shortcomings. Simply put, if they cared about their names they would have played "x" amount of hours to at least retain their names.

     

    I have played a lot of games and whenever a merge comes up, the publishers or developers usually cater to those who are currently the most active within their video games. Catering to those who do not play your game is not a good way to show how active the game is.

     

    That's on you. There are some players who wasted 17k hours of their life playing APB and sure that's some dedication to the game but doesn't make the player with 17k hours any better than someone with less. The point I am trying to get at is that the active population is so low that it wouldn't even make sense to cater them compared to the potential population that would return with the engine update. If those players find out that they won't keep their names it would decrease the potential of them coming back again . If you are talking about erasing names of players who just created their chars and spent less than 20 hours overall in the game sure I would understand but penalising anyone that has spent hundreds of hours in this game would just create a bad impression of this company in my opinion.

  19. Posted

    7 minutes ago, ForumUser said:

     

    Are those the only requirements? People are going log in and then never play again.

     

    I believe that any conflicting name should be based on recent gameplay hours prior to the merge. For example, if "Bum" on Jericho has 40 hours of recent gameplay before the merge and "Bum" on Citadel only has 1 hour of recent gameplay, "Bum" on Jericho gets to keep the name. In order for this to be fair, an exact date for the merge should be publicly mentioned. If the merge were to happen on September 25th, this would give us ample time to prepare and accumulate gameplay hours to keep our names.

     

    I am sure a few people would be mad about this stating that it is unfair to veterans, especially the 255s holding these names. My argument is this. Why should inactive players be able to hold names that they do not use? If you have not played APB in awhile, you did not care about the names in the first place.

    No.

     

    This would create a huge mess and most players who levelled their chars to a high level are bound to come back at some point and it would be a kick in the teeth for them.

     

    if someone hasn’t been active since launch sure I understand. But most old players don’t play the game because it’s been managed poorly and they want to see a change before coming back and they shouldn’t lose their names because of that. 

    • Like 1

  24. Posted

    I am sure a lot of people feel the same way which is why the population is dead. Little Orbit has added a lot of features such as the market trading system which is useful but nothing major or noteworthy to address the decline in population and interest of the game. I mean they can't even keep up with their own targets atm and have the slowest support system in the game industry at the moment.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...